NCT01740128

Brief Summary

Many people with spinal cord injury (SCI) retain at least some movement below their injury, but their muscles often have a 'mind of their own'. Typical exercise programs focus on keeping muscles strong and flexible, but don't usually focus on helping patients control their muscles. The investigators' exercise research study will compare two different programs with the specific goal of improving conscious control of patients' muscles below the injury. This study focuses on those with 'chronic' SCI - the injury occurred at least one year prior to enrolling. This is a single center study taking place in the Bronx, NY. The first phase of the study will be observational - the investigators will analyze which nerve connections might remain partially intact through the injury (even if the nerves aren't consciously controlled). Participants with all severity of SCI may participate in this first phase. The second phase of the study will involve people who retain at least slight ability to move their legs and the ability to move the arms against gravity. Each person will undergo two different exercise rehabilitation strategies: weight-supported treadmill training; and balance training combined with skilled arm or hand exercises. The investigators will compare the effects of these exercise programs on a variety of outcomes, including gait speed, balance, strength, and muscle activation in response to brain stimulation. The investigators hypothesize that participants with chronic SCI undergoing combined balance/arm/hand training will show improved outcomes when compared to traditional gait or balance training.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
21

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jan 2013

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

November 30, 2012

Completed
4 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

December 4, 2012

Completed
28 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 1, 2013

Completed
3.9 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

November 30, 2016

Completed
11 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

October 23, 2017

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

February 26, 2018

Completed
Last Updated

February 26, 2018

Status Verified

January 1, 2018

Enrollment Period

3.9 years

First QC Date

November 30, 2012

Results QC Date

November 16, 2017

Last Update Submit

January 26, 2018

Conditions

Keywords

spinal cord injuriesparaplegiapostural balancelocomotor activityexercise therapyelectromyographytranscranial magnetic stimulation, single pulse

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Change in Motor Evoked Potential (MEP) Amplitude in the Tibialis Anterior Muscle at the End of Training.

    Change between baseline and Evaluation #2 in motor evoked potential area in the tibialis anterior muscle.

    Eval #1 at baseline; Eval #2 at end of training (48 sessions, average 3-4 months)

Secondary Outcomes (10)

  • Change From Baseline in ISNCSCI Lower Extremity Motor Score.

    Eval #1 at baseline; Eval #2 at end of training (48 sessions, average 3-4 months)

  • Change From Baseline in Berg Balance Scale Sitting With Back Unsupported Score.

    Eval #1 at baseline; Eval #2 at end of training (48 sessions, average 3-4 months)

  • Change in Leg Spasticity on Modified Ashworth Scale

    Eval #1 at baseline; Eval #2 at end of training (48 sessions, average 3-4 months)

  • Change in Gait Speed on 10-meter Walk Test.

    Eval #1 at baseline; Eval #2 at end of training (48 sessions, average 3-4 months)

  • Change From Baseline in Walking Index for Spinal Cord Injury II (WISCI II) Scale.

    Eval #1 at baseline; Eval #2 at end of training (48 sessions, average 3-4 months)

  • +5 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Multimodal then Treadmill training

EXPERIMENTAL

Participants will undergo harness-supported multimodal balance training exercises while simultaneously performing skilled hand exercises. Following a washout period of at least 6 weeks, Participants will undergo body weight supported treadmill training using the Lokomat apparatus.

Device: Robotic body weight supported treadmill trainingOther: Harness-supported multimodal balance training

Treadmill then Multimodal training

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Robotic body weight supported treadmill training will be applied using the Lokomat apparatus. Following a washout period of at least 6 weeks, Participants will undergo harness-supported balance training exercises while simultaneously performing skilled hand exercises.

Device: Robotic body weight supported treadmill trainingOther: Harness-supported multimodal balance training

Interventions

30-minute sessions will be conducted 3-4 times per week for a total of 48 sessions over 12 to 16 weeks.

Also known as: Lokomat
Multimodal then Treadmill trainingTreadmill then Multimodal training

30-minute sessions will be conducted 3-4 times per week for a total of 48 sessions over 12 to 16 weeks.

Also known as: balance exercises, skilled hand exercises
Multimodal then Treadmill trainingTreadmill then Multimodal training

Eligibility Criteria

Age21 Years - 65 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Males or females age 21-65 years;
  • SCI duration \> 12 months;
  • SCI level C2-T12;
  • All SCI severity eligible for baseline testing;
  • For exercise protocol, must have severity of Grade C or D on American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) Impairment Scale, or volitional strength of at least 1/5 in two or more key lower extremity muscles, as well as at least 3/5 in both shoulder and elbow muscles;
  • Able to tolerate upright position with support;
  • Morphologically capable of fitting a weight-support harness and robotic treadmill system;
  • Ability to give informed consent.

You may not qualify if:

  • Unsuitable cognitive capacity as judged by the study physician;
  • Multiple spinal cord lesions;
  • History of frequent autonomic dysreflexia;
  • History of seizures;
  • Use of medications that significantly lower seizure threshold, such as anti-psychotics, tricyclic antidepressants, amphetamines, and bupropion;
  • History of implanted brain/spine/nerve stimulators, aneurysm clips, or cardiac pacemaker/defibrillator;
  • Deep vein thrombosis in lower extremities of less than 6 months duration;
  • Pregnancy;
  • (Interventional phase only): Lack of detectable tibialis anterior motor evoked potential (MEP) at baseline even with active facilitation;
  • (Interventional phase only): Pressure ulcers greater than stage 1 severity on the foot, ankle, knee and/or pelvic girdle;
  • (Interventional phase only): Bone mineral density of the hip (proximal femur) T-score \<3.5 standard deviations from age- and gender-matched normative data;
  • (Interventional phase only): Any spasticity, contractures, or heterotopic ossification that result in inadequate range of motion of the shoulder, elbow, wrist, fingers, hip, knee, or ankle joints in the judgment of the study physician;
  • (Interventional phase only): Inability to cooperate with instructions or unwilling to commit to daily training sessions for 3-4 days per week over 12-16 weeks;
  • (Interventional phase only): A diagnosis of coronary artery disease that precludes moderate to intense exercise.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

James J. Peters VA Medical Center, Bronx, NY

The Bronx, New York, 10468, United States

Location

Related Publications (2)

  • Harel NY, Asselin PK, Fineberg DB, Pisano TJ, Bauman WA, Spungen AM. Adaptation of computerized posturography to assess seated balance in persons with spinal cord injury. J Spinal Cord Med. 2013 Mar;36(2):127-33. doi: 10.1179/2045772312Y.0000000053.

    PMID: 23809527BACKGROUND
  • Harel NY, Martinez SA, Knezevic S, Asselin PK, Spungen AM. Acute changes in soleus H-reflex facilitation and central motor conduction after targeted physical exercises. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2015 Jun;25(3):438-43. doi: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2015.02.009. Epub 2015 Mar 2.

    PMID: 25771437BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Spinal Cord InjuriesParaplegiaParaparesis

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Spinal Cord DiseasesCentral Nervous System DiseasesNervous System DiseasesTrauma, Nervous SystemWounds and InjuriesParalysisNeurologic ManifestationsSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsParesis

Limitations and Caveats

Smaller than expected enrollment, high dropout rate.

Results Point of Contact

Title
Noam Y. Harel, MD, PhD
Organization
James J. Peters VAMC

Study Officials

  • Noam Y Harel, MD PhD

    James J. Peters Veterans Affairs Medical Center

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
CROSSOVER
Sponsor Type
FED
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

November 30, 2012

First Posted

December 4, 2012

Study Start

January 1, 2013

Primary Completion

November 30, 2016

Study Completion

October 23, 2017

Last Updated

February 26, 2018

Results First Posted

February 26, 2018

Record last verified: 2018-01

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

A Limited Dataset (LDS) will be shared in electronic format pursuant to a VA-approved Data Use Agreement. Individually Identifiable Data will be shared pursuant to valid HIPAA Authorization, Informed Consent, and an appropriate written agreement limiting use of the data to the conditions as described in the authorization and consent, and a written assurance from the recipient that the information will be maintained in accordance with the security requirements of 38 CFR Part 1.466.

Locations