Keyhole Surgery for the Positioning of the Distal Catheter in Ventricular Peritoneal Shunt Placement
Laparoscopically Assisted Ventriculoperitoneal Shunt Placement: A Prospective, Randomized Two-arm Study
1 other identifier
observational
120
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Ventriculoperitoneal shunting (VPS) was first described at the beginning of the 20th century as a diversionary procedure in patients with a hydrocephalus. After the introduction of silastic catheters in the 1970's this method became the treatment of choice for children and adults with communicating hydrocephalus. The average patient necessitating VPS will undergo at least two shunt revisions every three years, with some patients requiring more than twenty revisions within the first year. Therefore, any technical improvement with a positive impact on the revision rate not only benefits the patient through a reduction of the surgical burden but may also have economic advantages. Distal shunt failures - either due to improper placement or secondary dislocation of the distal catheter out of the peritoneal cavity - have been reported in 10-30% of cases. Catheter placement in obese patients and in patients with adhesions owing to previous abdominal surgery remains challenging. Most neurosurgeons will carry out a mini-laparotomy to allow for the placement of the distal catheter end within the peritoneal cavity, which rarely requires the help of a general or visceral surgeon. An alternative to laparotomy is the laparoscopic placement of the peritoneal catheter in VPS. Retrospective series have since shown the safety of this procedure and suggested an advantage of laparoscopic VPS in terms of operation duration, length of hospital stay and the rate of distal (and thus potentially overall) shunt dysfunction. The evidence concerning the effect of laparoscopic surgery for VPS placement is so far based on non-randomized studies, in which a selection bias may have influenced the outcomes.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for all trials
Started Mar 2007
Longer than P75 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2007
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 1, 2012
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 1, 2012
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 27, 2012
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 3, 2012
CompletedDecember 18, 2012
December 1, 2012
4.9 years
November 27, 2012
December 17, 2012
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Number of patients with overall shunt failure
12 months
Secondary Outcomes (7)
Number of patients with distal shunt failure
6 Weeks, 6 Months, 12 Months
Number of days to resumption of full oral food intake
7 Days
Amount of analgesic (NSAID) drug intake as evaluated on day 5 postoperatively, measured in mg
5 Days
Duration of Operation
10 hours
Duration of Hospital Stay
20 Days
- +2 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
1
VP Shunt Surgery for laparoscopic insertion of the peritoneal catheter
2
VP Shunt Surgery for open insertion of the peritoneal catheter
Interventions
Patients in this Study Arm will receive a VP Shunt inserted laparoscopically
Patients in this Study Arm will receive a VP Shunt inserted openly
Eligibility Criteria
Randomized are all patients who are 18 years or older; who are treated at the Department of Neurosurgery, Inselspital Bern; who are diagnosed with a Hydrocephalus and need a VP Shunt; Patients who have a Shunt malfunction and Patient who have given the written approval (informed consent)
You may qualify if:
- Age 18 years or older
- newly diagnosed hydrocephalus needing VP Shunt according to a board certified neurosurgeon
- Patients with shunt-malfunction needing VP Shunt revision and replacement of the peritoneal catheter
- Written Informed Consent
You may not qualify if:
- Age younger than 18 years
- Pregnancy
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Department of Neurosurgery
Bern, 3010, Switzerland
Related Publications (13)
Raimondi AJ, Matsumoto S. A simplified technique for performing the ventriculo-peritoneal shunt. Technical note. J Neurosurg. 1967 Mar;26(3):357-60. doi: 10.3171/jns.1967.26.3.0357. No abstract available.
PMID: 6019744RESULTAmes RH. Ventriculo-peritoneal shunts in the management of hydrocephalus. J Neurosurg. 1967 Dec;27(6):525-9. doi: 10.3171/jns.1967.27.6.0525. No abstract available.
PMID: 6065126RESULTGrosfeld JL, Cooney DR, Smith J, Campbell RL. Intra-abdominal complications following ventriculoperitoneal shunt procedures. Pediatrics. 1974 Dec;54(6):791-6. No abstract available.
PMID: 4431676RESULTKhosrovi H, Kaufman HH, Hrabovsky E, Bloomfield SM, Prabhu V, el-Kadi HA. Laparoscopic-assisted distal ventriculoperitoneal shunt placement. Surg Neurol. 1998 Feb;49(2):127-34; discussion 134-5. doi: 10.1016/s0090-3019(97)00357-1.
PMID: 9457261RESULTAbu-Dalu K, Pode D, Hadani M, Sahar A. Colonic complications of ventriculoperitoneal shunts. Neurosurgery. 1983 Aug;13(2):167-9. doi: 10.1227/00006123-198308000-00011.
PMID: 6888697RESULTWilson CB, Bertan V. Perforation of the bowel complicating peritoneal shunt for hydrocephalus. Report of two cases. Am Surg. 1966 Sep;32(9):601-3. No abstract available.
PMID: 5916956RESULTBasauri L, Selman JM, Lizana C. Peritoneal catheter insertion using laparoscopic guidance. Pediatr Neurosurg. 1993 Mar-Apr;19(2):109-10. doi: 10.1159/000120711.
PMID: 8443096RESULTCuatico W, Vannix D. Laparoscopically guided peritoneal insertion in ventriculoperitoneal shunts. J Laparoendosc Surg. 1995 Oct;5(5):309-11. doi: 10.1089/lps.1995.5.309.
PMID: 8845504RESULTBani A, Hassler WE. Laparoscopy-guided insertion of peritoneal catheters in ventriculoperitoneal shunt procedures: analysis of 39 children. Pediatr Neurosurg. 2006;42(3):156-8. doi: 10.1159/000091858.
PMID: 16636616RESULTSchievink WI, Wharen RE Jr, Reimer R, Pettit PD, Seiler JC, Shine TS. Laparoscopic placement of ventriculoperitoneal shunts: preliminary report. Mayo Clin Proc. 1993 Nov;68(11):1064-6. doi: 10.1016/s0025-6196(12)60899-4.
PMID: 8231270RESULTReardon PR, Scarborough TK, Matthews BD, Marti JL, Preciado A. Laparoscopically assisted ventriculoperitoneal shunt placement using 2-mm instrumentation. Surg Endosc. 2000 Jun;14(6):585-6. doi: 10.1007/s004640020078.
PMID: 10890971RESULTKirshtein B, Benifla M, Roy-Shapira A, Merkin V, Melamed I, Cohen Z, Cohen A. Laparoscopically guided distal ventriculoperitoneal shunt placement. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2004 Oct;14(5):276-8. doi: 10.1097/00129689-200410000-00009.
PMID: 15492657RESULTSchucht P, Banz V, Trochsler M, Iff S, Krahenbuhl AK, Reinert M, Beck J, Raabe A, Candinas D, Kuhlen D, Mariani L. Laparoscopically assisted ventriculoperitoneal shunt placement: a prospective randomized controlled trial. J Neurosurg. 2015 May;122(5):1058-67. doi: 10.3171/2014.9.JNS132791. Epub 2014 Dec 23.
PMID: 25534231DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Philippe E Schucht, MD
Department of Neurosurgery
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- CASE ONLY
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 27, 2012
First Posted
December 3, 2012
Study Start
March 1, 2007
Primary Completion
February 1, 2012
Study Completion
March 1, 2012
Last Updated
December 18, 2012
Record last verified: 2012-12