NCT01739062

Brief Summary

The preferred method for early detection of prostate cancer (PCa) in older men with family history is the Prostate Specific Antigen test (PSA test), although the method is imprecise. It produces a high number of false-positive results and increases the risk of over-diagnosis and over-treatment. Yet, an increasing number of men get the PSA test as part of unsystematic screening. Genetic risk assessment may be a better way to identify men with low risk of PCa. The main study hypothesis is that genetic information about low risk of PCa can reduce the number of patients who get a PSA test as part of unsystematic screening.

Trial Health

75
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
5,000

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable prostate-cancer

Timeline
67mo left

Started Feb 2013

Longer than P75 for not_applicable prostate-cancer

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
active not recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress71%
Feb 2013Oct 2031

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

November 27, 2012

Completed
3 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

November 30, 2012

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

February 1, 2013

Completed
12.8 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

October 30, 2025

Completed
6 years until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

October 30, 2031

Expected
Last Updated

December 4, 2023

Status Verified

November 1, 2023

Enrollment Period

12.8 years

First QC Date

November 27, 2012

Last Update Submit

November 28, 2023

Conditions

Keywords

PSA testProstate cancerGenetic screening

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Number of low risk patients who get a PSA test

    The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the impact on use of PSA tests of introducing genetic PCa risk assessment in general practice.

    1 year, 2 years

Study Arms (2)

Genetic risk assessment

EXPERIMENTAL

At least 40 SNP (single nucleotide polymorphisms)increase the risk of PCa. The individual risk of PCa accumulates with the increasing number of these genetic variants. The risk is doubled if patient has familial disposition as well. In retrospective studies, non-genetic risk-prediction models were compared to risk-prediction models containing both non-genetic factors and SNPs analyses. The genetic models had a significantly higher specificity than the non-genetic models. It has been argued that genetic PCa risk assessment could reduce the inexpedient use of PSA tests, saving it for patients at high risk of PCa.

Genetic: Genetic risk assessment

Familial disposition risk assessment

NO INTERVENTION

Interventions

Also known as: Single nucleotide polymorphism
Genetic risk assessment

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 80 Years
Sexmale
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • patients who receive a PSA test

You may not qualify if:

  • age over 80 years
  • elevated PSA-level (\> 4,0 ng/ml) concurrently or within previous 2 years
  • prostate or bladder disease
  • prostate cancer
  • non-Caucasians
  • do not speak and understand Danish

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Department of Molecular Medicine

Aarhus N, Aarhus, 8200, Denmark

Location

Related Publications (4)

  • Fredsoe J, Kirkegaard P, Edwards A, Vedsted P, Sorensen KD, Bro F. A genetic risk assessment for prostate cancer influences patients' risk perception and use of repeat PSA testing: a cross-sectional study in Danish general practice. BJGP Open. 2020 Jun 23;4(2):bjgpopen20X101039. doi: 10.3399/bjgpopen20X101039. Print 2020.

    PMID: 32457098BACKGROUND
  • Fredsoe J, Koetsenruyter J, Vedsted P, Kirkegaard P, Vaeth M, Edwards A, Orntoft TF, Sorensen KD, Bro F. The effect of assessing genetic risk of prostate cancer on the use of PSA tests in primary care: A cluster randomized controlled trial. PLoS Med. 2020 Feb 7;17(2):e1003033. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003033. eCollection 2020 Feb.

    PMID: 32032355BACKGROUND
  • Kirkegaard P, Edwards A, Nielsen TLO, Orntoft TF, Sorensen KD, Borre M, Bro F. Perceptions about screening for prostate cancer using genetic lifetime risk assessment: a qualitative study. BMC Fam Pract. 2018 Feb 17;19(1):32. doi: 10.1186/s12875-018-0717-6.

    PMID: 29454309BACKGROUND
  • Kirkegaard P, Vedsted P, Edwards A, Fenger-Gron M, Bro F. A cluster-randomised, parallel group, controlled intervention study of genetic prostate cancer risk assessment and use of PSA tests in general practice--the ProCaRis study: study protocol. BMJ Open. 2013 Mar 1;3(3):e002452. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2012-002452.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Prostatic Neoplasms

Interventions

Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Genital Neoplasms, MaleUrogenital NeoplasmsNeoplasms by SiteNeoplasmsGenital Diseases, MaleGenital DiseasesUrogenital DiseasesProstatic DiseasesMale Urogenital Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Polymorphism, GeneticGenetic VariationGenetic Phenomena

Study Officials

  • Karina D Sørensen, PhD

    Department of Molecular Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Flemming Bro, Professor

    The Research Unit for General Practice, Aarhus University, Denmark

    STUDY CHAIR
  • Peter Vedsted, Professor

    Danish Research Centre for Cancer Diagnosis in Primary Care, Aarhus University, Denmark

    STUDY CHAIR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
SCREENING
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

November 27, 2012

First Posted

November 30, 2012

Study Start

February 1, 2013

Primary Completion

October 30, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

October 30, 2031

Last Updated

December 4, 2023

Record last verified: 2023-11

Locations