Dietary Fiber for Fecal Incontinence
The Impact of Fiber Fermentation on Fecal Incontinence
2 other identifiers
interventional
206
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The primary aim of this study was to compare the effects of supplementation with one of three dietary fibers (gum arabic, carboxy-methylcellulose, or psyllium) or a placebo on fecal incontinence (FI), symptom intolerance, and quality of life in community-living individuals who have incontinence of loose or liquid feces. A secondary aim was to explore the possible mechanism(s) underlying the supplements' efficacy (i.e., improvements in stool consistency, water-holding capacity or gel formation).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Apr 2004
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
April 1, 2004
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2007
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2010
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 21, 2012
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 30, 2012
CompletedMay 9, 2023
May 1, 2023
3.2 years
November 21, 2012
May 8, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
self-report of an incontinent episode on a daily stool diary
the date and time of an incontinence episode was reported and the ratio of the number of incontinence episodes to total stools daily was calculated
Secondary Outcomes (8)
self-report of gastro-intestinal symptoms on a daily symptom record
self-report of quality of life
Water-holding capacity of non-frozen of stools
Gel formation of non-frozen stools
Total dietary fiber content of feces
- +3 more secondary outcomes
Other Outcomes (10)
self-reported rating of consistency of continent stools on a daily stool diary
usual diet intake
report of additional fluid intake
- +7 more other outcomes
Study Arms (4)
Placebo
PLACEBO COMPARATORbasic recipe for juice and muffin recipe abbreviated PLB
Carboxymethylcellulose
EXPERIMENTALThe supplements were prepared as two fruit juice mixtures (each 270 ml) providing 7 g total fiber/d) and two small muffins providing 9 g total fiber/d for 16 g of toal fiber daily. abbreviated CMC
Gum Arabic
EXPERIMENTALThe supplements were prepared as two fruit juice mixtures (each 270 ml) providing 7 g total fiber/d) and two small muffins providing 9 g total fiber/d for 16 g of toal fiber daily. abbreviated GA
Psyllium
EXPERIMENTALThe supplements were prepared as two fruit juice mixtures (each 270 ml) providing 7 g total fiber/d) and two small muffins providing 9 g total fiber/d for 16 g of toal fiber daily. abbreviated as PSY
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- age ≥18 years
- living in the community (not a nursing home or assisted living facility)
- self-report of usually having FI of loose or liquid consistency at least twice in a 2-wk period
- toilets independently
- ability to read and write in English.
- Persons that regularly performed pelvic floor muscle exercises and/or biofeedback on a maintenance regimen for at least 20 wks or who took a steady dose of anti-motility medications on a regular schedule that still met the FI criteria were also eligible.
You may not qualify if:
- difficulty swallowing,
- a gastrointestinal (GI) tract altered by surgery,
- a malabsorption disorder,
- inflammatory bowel disease,
- gastrointestinal cancer or active cancer treatment,
- allergy to the fibers,
- regularly used a laxative or enema, were tube-fed, or unwilling to discontinue taking periodic self-prescribed fiber supplements or anti-diarrheal medications.
- a score ≤24 on the Mini Mental State Examination
- having/reporting fewer than two episodes of FI or being incapable of performing study procedures during the run-in baseline period
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University of Minnesota
Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55455, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Donna Z Bliss, phD
University of Minnesota
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- FACTORIAL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 21, 2012
First Posted
November 30, 2012
Study Start
April 1, 2004
Primary Completion
June 1, 2007
Study Completion
December 1, 2010
Last Updated
May 9, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-05