NCT01733927

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study, conducted in Santiago-Chile, was to:

  1. 1.Evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of OraQuick Advance oral rapid test (OQA)when compared to ELISA;
  2. 2.Track the number of people in the study who returned for their ELISA test HIV results; and
  3. 3.Analyze the perception among participants of the use of OQA compared to ELISA testing for HIV screening.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
497

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for phase_3

Timeline
Completed

Started May 2010

Shorter than P25 for phase_3

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

May 1, 2010

Completed
6 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

November 1, 2010

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

March 1, 2011

Completed
1.7 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

November 21, 2012

Completed
6 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

November 27, 2012

Completed
Last Updated

November 27, 2012

Status Verified

November 1, 2012

Enrollment Period

6 months

First QC Date

November 21, 2012

Last Update Submit

November 26, 2012

Conditions

Keywords

HIV screeningRapid test for HIV

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • The sensitivity and specificity of a rapid test in oral fluid (OraQuick Advance)compare to the ELISA test for HIV.

    OraQuick Advance rapid oral test (OQA) was administered to people living with HIV (PLWH) who were not under Anti-retroviral treatment. The PLWH had a previous positive ELISA test and confirmed diagnose with a Western-blot. People who didn't know their HIV diagnose, and who had come to the clinic for an ELISA test for HIV were also administered OQA test after they had completed their ELISA test.

    1 day (Immediately after the participants had taken their ELISA test for HIV or when recruited in case of people living with HIV.)

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • The number of people who received their result from the ELISA for HIV test, versus the number of people who receives their OQA results.

    Clinic staff notified patient of their ELISA test results for up to three weeks after their clinic visit.

Other Outcomes (1)

  • Perceptions among study participants of the use of OQA compared to ELISA testing for HIV screening.

    Within 3 months after they were administered their OQA test, the participants were either interviewed or participated in a focus group.

Study Arms (1)

Rapid testing for HIV

EXPERIMENTAL

The intervention consisted in administer an oral rapid test for HIV (OQA) to people that also had taken an ELISA test to compare their tests results. Group 1 consisted of 344 participants who did not know their HIV status; Group 2 consisted of 153 participants who were previously confirmed to be HIV positive. The participants were instructed to obtain their own oral fluid sample using the testing devices provide by the OQA rapid test kits. Project team members, certified to interpret OQA results, registered each test outcome on a data form using the same code number that the participant was assigned for the ELISA test.

Device: Rapid testing for HIV

Interventions

The research team members were trained and certified in administering the OQA testing through the AIDS International Consortium in Philadelphia (WHCI), USA. During the recruitment process, participants were informed about the nature of the test, the length of time for results, and what procedures would be involved in self-administering the OQA test. After providing informed consent, including the release of information for research use, participants demonstrated their ability to properly take an OQA sample using a popsicle stick as a proxy for the testing device.

Also known as: OraQuick Advance rapid test
Rapid testing for HIV

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • years old or older
  • Seeking ELISA testing to learn their HIV status (group 1) or
  • Having been confirmed HIV positive through Western Blot testing (Group 2)

You may not qualify if:

  • HIV positive currently under antiretroviral medication

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

School of Nursing, Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile

Macul, Santiago Metropolitan, 7810000, Chile

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Irarrazabal LP, Ferrer L, Cianelli R, Lara L, Reed R, Levy J, Perez C. Oral rapid test: an alternative to traditional HIV screening in Chile. Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2013 Jun;33(6):427-32.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

HIV Seropositivity

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

HIV InfectionsBlood-Borne InfectionsCommunicable DiseasesInfectionsSexually Transmitted Diseases, ViralSexually Transmitted DiseasesLentivirus InfectionsRetroviridae InfectionsRNA Virus InfectionsVirus DiseasesGenital DiseasesUrogenital DiseasesImmunologic Deficiency SyndromesImmune System Diseases

Study Officials

  • Lisette P Irarrazabal, PhD ©

    Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile / University of Illinois at Chicago

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 3
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

November 21, 2012

First Posted

November 27, 2012

Study Start

May 1, 2010

Primary Completion

November 1, 2010

Study Completion

March 1, 2011

Last Updated

November 27, 2012

Record last verified: 2012-11

Locations