An Evaluation of a Rapid Test for HIV
An Evaluation of an Oral Rapid Test for HIV
1 other identifier
interventional
497
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study, conducted in Santiago-Chile, was to:
- 1.Evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of OraQuick Advance oral rapid test (OQA)when compared to ELISA;
- 2.Track the number of people in the study who returned for their ELISA test HIV results; and
- 3.Analyze the perception among participants of the use of OQA compared to ELISA testing for HIV screening.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_3
Started May 2010
Shorter than P25 for phase_3
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2010
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 1, 2010
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 1, 2011
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 21, 2012
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 27, 2012
CompletedNovember 27, 2012
November 1, 2012
6 months
November 21, 2012
November 26, 2012
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
The sensitivity and specificity of a rapid test in oral fluid (OraQuick Advance)compare to the ELISA test for HIV.
OraQuick Advance rapid oral test (OQA) was administered to people living with HIV (PLWH) who were not under Anti-retroviral treatment. The PLWH had a previous positive ELISA test and confirmed diagnose with a Western-blot. People who didn't know their HIV diagnose, and who had come to the clinic for an ELISA test for HIV were also administered OQA test after they had completed their ELISA test.
1 day (Immediately after the participants had taken their ELISA test for HIV or when recruited in case of people living with HIV.)
Secondary Outcomes (1)
The number of people who received their result from the ELISA for HIV test, versus the number of people who receives their OQA results.
Clinic staff notified patient of their ELISA test results for up to three weeks after their clinic visit.
Other Outcomes (1)
Perceptions among study participants of the use of OQA compared to ELISA testing for HIV screening.
Within 3 months after they were administered their OQA test, the participants were either interviewed or participated in a focus group.
Study Arms (1)
Rapid testing for HIV
EXPERIMENTALThe intervention consisted in administer an oral rapid test for HIV (OQA) to people that also had taken an ELISA test to compare their tests results. Group 1 consisted of 344 participants who did not know their HIV status; Group 2 consisted of 153 participants who were previously confirmed to be HIV positive. The participants were instructed to obtain their own oral fluid sample using the testing devices provide by the OQA rapid test kits. Project team members, certified to interpret OQA results, registered each test outcome on a data form using the same code number that the participant was assigned for the ELISA test.
Interventions
The research team members were trained and certified in administering the OQA testing through the AIDS International Consortium in Philadelphia (WHCI), USA. During the recruitment process, participants were informed about the nature of the test, the length of time for results, and what procedures would be involved in self-administering the OQA test. After providing informed consent, including the release of information for research use, participants demonstrated their ability to properly take an OQA sample using a popsicle stick as a proxy for the testing device.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- years old or older
- Seeking ELISA testing to learn their HIV status (group 1) or
- Having been confirmed HIV positive through Western Blot testing (Group 2)
You may not qualify if:
- HIV positive currently under antiretroviral medication
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
School of Nursing, Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile
Macul, Santiago Metropolitan, 7810000, Chile
Related Publications (1)
Irarrazabal LP, Ferrer L, Cianelli R, Lara L, Reed R, Levy J, Perez C. Oral rapid test: an alternative to traditional HIV screening in Chile. Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2013 Jun;33(6):427-32.
PMID: 23939368DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Lisette P Irarrazabal, PhD ©
Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile / University of Illinois at Chicago
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 21, 2012
First Posted
November 27, 2012
Study Start
May 1, 2010
Primary Completion
November 1, 2010
Study Completion
March 1, 2011
Last Updated
November 27, 2012
Record last verified: 2012-11