Biodentine Versus White MTA Pulpotomy
The Clinical and Radiographic Efficacy of Biodentine™ and White Mineral Trioxide Aggregate in Deciduous Molar Pulpotomy - a Randomized Control Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
120
1 country
1
Brief Summary
A clinical trial to evaluate and compare three different products used for endodontic treatment (taking the infected nerve out of the teeth) of primary teeth. Null Hypothesis: The new biological products (WMTA and Biodentine) behave as good as the former iodoform product.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_3
Started Oct 2011
Typical duration for phase_3
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
October 4, 2011
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 7, 2012
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 27, 2012
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 1, 2015
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 1, 2016
CompletedNovember 22, 2021
November 1, 2021
4.1 years
November 7, 2012
November 19, 2021
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (7)
Clinical successes after pulpotomy.
clinical evaluation and radiography of the tooth is performed. Clinical criteria: abscence of post-operative pain, absence of pain on percussion and palpation, absence of abscess or swelling, absence of sinus tract or fistula and absence of pathologic tooth mobility.
at baseline visit
Clinical success after pulpotomy.
clinical evaluation and radiography of the tooth is performed. Clinical criteria: abscence of post-operative pain, absence of pain on percussion and palpation, absence of abscess or swelling, absence of sinus tract or fistula and absence of pathologic tooth mobility.
3 months after pulpotomy.
Clinical successes after pulpotomy.
Clinical evaluation and radiography of the tooth is performed. Clinical criteria: abscence of post-operative pain, absence of pain on percussion and palpation, absence of abscess or swelling, absence of sinus tract or fistula and absence of pathologic tooth mobility.
6 months after pulpotomy.
Clinical successes after pulpotomy.
Clinical evaluation and radiography of the tooth is performed. Clinical criteria: abscence of post-operative pain, absence of pain on percussion and palpation, absence of abscess or swelling, absence of sinus tract or fistula and absence of pathologic tooth mobility.
12 months after pulpotomy.
Radiographic successes after pulpotomy.
Radiographic criteria: presence of normal periodontal ligament space, absence of internal or external root resorption, absence of canal calcification, absence of periradicular radiolucency and no loss or break of lamina dura.
at baseline visit
Radiographic successes after pulpotomy.
Radiographic criteria: presence of normal periodontal ligament space, absence of internal or external root resorption, absence of canal calcification, absence of periradicular radiolucency and no loss or break of lamina dura.
6 months after pulpotomy.
Radiographic successes after pulpotomy.
Radiographic criteria: presence of normal periodontal ligament space, absence of internal or external root resorption, absence of canal calcification, absence of periradicular radiolucency and no loss or break of lamina dura.
12 months after pulpotomy.
Study Arms (3)
Biodentine
EXPERIMENTALPulpotomy using Biodentine as pulpotomy medicine.
White Mineral trioxide Aggregate (MTA)
ACTIVE COMPARATORPulpotomy using white MTA as pulpotomy medicine.
Tempophore
ACTIVE COMPARATORPulpotomy using Tempophore as pulpotomy medicine in a control group.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients (Children with carious deciduous molars indicated for pulpotomy) belonging to the category of ASA I according to the 'American Society of Anaesthesiologists'.
- Patients without any known medical history of systemic complications contradicting pulp treatment.
- Patients are indicated for treatment under general anaesthesia due to polycaries / fear / anxiety / very young age.
- Written consent is obtained from the parent/guardian after explaining the full details of the treatment procedure and its possible outcomes.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University Ghentlead
Study Sites (1)
Ghent University Hospital
Ghent, 9000, Belgium
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Luc Martens, PhD, DDS
University Ghent
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 7, 2012
First Posted
November 27, 2012
Study Start
October 4, 2011
Primary Completion
November 1, 2015
Study Completion
February 1, 2016
Last Updated
November 22, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-11