NCT01730573

Brief Summary

Primary objective of this study is to prospectively compare and evaluate efficacy as well as note side effects of the interscalene block and combined suprascapular and axillary nerve block for ambulatory arthroscopic rotator cuff repair.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
60

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Nov 2012

Geographic Reach
1 country

2 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

November 1, 2012

Completed
8 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

November 9, 2012

Completed
12 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

November 21, 2012

Completed
1.7 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

August 1, 2014

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

August 1, 2014

Completed
Last Updated

February 14, 2017

Status Verified

February 1, 2017

Enrollment Period

1.7 years

First QC Date

November 9, 2012

Last Update Submit

February 11, 2017

Conditions

Keywords

interscalenesuprascapularaxillary

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Analgesic Efficacy

    Visual Analogue scores for pain will be analyzed using chi-squared test. Interscalene block (ISB) of the brachial plexus has been demonstrated to be one of the most effective analgesic modality during arthroscopic shoulder surgery. However, despite its (ISB) time-tested record of relative safety, ISB is associated with some complications. These could be central nervous system, respiratory and cardiovascular complications. These side effects and complications are based upon the anatomy of the brachial plexus at this level.Recently, suprascapular and axillary nerve blocks have been used to control postoperative shoulder pain. The study will try to find out whether combined supra scapular and axillary nerve blocks are as effective in pain control as compared to inter scalene block.

    one year

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Side effects

    1 year

Other Outcomes (1)

  • Patient satisfaction

    1 year

Study Arms (2)

Interscalene block

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

This arm patients will receive inter scalene block which will be ultrasound and nerve stimulator guided.

Procedure: interscalene block

Suprascapular and Axillary nerve block

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

This arm patients will receive Suprascapular and axillary nerve blocks which will be ultrasound guided and nerve stimulator guided.

Procedure: Suprascapular and Axillary nerve block

Interventions

This arm patients will receive inter scalene block which will be ultrasound and nerve stimulator guided.

Interscalene block

This arm patients will receive Suprascapular and axillary nerve blocks which will be ultrasound guided and nerve stimulator guided.

Suprascapular and Axillary nerve block

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 80 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Elective shoulder arthroscopic rotator cuff repair
  • ASA I - III (American Society of Anaesthesia Classification)

You may not qualify if:

  • ASA IV or higher ( American Society of Anaesthesia Classification)
  • Obesity: BMI \>35
  • Narcotic Abuse/ Drug dependency
  • Major Neurologic deficits
  • Allergy to local anesthetics
  • Infection in the site of the puncture
  • Mental impairment

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (2)

St. Joseph's Health Care

London, Ontario, N6A 4V5, Canada

Location

St. Joseph Hospital

London, Ontario, Canada

Location

Study Officials

  • Shalini Dhir, MD, FRCPC

    Western University, Canada

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Associate Professor, Department of Anaesthesia

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

November 9, 2012

First Posted

November 21, 2012

Study Start

November 1, 2012

Primary Completion

August 1, 2014

Study Completion

August 1, 2014

Last Updated

February 14, 2017

Record last verified: 2017-02

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations