NCT01728285

Brief Summary

Adherence to treatment is crucial to the efficacy of sublingual immunotherapy of allergic diseases. GRAZAX® is a registered drug in Europe, with established efficacy in the treatment of allergic rhinitis, which has to be taken daily by patients. This study was aimed to establish if a device with the characteristics of a mechanical dispenser (Memozax®) could improve adherence to treatment in subjects with hay fever due to allergy to grass

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
261

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for phase_3

Timeline
Completed

Started Mar 2007

Typical duration for phase_3

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

March 1, 2007

Completed
2.3 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

June 1, 2009

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

October 1, 2009

Completed
3.1 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

November 2, 2012

Completed
17 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

November 19, 2012

Completed
Last Updated

November 19, 2012

Status Verified

November 1, 2012

Enrollment Period

2.3 years

First QC Date

November 2, 2012

Last Update Submit

November 14, 2012

Conditions

Keywords

specific allergen immunotherapysublingual immunotherapyallergen tabletscomplianceelectronic compliance device

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • To evaluate if compliance with grass Allergy Immunotherapy Tablet can be increased by providing an electronic compliance device (CED) (Memozax; a tablet-container with a programmable daily acoustic alarm)

    To evaluate if compliance of once daily dosing with Grazax in adult subjects with grass pollen induced allergic rhinoconjunctivitis can be increased by providing patients with an electronic compliance device. Compliance in the two groups (with Memozax and without Memozax) was evaluated by tablet counts

    up to 1 year per patient

Secondary Outcomes (4)

  • Impact of GRAZAX® treatment on QoL as compared to previous season

    up to 1 year per patient

  • Impact of GRAZAX® treatment on allergy symptoms as compared to previous season

    up to 1 year per patient

  • Impact of GRAZAX® on treatment acceptance as compared to previous season

    up to 1 year per patient

  • Recording of all adverse events and serious adverse events

    up to 1 year per patient

Study Arms (2)

Electronic compliance device

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Patients with grass allergy treated with allergen specific immunotherapy (GRAZAX®) using an electronic compliance device (Memozax®)

Device: Electronic compliance device (Memozax®)

No electronic compliance device

NO INTERVENTION

Patients with grass allergy treated with allergen specific immunotherapy (GRAZAX®) without any electronic compliance device (Memozax®)

Interventions

An electronic compliance device is distributed to patients allocated to the active arm

Electronic compliance device

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 65 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • A clinical history of grass pollen-induced allergic rhinoconjunctivitis (with or without asthma) having received treatment during the previous grass pollen season.
  • Positive skin prick test (SPT) response (wheal diameter ≥3mm) to Phleum pratense
  • Positive specific IgE against Phleum pratense (IgE titer \> class 2)

You may not qualify if:

  • Clinical history of chronic sinusitis during the last 2 years or of symptomatic perennial or seasonal allergic rhinitis and/or asthma having received regular medication, due to another allergen during - or potentially overlapping - the grass pollen season.
  • Clinical history of severe asthma (GINA Step 4 and children with Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 second (FEV1) \< 80% of expected value after treatment with inhaled corticosteroids and short-acting β2 agonists)
  • Previous treatment by immunotherapy with grass pollen allergen or any other allergen within the previous 5 years

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo

Pavia, PV, 27100, Italy

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Alesina R, Milani M, Pecora S. A multicenter, randomized, parallel-group trial assessing compliance, tolerability, safety, and efficacy to treatment with grass allergy tablets in 261 patients with grass pollen rhinoconjunctivitis. J Allergy (Cairo). 2012;2012:673502. doi: 10.1155/2012/673502. Epub 2011 Nov 9.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Rhinitis, AllergicPatient Compliance

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

RhinitisNose DiseasesRespiratory Tract DiseasesRespiratory HypersensitivityOtorhinolaryngologic DiseasesHypersensitivity, ImmediateHypersensitivityImmune System DiseasesPatient Acceptance of Health CareTreatment Adherence and ComplianceHealth BehaviorBehavior

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 3
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

November 2, 2012

First Posted

November 19, 2012

Study Start

March 1, 2007

Primary Completion

June 1, 2009

Study Completion

October 1, 2009

Last Updated

November 19, 2012

Record last verified: 2012-11

Locations