Usability and Reliability of a New Physical Therapy Tool
An Evaluation of a Novel Motion Tracking Enabled Knee Physical Therapy Application With Healthy Patients to Assess Reliability and Usability
2 other identifiers
observational
20
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Rehabilitation exercise conducted at home following injury improves clinical and functional outcomes. Optimum compliance with prescribed exercise regimens requires regular patient instruction, performance assessment, monitoring and general encouragement from healthcare staff. Exercise at home though convenient for patients is not conducive for provision of the professional support needed to maximize prescribed regimen effectiveness. Software in development by Reflexion Health Inc. along with the Naval Medical Center San Diego (NMCSD) is being designed to facilitate remote staff-patient interaction during at-home rehabilitative exercise sessions. Microsoft Kinect® will serve as the hardware platform for the designed software package tentatively called, "Reflexion." Kinect® contains a marker-less/controller-less motion tracking camera. The final Reflexion software will rely on a "Rehabilitation Measurement Tool (RMT)" to detect cardinal plane skeletal joint movement and its velocity utilizing the embedded Kinect® camera while also providing patient visual feedback via an avatar on a television screen. In this observational minimal risk study, RMT/Kinect® functional reliability and usability will be assessed. Twenty healthy subjects will physically set-up and turn-on the hardware/software system; receive exercise directions from the RMT; then conduct a series of knee exercises similar to those prescribed after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) repair. An initial limited data set, obtained by Reflexion Health, provided validity and reliability measures. Eighteen degrees of absolute difference was detected between manual goniometry and Kinect® measurements in relevant planes of movement utilized during prescribed ACL exercise. Good relative agreement between RMT and goniometry scores was obtained (ICC = 0.89). A correctable systematic bias toward underestimation by the RMT will allow for future more accurate estimations of joint positioning improving face validity. RMT functional reliability and general usability will be expressed in this study utilizing descriptive statistics and scaled questionnaires. Hardware component malfunction (Kinect® camera, laptop, PC, or LCD television/monitor) as well as RMT internally logged software errors and failure will tallied and measured to ascertain RMT reliability. User-RMT interaction quality will be evaluated with video recordings of each set-up and exercise session. Specifically, usability measures will include: need for additional assistance setting-up or operating the RMT; number of attempts required by the subject to interact with a specific feature: time spent on specific elements during the session. Participant feedback will be elicited post-session using two scaled questionnaires: System Usability Scale (SUS)and Reflexion Usability Scale (RUS). Findings from the study will guide software modifications needed prior to implementation of future clinical studies within the NMCSD population.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
October 1, 2012
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 1, 2012
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 16, 2012
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2012
CompletedNovember 6, 2014
November 1, 2014
2 months
November 1, 2012
November 5, 2014
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Reliability
We have designed and plan to implement a measure, which quantifies the length of time for the subject to set-up and initialize the system which will be used to test inter-reliability of patients using the Reflexion Measurement Tool to complete the exercise protocol. After the patient completes the exercise protocol we will ask the patient to complete the Reflexion Usability Scale to provide their user feedback and experience.
30 minutes, patients followed for duration of set-up, initialization, and completion of RMT exercise protocol
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Usability
30 minutes, patients followed for duration of set-up, initialization, and completion of RMT exercise protocol
Study Arms (1)
Rehabilitation Measurement Tool
This single arm consists of all subjects which will interact with the tool under invstigation.
Interventions
The Rehabilitation Measurement Tool represents a telerehabilitation tool for physical therapy.
Eligibility Criteria
Healthy males and femailes, ages 18-35
You may qualify if:
- Healthy Males and Females
- Age 18-35
You may not qualify if:
- Active knee symptoms
- Enrollment in knee physical therapy within 3 months of evaluation
- External or implanted lower extremity prosthetics
- Administration of regularly scheduled pain medication for lower extremities including oral, topical, or intra-articular routes of delivery
- Surgery or procedures within 3 months prior to enrollment
- Previous History of traumatic Knee Injury that required surgical intervention and/or resulted in baseline knee functional disability
- Pregnant women
- Significant cognitive impairment
- Neurovestibular deficits resulting in impaired balance and proprioception
- Traumatic brain injury
- Loss of function or immobilization of both upper extremities
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Naval Medical Center San Diego
San Diego, California, 92134, United States
Related Publications (30)
Hurley MV, Walsh NE, Mitchell H, Nicholas J, Patel A. Long-term outcomes and costs of an integrated rehabilitation program for chronic knee pain: a pragmatic, cluster randomized, controlled trial. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2012 Feb;64(2):238-47. doi: 10.1002/acr.20642.
PMID: 21954131BACKGROUNDJan MH, Hung JY, Lin JC, Wang SF, Liu TK, Tang PF. Effects of a home program on strength, walking speed, and function after total hip replacement. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004 Dec;85(12):1943-51. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2004.02.011.
PMID: 15605331BACKGROUNDJette DU, Jette AM. Physical therapy and health outcomes in patients with knee impairments. Phys Ther. 1996 Nov;76(11):1178-87. doi: 10.1093/ptj/76.11.1178.
PMID: 8911431BACKGROUNDHarris GR, Susman JL. Managing musculoskeletal complaints with rehabilitation therapy: summary of the Philadelphia Panel evidence-based clinical practice guidelines on musculoskeletal rehabilitation interventions. J Fam Pract. 2002 Dec;51(12):1042-6.
PMID: 12540330BACKGROUNDFischer DA, Tewes DP, Boyd JL, Smith JP, Quick DC. Home based rehabilitation for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1998 Feb;(347):194-9.
PMID: 9520889BACKGROUNDCampbell R, Evans M, Tucker M, Quilty B, Dieppe P, Donovan JL. Why don't patients do their exercises? Understanding non-compliance with physiotherapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the knee. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2001 Feb;55(2):132-8. doi: 10.1136/jech.55.2.132.
PMID: 11154253BACKGROUNDJette AM, Rooks D, Lachman M, Lin TH, Levenson C, Heislein D, Giorgetti MM, Harris BA. Home-based resistance training: predictors of participation and adherence. Gerontologist. 1998 Aug;38(4):412-21. doi: 10.1093/geront/38.4.412.
PMID: 9726128BACKGROUNDFitzgerald GK. Therapeutic exercise for knee osteoarthritis: considering factors that may influence outcome. Eura Medicophys. 2005 Jun;41(2):163-71.
PMID: 16200033BACKGROUNDPisters MF, Veenhof C, van Meeteren NL, Ostelo RW, de Bakker DH, Schellevis FG, Dekker J. Long-term effectiveness of exercise therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee: a systematic review. Arthritis Rheum. 2007 Oct 15;57(7):1245-53. doi: 10.1002/art.23009.
PMID: 17907210BACKGROUNDRand D, Kizony R, Weiss PT. The Sony PlayStation II EyeToy: low-cost virtual reality for use in rehabilitation. J Neurol Phys Ther. 2008 Dec;32(4):155-63. doi: 10.1097/NPT.0b013e31818ee779.
PMID: 19265756BACKGROUNDBurke, J. W. et al. Optimising engagement for stroke rehabilitation using serious games. Vis Comput 25, 1085-1099 (2009).
BACKGROUNDPisters MF, Veenhof C, Schellevis FG, Twisk JW, Dekker J, De Bakker DH. Exercise adherence improving long-term patient outcome in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip and/or knee. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2010 Aug;62(8):1087-94. doi: 10.1002/acr.20182.
PMID: 20235201RESULTZhiqiang Luo; Chee Kian Lim; Weiting Yang; Ke Yen Tee; Kang Li; Chao Gu; Kim Doang Nguen; I-Ming Chen; Song Huat Yeo; ,
RESULTZhou, H. Human motion tracking for rehabilitation--A survey. Biomedical Signal Processing and Control (2008).
RESULTPapastergiou, M. Exploring the potential of computer and video games for health and physical education: A literature review. Computers & Education 53, 603-622 (2009).
RESULTBroeren J, Claesson L, Goude D, Rydmark M, Sunnerhagen KS. Virtual rehabilitation in an activity centre for community-dwelling persons with stroke. The possibilities of 3-dimensional computer games. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2008;26(3):289-96. doi: 10.1159/000149576. Epub 2008 Jul 31.
PMID: 18667809RESULTYu, C. A Study on Technology Acceptance of Applying Wii to Physical Therapy. (2008).
RESULTLange, B., Flynn, S. & Rizzo, A. Initial usability assessment of off-the-shelf video game consoles for clinical game-based motor rehabilitation. Phys. Ther. Rev. 14, 355-363 (2009).
RESULTClark R, Kraemer T. Clinical use of Nintendo Wii bowling simulation to decrease fall risk in an elderly resident of a nursing home: a case report. J Geriatr Phys Ther. 2009;32(4):174-80. doi: 10.1519/00139143-200932040-00006.
PMID: 20469567RESULTHolden, M., Dyar, T. & Schwamm, L. Home-based telerehabilitation using a virtual environment system. (2003)
RESULTRizzo AA, Strickland D, Bouchard S. The challenge of using virtual reality in telerehabilitation. Telemed J E Health. 2004 Summer;10(2):184-95. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2004.10.184.
PMID: 15319048RESULTGövercin, M., Missala, I. M., Marschollek, M. & Steinhagen-Thiessen, E. Virtual Rehabilitation and Telerehabilitation for the Upper Limb. GeroPsych: The Journal of Gerontopsychology and Geriatric Psychiatry 23, 79-90 (2010).
RESULTSigal, L. Articulated Pose Estimation and Tracking: Introduction. Visual Analysis of Humans (2011).
RESULTLange, B., Rizzo, S., Chang, C. & Suma, E. Markerless Full Body Tracking: Depth-Sensing Technology within Virtual Environments. The Interservice/Industry , Simulation & Education Conference (I/ITSEC) (2011).
RESULTLewis GN, Woods C, Rosie JA, McPherson KM. Virtual reality games for rehabilitation of people with stroke: perspectives from the users. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2011;6(5):453-63. doi: 10.3109/17483107.2011.574310. Epub 2011 Apr 17.
PMID: 21495917RESULTRand, D., Kizony, R., Feintuch, U. & Katz, N. Comparison of two VR platforms for rehabilitation: video capture versus HMD. … Teleoperators & Virtual Presence, Vol. 14, No. 2, April 2005, 147-160 (2005). 28. Mumford, N. et al. 2008 Virtual Rehabilitation. 2008 Virtual Rehabilitation 175-180 (2008).
RESULTKizony, R., Katz, N. & Tamar Weiss, P. L. Adapting an immersive virtual reality system for rehabilitation. J. Visual. Comput. Animat. 14, 261-268 (2003).
RESULTBruun, A. Evaluating the Usability of Home Healthcare Applications. Human-Centered Design of E-Health (2010).
RESULTGruchmrnann T. The impact of usability on patient safety. Biomed Instrum Technol. 2005 Nov-Dec;39(6):462-5. doi: 10.2345/0899-8205(2005)39[462:TIOUOP]2.0.CO;2. No abstract available.
PMID: 17432472RESULTFairbanks RJ, Wears RL. Hazards with medical devices: the role of design. Ann Emerg Med. 2008 Nov;52(5):519-21. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2008.07.008. Epub 2008 Aug 22. No abstract available.
PMID: 18722693RESULT
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 1, 2012
First Posted
November 16, 2012
Study Start
October 1, 2012
Primary Completion
December 1, 2012
Last Updated
November 6, 2014
Record last verified: 2014-11