Spinal Cord Stimulation for Pain Relief in Irritable Bowel Syndrome
Spinal Cord Stimulation in the Irritable Bowel Syndrome - a Randomized Cross-over Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
10
1 country
1
Brief Summary
To elucidate Spinal Cord Stimulation (SCS) as treatment for IBS. An SCS system with a 4-polar electrode at the T5-8 level is implanted. In a randomized, cross-over study design, active stimulation is compared to a period without stimulation, with an ensuing tailing stimulation period, twice as long. Patients recorded average pain level, pain attacks, number of diarrheas and global quality of life. At the end of the study patients can choose to retain their SCS stimulation system or have it removed. The outcome of the present trial will show whether SCS is a useful treatment of IBS. The long-term follow-up will show the continuous amelioration of SCS over at least six months.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_1
Started Aug 2005
Longer than P75 for phase_1
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
August 1, 2005
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 30, 2012
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 15, 2012
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 1, 2014
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 1, 2014
CompletedNovember 7, 2018
November 1, 2018
8.7 years
October 30, 2012
November 5, 2018
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
To investigate if typical abdominal pain of IBS can be ameliorated by SCS?
During the whole study period each patient will record the number of pain attacks. Patients are scheduled for regular outpatient controls, at 2, 8, 14, 26 and 28 weeks after implantation
According to protocol for 26 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (1)
To record effects of SCS on diarrhea/constipation
According to protocol for 26 weeks
Other Outcomes (1)
To evaluate quality of life and side effects, feasibility and tolerability of SCS, validated as willingness to retain the stimulation equipment.
According to protocol for 26 weeks
Study Arms (2)
Early off-stimulation (group B)
OTHERLate SCS treatment. After 2 weeks without SCS, randomization to either of two study arms: Group B starting with no SCS for a period of six weeks (A) followed by a period of active SCS (on-period for 6 weeks). Thereafter, free stimulation for 12 weeks, followed by a concluding 2 sweeks of no SCS.
Early on-stimulation (group A)
OTHEREarly SCS treatment. After 2 weeks without SCS, randomization to either of two study arms: Group A starting with SCS for a period of six weeks (A) followed by a period of no SCS (off-period for 6 weeks). Thereafter, free stimulation for 12 weeks, followed by a concluding 2 sweeks of no SCS.
Interventions
Electric stimulation of the spinal cord
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- age 18-60, Rome II criteria, abdominal pain \>4 (0-10 VAS), stable symptoms for \>2 years
You may not qualify if:
- other gastrointestinal disease, somatic or psychiatric co-morbidity
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Uppsala Universitylead
- Medtronics, Inc.collaborator
- Bengt Ihre Foundationcollaborator
- The Swedish Society of Medicinecollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Karolinska University Hospital
Solna, Stockholm County, 17176, Sweden
Related Publications (1)
O'Connell NE, Ferraro MC, Gibson W, Rice AS, Vase L, Coyle D, Eccleston C. Implanted spinal neuromodulation interventions for chronic pain in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Dec 2;12(12):CD013756. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013756.pub2.
PMID: 34854473DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Per M Hellström, MD, PhD
Uppsala University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 1
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor, senior consultant
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 30, 2012
First Posted
November 15, 2012
Study Start
August 1, 2005
Primary Completion
April 1, 2014
Study Completion
April 1, 2014
Last Updated
November 7, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-11