Improvement Assessment of Coronary Flow Dysfunction Using Fundamental Fluid Dynamics
1 other identifier
observational
68
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Diagnosis of relative contributions of large artery blockages and microvascular blockages is very much needed in the treatment of coronary artery disease. In order to achieve this, two novel parameters, pressure drop coefficient (CDP), which combines flow and pressure readings and Lesion flow coefficient (LFC), which combines anatomical details of the lesion with pressure and flow readings, are being investigated.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for all trials
Started Aug 2010
Longer than P75 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
August 1, 2010
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 29, 2012
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 1, 2012
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 30, 2026
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 30, 2026
May 7, 2026
May 1, 2026
16 years
October 29, 2012
May 1, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Quantification of relative contributions of large artery disease and microvascular disease
Correlation Coronary Flow Reserve (CFR) from Positron Emission Tomography (PET)imaging with diagnostic parameters, Pressure Drop Coefficient (CDP) and Lesion Flow Coefficient (LFC).
2 years
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Quantification of relative contributions of large artery disease and microvascular disease
2 years
Study Arms (1)
Cardiac PET, Coronary catheterization
Cardiac PET scan: 1. Injection of N-13 Ammonia radionuclide. 2 doses of 10 milliCuries and 20 milliCuries each. 2. Injection of Lexiscan. Coronary catheterization: 1. Pressure and flow readings using Combowire 2. Injection of Adenosine.
Interventions
Patients would under go a Cardiac rest and stress PET scan and include the following drug administration: 1. N-13 Ammonia radionuclide - Two doses, 10 mCi for rest, 20 mCi for stress 2. Lexiscan - stress agent for PET scan Patients would also undergo Coronary catheterization including the following drug administration and device usage: 1. Combowire to obtain pressure and flow readings on Combomap machine (Volcano Therapeutics, CA). 2. Adenosine - stress agent during catheterization, 140 ug/Kg/min
Eligibility Criteria
Patients with chest pain and suspected ischemia that needs to be assessed by a stress test
You may qualify if:
- years of age or above
- Patients referred to a stress test by a Cardiologist
- Acute Chest pain, as per patient input.
- Risk Assessment with prior test results and/or previous history of known chronic stable CAD.
- Borderline or discordant stress testing where obstructive CAD remains a concern.
- New or worsening symptoms- Abnormal coronary angiography or abnormal prior stress imaging study.
- Coronary stenosis or anatomic abnormality of uncertain significance.
- In absence of reliable diagnostic information from another imaging modality.
You may not qualify if:
- Left ventricular ejection fraction less the 25% determined by gated SPECT imaging
- Non-dialysis dependent chronic kidney disease with baseline serum creatinine greater than 2.5 gm/dL.
- History of type II heparin-induced thrombocytopenia.
- Significant co-morbid condition that is medically unstable and would make coronary angiography prohibitive or contraindicated.
- Pregnant women.
- Incapacitated for Consent
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Cincinnati Veteran Affairs Medical Center
Cincinnati, Ohio, 45220, United States
Related Publications (1)
Banerjee RK, Ramadurai S, Manegaonkar SM, Rao MB, Rakkimuthu S, Effat MA. Comparison Between 5- and 1-Year Outcomes Using Cutoff Values of Pressure Drop Coefficient and Fractional Flow Reserve for Diagnosing Coronary Artery Diseases. Front Physiol. 2021 Jul 14;12:689517. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2021.689517. eCollection 2021.
PMID: 34335296DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Rupak K Banerjee, PhD
University of Cincinnati , CVAMC
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Mohamed Effat, MD
Univesity of Cincinnati, University Hospital
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Imran Arif, MD
University of Cincinnati and University Hospital
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Hanan Kerr, MD
University of Cincinnati
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- OTHER
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 29, 2012
First Posted
November 1, 2012
Study Start
August 1, 2010
Primary Completion (Estimated)
July 30, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
July 30, 2026
Last Updated
May 7, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-05