Vapocoolant (Pain Ease) Use for Venipuncture
Prospective, Randomized, Blinded,Comparative Efficacy and Safety Trial of Vapocoolant (Pain Ease Medium Stream) for Venipuncture
1 other identifier
interventional
100
1 country
1
Brief Summary
To determine the efficacy and safety of vapocoolant spray (Pain Ease Medium Stream) in decreasing the pain of venipuncture ("blood draw")
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable pain
Started Apr 2011
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
April 1, 2011
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 1, 2012
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 1, 2012
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 4, 2012
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 24, 2012
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
December 11, 2014
CompletedAugust 29, 2025
August 1, 2025
10 months
October 4, 2012
January 9, 2014
August 11, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Pain Scale on Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) ( 0 to 10)
NRS scale: 0-10 ; No pain (0) - (5) moderate pain - Worst pain (10)
Less than 10 minutes after stream application.
Study Arms (2)
Vapocoolant (Pain Ease Medium Stream )
ACTIVE COMPARATORApplication of Vapocoolant (Pain Ease Medium Stream) for 4-10 seconds onto venipuncture site.
Nature's Tears Sterile Water
PLACEBO COMPARATORApplication of sterile water stream (nature's tears) for 4-10 seconds onto the venipuncture site.
Interventions
Topical stream 4-10 seconds duration to skin.
Topical stream 4-10 seconds duration to skin
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patient needing venipuncture ("blood draw') but not intravenous cannulation
- Adult 18 years and older up to and and including 80 years old
- Stable patient
- Mentally competent patient able to understand the consent form
You may not qualify if:
- Patients with any allergies to the spray components (e.g. 1,1,1,3,3 pentafluoropropane or 1,1,1,2, tetrafluoroethane )
- Critically ill or unstable (e.g. sepsis or shock)
- Extremes of age: geriatric (\> 80 years) or pediatric ( \< 18 years old)
- Pregnant
- Venipuncture site located in area of compromised blood supply. Examples include : patients with peripheral vascular disease, gangrene, Raynaud's disease, Buerger's disease.
- Venipuncture site located in area of insensitive skin; patients with a peripheral neuropathy including diabetic neuropathy.
- Patient intolerant of cold or with hypersensitivity to the cold.
- Patient unable or unwilling to give consent.
- Prior experience with vapocoolant spray
- Currently in another research trial
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- The Cleveland Cliniclead
- Gebauer Companycollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Cleveland Clinic
Cleveland, Ohio, 44195, United States
Related Publications (3)
Farion KJ, Splinter KL, Newhook K, Gaboury I, Splinter WM. The effect of vapocoolant spray on pain due to intravenous cannulation in children: a randomized controlled trial. CMAJ. 2008 Jul 1;179(1):31-6. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.070874.
PMID: 18591524BACKGROUNDHijazi R, Taylor D, Richardson J. Effect of topical alkane vapocoolant spray on pain with intravenous cannulation in patients in emergency departments: randomised double blind placebo controlled trial. BMJ. 2009 Feb 10;338:b215. doi: 10.1136/bmj.b215.
PMID: 19208703BACKGROUNDMace SE. Prospective, randomized, double-blind controlled trial comparing vapocoolant spray vs placebo spray in adults undergoing venipuncture. Am J Emerg Med. 2016 May;34(5):798-804. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2016.01.002. Epub 2016 Jan 7.
PMID: 26979261DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
This study enrolled only adults. No pediatric patients were enrolled. However, an earlier study by Farion KJ et al in CMAJ in 2008 found that the use of a vapocoolant (pain-ease) significantly decreased the pain of intravenous cannulation in children
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr. Sharon E. Mace, Director of Research, ESI
- Organization
- Cleveland Clinic
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Sharon E. Mace, M.D.
The Cleveland Clinic
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 4, 2012
First Posted
October 24, 2012
Study Start
April 1, 2011
Primary Completion
February 1, 2012
Study Completion
February 1, 2012
Last Updated
August 29, 2025
Results First Posted
December 11, 2014
Record last verified: 2025-08
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share