Regadenoson Stress-MRI to Identify Coronary Artery Disease in Atrial Fibrillation Patients
RECAD-AF
Detection of Coronary Artery Disease in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation Using Regadenoson Stress MRI
1 other identifier
interventional
30
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is growing into an epidemic affecting 1 in 4 adults. There is a need for research to elucidate the prevalence of ischemic cardiomyopathy in patients diagnosed with AF. The objective of this study is to demonstrate the utility of MRI in assessment of coronary artery disease. The specific objective is to demonstrate sensitivity/specificity comparable to that reported in meta-analyses of non-AF patients and adenosine (90% /80%) in an AF population using the time-efficient vasodilator regadenoson that requires only a single intravenous (IV).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_2 atrial-fibrillation
Started Jan 2013
Longer than P75 for phase_2 atrial-fibrillation
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 2, 2012
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 19, 2012
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2013
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 1, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 1, 2016
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
November 7, 2017
CompletedDecember 13, 2017
November 1, 2017
3.8 years
October 2, 2012
October 11, 2017
November 17, 2017
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Sensitivity of Regadenoson Stress-MRI for Detection of Coronary Artery Disease (CAD)
Determination of sensitivity of Regadenoson stress-MRI in the detection of CAD, using x-ray angiography as the standard. Perfusion images interpreted by three blinded readers as normal or abnormal; majority results of the three blinded readers are reported.
one MRI, up to 1 hour
Specificity of Regadenoson Stress-MRI for Detection of Coronary Artery Disease (CAD)
Determination of specificity of Regadenoson stress-MRI in the detection of CAD, using x-ray angiography as the standard. Perfusion images interpreted by three blinded readers as normal or abnormal; majority results of the three blinded readers are reported.
one MRI, up to 1 hour
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Accuracy of Regadenoson Stress-MRI for Detection of Coronary Artery Disease (CAD)
one MRI, up to 1 hour
Study Arms (1)
Regadenoson MRI
EXPERIMENTALParticipants with AF receiving regadenoson stress MRI, using Gadobenate dimeglumine
Interventions
AF patients will be provided with a regadenoson stress MRI to see if coronary artery disease can be detected with more sensitivity /specificity.
Resting perfusion with Multihance Gd-BOPTA contrast agent will be performed first, then a regadenoson injection will be given and MR imaging performed with a Gd-BOPTA contrast agent bolus 60-100 seconds later.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients with confirmed persistent or paroxysmal AF and suspected coronary artery disease who will undergo catheterization X-ray angiography
You may not qualify if:
- Critically ill patients, patients on ventilators patients with hypotension, asthmatics, and other patients whose medical care or safety may be compromised from undergoing an MRI examination will be excluded.
- Patients with claustrophobia will also be excluded since MRI is conducted in a closed environment.
- Patients with contraindications to MRI (pacemaker, metal implants).
- Pregnant subjects (or women who may become pregnant), minors, and prisoners will be excluded from this study.
- Subjects are over 60 or have any suspicion of abnormal kidney function (a blood test to determine Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) will be performed prior to imaging. Subjects with GFR\<30 will be excluded from the study. This is standard practice for clinical scans in Radiology due to the extremely small but not negligible relationship between gadolinium contrast agent and nephrogenic systemic fibrosis in patients with severely impaired renal function.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University of Utah
Salt Lake City, Utah, 84132, United States
Related Publications (11)
Lloyd-Jones DM, Wang TJ, Leip EP, Larson MG, Levy D, Vasan RS, D'Agostino RB, Massaro JM, Beiser A, Wolf PA, Benjamin EJ. Lifetime risk for development of atrial fibrillation: the Framingham Heart Study. Circulation. 2004 Aug 31;110(9):1042-6. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000140263.20897.42. Epub 2004 Aug 16.
PMID: 15313941BACKGROUNDNucifora G, Schuijf JD, Tops LF, van Werkhoven JM, Kajander S, Jukema JW, Schreur JH, Heijenbrok MW, Trines SA, Gaemperli O, Turta O, Kaufmann PA, Knuuti J, Schalij MJ, Bax JJ. Prevalence of coronary artery disease assessed by multislice computed tomography coronary angiography in patients with paroxysmal or persistent atrial fibrillation. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2009 Mar;2(2):100-6. doi: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.108.795328. Epub 2009 Jan 26.
PMID: 19808575BACKGROUNDAbidov A, Hachamovitch R, Rozanski A, Hayes SW, Santos MM, Sciammarella MG, Cohen I, Gerlach J, Friedman JD, Germano G, Berman DS. Prognostic implications of atrial fibrillation in patients undergoing myocardial perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004 Sep 1;44(5):1062-70. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2004.05.076.
PMID: 15337220BACKGROUNDSmit MD, Tio RA, Slart RH, Zijlstra F, Van Gelder IC. Myocardial perfusion imaging does not adequately assess the risk of coronary artery disease in patients with atrial fibrillation. Europace. 2010 May;12(5):643-8. doi: 10.1093/europace/eup404. Epub 2009 Dec 17.
PMID: 20022875BACKGROUNDNandalur KR, Dwamena BA, Choudhri AF, Nandalur MR, Carlos RC. Diagnostic performance of stress cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in the detection of coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007 Oct 2;50(14):1343-53. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2007.06.030. Epub 2007 Sep 17.
PMID: 17903634BACKGROUNDHamon M, Fau G, Nee G, Ehtisham J, Morello R, Hamon M. Meta-analysis of the diagnostic performance of stress perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance for detection of coronary artery disease. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2010 May 19;12(1):29. doi: 10.1186/1532-429X-12-29.
PMID: 20482819BACKGROUNDAblitt NA, Gao J, Keegan J, Stegger L, Firmin DN, Yang GZ. Predictive cardiac motion modeling and correction with partial least squares regression. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2004 Oct;23(10):1315-24. doi: 10.1109/TMI.2004.834622.
PMID: 15493698BACKGROUNDS. E. Litwin, J. Fluckiger, L. Chen, T. H. Kim, N. Pack, B. Matthews, C. McGann, R. Jiji, et al. Does fixed-dose regadenoson induce comparable myocarial perfusion reserve in patients of widely varying body size? A quantitative MRI study. American Heart Association, chicago, 2010.
BACKGROUNDO. J. Booker, P. Bandettini, P. Kellman, J. Wilson, S. Leung, S. Vasu, S. Shanbhag, J. Henry, et al. Time resolved measure of coronary sinus flow following regadenoson administration. Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance, 13(1): O74, 2011.
BACKGROUNDHarper R, Reeves B. Reporting of precision of estimates for diagnostic accuracy: a review. BMJ. 1999 May 15;318(7194):1322-3. doi: 10.1136/bmj.318.7194.1322. No abstract available.
PMID: 10323817BACKGROUNDBieging ET, Haider I, Adluru G, Chang L, Suksaranjit P, Likhite D, Shaaban A, Jensen L, Wilson BD, McGann CJ, DiBella E. Rapid rest/stress regadenoson ungated perfusion CMR for detection of coronary artery disease in patients with atrial fibrillation. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017 Nov;33(11):1781-1788. doi: 10.1007/s10554-017-1168-1. Epub 2017 May 20.
PMID: 28528431DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Edward DiBella, Ph.D.
- Organization
- University of Utah, Dept. of Radiology Research
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Brent Wilson, MD
University of Utah
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Associate Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 2, 2012
First Posted
October 19, 2012
Study Start
January 1, 2013
Primary Completion
October 1, 2016
Study Completion
October 1, 2016
Last Updated
December 13, 2017
Results First Posted
November 7, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-11