Short and Medium-term Effects of Manual Therapy on Latent Myofascial Pain
1 other identifier
interventional
117
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study was to investigate the short and medium-term effects of three manual techniques on cervical range of motion and pressure pain sensitivity in subjects with mechanical stress, presenting latent trigger point of upper trapezius muscle.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Sep 2011
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2011
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 1, 2012
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 1, 2012
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 12, 2012
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 18, 2012
CompletedOctober 18, 2012
October 1, 2012
6 months
October 12, 2012
October 16, 2012
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Change from Baseline in Pressure pain threshold at 10 minutes after the intervention
To obtain the pressure pain threshold measurements, an electronic pressure algometer was used. With the subject seated, the evaluator placed the pointer on the trigger pint with an approximate angle of 90º and an increasing pressure of approximately 1 kg/cm²/s. Subjects were told to use the word "now" whenever the sensation of pressure was replaced by a sensation of pain. At this point, the evaluator removed the algometer and the equipment recorded the maximum applied pressure.
10 minutes after the intervention
Change from Baseline in Pressure pain threshold at 24 hours after the intervention
To obtain the pressure pain threshold measurements, an electronic pressure algometer was used. With the subject seated, the evaluator placed the pointer on the trigger pint with an approximate angle of 90º and an increasing pressure of approximately 1 kg/cm²/s. Subjects were told to use the word "now" whenever the sensation of pressure was replaced by a sensation of pain. At this point, the evaluator removed the algometer and the equipment recorded the maximum applied pressure.
24 hours after the intervention
Change from Baseline in Pressure pain threshold at one week after the intervention
To obtain the pressure pain threshold measurements, an electronic pressure algometer was used. With the subject seated, the evaluator placed the pointer on the trigger pint with an approximate angle of 90º and an increasing pressure of approximately 1 kg/cm²/s. Subjects were told to use the word "now" whenever the sensation of pressure was replaced by a sensation of pain. At this point, the evaluator removed the algometer and the equipment recorded the maximum applied pressure.
one week after the intervention
Secondary Outcomes (21)
Change from Baseline in Cervical flexion at 10 minutes after the intervention
10 minutes after the intervention
Change from Baseline in Cervical extension at 10 minutes after the intervention
10 minutes after the intervention
Change from Baseline in Cervical side flexion (homo-lateral of trigger point) at 10 minutes after the intervention
10 minutes after the intervention
Change from Baseline in Cervical rotation (homo-lateral of trigger point) at 10 minutes after the intervention
10 minutes after the intervention
Change from Baseline in Cervical side flexion (contra-lateral of trigger point) at 10 minutes after the intervention
10 minutes after the intervention
- +16 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (5)
Muscle energy technique
EXPERIMENTALIn each volunteer, the therapist identified the latent trigger point on the upper trapezius. A questionnaire about general information was performed. And the maximum homolateral side flexion of the trigger point was measured. On the following week, the blind assessor performed the pre-intervention measurements of pressure pain threshold, pressure pain perception and cervical range of motions. Next, the therapist performed the muscle energy technique of the upper trapezius muscle. Then, all measurements, before described, were repeated, by the assessor, after 10 minutes, 24 hours and one week.
Ischemic compression technique
EXPERIMENTALIn each volunteer, the therapist identified the latent trigger point on the upper trapezius. A questionnaire about general information was performed. And the maximum homolateral side flexion of the trigger point was measured. On the following week, the blind assessor performed the pre-intervention measurements of pressure pain threshold, pressure pain perception and cervical range of motions. Next, the therapist performed ischemic compression technique on the latent trigger point. Then, all measurements, before described, were repeated, by the assessor, after 10 minutes, 24 hours and one week.
Passive stretching technique
EXPERIMENTALIn each volunteer, the therapist identified the latent trigger point on the upper trapezius. A questionnaire about general information was performed. And the maximum homolateral side flexion of the trigger point was measured. On the following week, the blind assessor performed the pre-intervention measurements of pressure pain threshold, pressure pain perception and cervical range of motions. Next, the therapist performed the passive stretching of the upper trapezius muscle. Then, all measurements, before described, were repeated, by the assessor, after 10 minutes, 24 hours and one week.
Sham technique
SHAM COMPARATORIn each volunteer, the therapist identified the latent trigger point on the upper trapezius. A questionnaire about general information was performed. And the maximum homolateral side flexion of the trigger point was measured. On the following week, the blind assessor performed the pre-intervention measurements of pressure pain threshold, pressure pain perception and cervical range of motions. Next, for the sham technique, the therapist only contacted with his hands the head and the shoulder of the subject, without executing any movement, for 30 seconds. Then, all measurements, before described, were repeated, by the assessor, after 10 minutes, 24 hours and one week.
No intervention group
NO INTERVENTIONIn each volunteer, the therapist identified the latent trigger point on the upper trapezius. A questionnaire about general information was performed. And the maximum homolateral side flexion of the trigger point was measured. On the following week, the blind assessor performed the pre-intervention measurements of pressure pain threshold, pressure pain perception and cervical range of motions. Next,the subject was lying for 30 seconds, without intervention. Then, all measurements, before described, were repeated, by the assessor, after 10 minutes, 24 hours and one week.
Interventions
The therapist, with one hand on the occipital bone and the other on the shoulder, performed passive side flexion, contralateral to the muscle, taking the subject's head until the end-feel. Then, subjects performed an isometric contraction of 25% of their maximum force, for 5 seconds, while the therapist offered manual resistance. Afterwards the subject was let to relax in this position for additional 5 seconds. Side flexion was now increased until a new end-feel point was reached. This sequence was repeated 3 times. At the end, the therapist passively guided the cervical segment to the neutral position.
The therapist, with one hand on the occipital bone and the other on the shoulder, performed a contralateral side flexion of the muscle passively until the maximum obtainable amplitude was reached, while subjects were asked to breathe steadily. During the breathing phase the therapist increased the side flexion until the end of the obtainable amplitude, this position was maintained. This procedure was repeated during 30 seconds. Finally the therapist passively guided the cervical segment to the neutral position.
The therapist, with a pincer contact, applied gradual pressure on the latent trigger point of the upper trapezius muscle. Subjects had been previously asked to say when pain was "moderate but bearable", a pain value of 7 in a 1 to 1o scale of pain (in which 1 corresponds to "no pain" and 10 do "unbearable pain"). At this point, pressure was maintained until pain levels were reduced to level 3. The therapist increased once more the pressure until the level of pain was 7 again. This procedure was repeated during 90 seconds.
The therapist was seated at the head of the treatment table, and with one hand on the occipital bone and the other on the shoulder, without executing any movement, for 30 seconds.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- volunteers with 18 or more years of age
- with a palpable latent trigger point in the fibbers of the upper trapezius muscle
- with an average time of computer work of at least 2h/day.
You may not qualify if:
- with a body mass index (BMI) equal or higher than 31 kg/cm2
- with bilateral latent triggers in the fibers of the upper trapezius muscle
- have done any pharmacological therapeutic during any of the 7 days before the study or anti-coagulant therapeutics
- have done any treatment at cervical region during the month before the study
- having cardio-respiratory, neurological, neuro-musculoskeletal, oncologic or systemic pathologies
- having cognitive deficits or psychologic/psychiatric disturbances
- be pregnant
- having a clinical history of cervical, high dorsal, shoulder or cranial surgery or trauma during the prior 12 months.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Escola Superior de Tecnologia da Saúde do Porto
Vila Nova de Gaia, Porto District, 4400-330, Portugal
Related Publications (4)
Simons DG. New views of myofascial trigger points: etiology and diagnosis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008 Jan;89(1):157-9. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2007.11.016.
PMID: 18164347BACKGROUNDFernandez-de-Las-Penas C, Simons D, Cuadrado ML, Pareja J. The role of myofascial trigger points in musculoskeletal pain syndromes of the head and neck. Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2007 Oct;11(5):365-72. doi: 10.1007/s11916-007-0219-z.
PMID: 17894927BACKGROUNDSimons DG. Review of enigmatic MTrPs as a common cause of enigmatic musculoskeletal pain and dysfunction. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2004 Feb;14(1):95-107. doi: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2003.09.018.
PMID: 14759755BACKGROUNDGe HY, Arendt-Nielsen L. Latent myofascial trigger points. Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2011 Oct;15(5):386-92. doi: 10.1007/s11916-011-0210-6.
PMID: 21559783BACKGROUND
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Natália MO Campelo
Escola Superior de Tecnologia da Saúde do Porto
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 12, 2012
First Posted
October 18, 2012
Study Start
September 1, 2011
Primary Completion
March 1, 2012
Study Completion
March 1, 2012
Last Updated
October 18, 2012
Record last verified: 2012-10