Loading search results
IMPROVING MEASUREMENT OF PARENTS' UNDERSTANDING OF RESEARCH PERMISSION
Sponsor study identifier
interventional
32
1 country
2
Study Start
March 30, 2012
Actual (reported)Primary Completion
December 31, 2017
Actual (reported)Study Completion
April 30, 2019
Actual (reported)Well-informed potential subjects are presumably better able to make autonomous decisions about the risks and benefits of participating in a research study than those in possession of less information. In actuality, prior research into consent understanding suggests that longer forms offering exhaustive information may inhibit rather than promote understanding. Moreover, technical wording in tools used to measure parent understanding of research permission may also lead to inhibition of understanding. This study will test the hypothesis that, among parents of potential subjects for greater-than-minimal-risk research, two modified and simplified subset of questions from the Deaconess Informed Consent Comprehension Test (DICCT), one oral and open-ended and one written and multiple choice, will increase subject understanding of the nature and risks of the research. The study will enroll the parents of 40 potential neonatal research subjects with an interim analysis of data at 20 subjects. Subjects will review a sham research permission form and will be randomized 1:1 to complete one of the two modified comprehension tests in addition to the DICCT (gold-standard) test. Parents will be given an open-ended survey after the tests in order to qualitatively describe their opinions of each test. A subset of parents who have received the written form will also undergo a cognitive interview about the form. A similar subset will also be given an open-ended survey about a proposed permission form cover sheet. The primary outcome will be the correlation of scores between the DICCT and modified comprehension tests, following the sham informed consent process.
Registry-reported information. Elapsed time and enrollment totals alone do not measure study progress or recruitment pace.
April 30, 2019
Actual (reported)Click on a node to explore related trials.
Some registry-reported names shown below are not yet linked in this graph.
Dates and qualifiers reported by the registry. Estimated dates do not confirm that a milestone has occurred.
March 30, 2012
Actual (reported)October 4, 2012
Actual (reported)October 11, 2012
Actual (reported)December 31, 2017
Actual (reported)April 30, 2019
Actual (reported)DICCT Questionnaire
Score on the post-permission DICCT questionnaire. The DICCT is scored on a 28 point scale, with each of 14 parameters being scored as 0 = incorrect, 1 = partially correct, 2 = correct. The DICCT, in addition to being previously validated, has other advantages. It contains questions that are not directly addressed in the cover sheet, but addressed in the full permission form, such as compensation for injury. These items will serve as valuable internal controls. The DICCT is easily adaptable to written answers, which makes it ideal for further modification in future studies. The DICCT will be administered during a structured interview, without a time limit. The parent will be allowed to refer to the permission form to answer the questions.
Within 2 weeks after being approached for participation.
Coversheet attached to Informed Consent.
Standard, full permission form, without the coversheet.
The intervention is a one page cover sheet to be affixed to the front of the standard permission form for the trial for which permission is being sought (attached to application). The form will identify the study as research and contain sections that include investigator contact information, the purpose of the study, a brief description of the study procedures, the alternatives, the voluntary nature, the risks, the potential benefits, a discussion of privacy and confidentiality, the costs and the payments. Each topic will also contain a reference to the page in the consent containing the full description of the topic. The form is designed to have a reading level no higher than 6th to 8th grade. Parents will also receive the full permission form, and all required signatures will still be collected on the permission form.
Registry-reported names are shown in full. Names without a link have not yet been matched to a Syfrah profile.
Women and Children's Hospital of Buffalo
Buffalo, New York, 14222, United States
Ann Marie Scorsone
Rochester, New York, 14642, United States
D'Angio CT, Wang H, Hunn JE, Pryhuber GS, Chess PR, Lakshminrusimha S. Permission form synopses to improve parents' understanding of research: a randomized trial. J Perinatol. 2017 Jun;37(6):735-739. doi: 10.1038/jp.2017.26. Epub 2017 Mar 30.
Carl T D'Angio, MD
University of Rochester
32 participants (actual enrollment reported by the registry).
First Submitted
October 4, 2012
First Posted
October 11, 2012
Study Start
March 30, 2012
Actual (reported)Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Primary Completion
December 31, 2017
Actual (reported)Study Completion
April 30, 2019
Actual (reported)Last Updated
July 8, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-07
Download the complete ClinicalTrials.gov record imported by Syfrah, including fields not shown in this page. The registry may contain a newer revision.
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov.
JSON downloads include source attribution and retrieval details alongside the unchanged original record or the separately normalized values.
Source retrieved: