Real-world Effectiveness and Cost-effectiveness of HFA-beclometasone Compared With ICS/LABA Combination Therapy
QvarvsCombo
A Retrospective Evaluation of Effectiveness and Cost-effectiveness of Extrafine HFA-BDP Compared With Combination ICS/LABA Therapy in the Management of Asthma in a Representative Population of UK Primary Care Patients
1 other identifier
observational
815,377
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study will compare the effectiveness, cost-effectiveness and direct healthcare costs of asthma management in patients with evidence of persistent asthma following an increase in asthma therapy in the form of either an increased dose of inhaled glucocorticosteroids (ICS) using extrafine hydrofluoroalkane-beclometasone dipropionate (HFA-BDP) via pressurised metered-dose inhaler (pMDI) or breath-actuated inhaler (BAI), or a change to combination ICS plus long-acting bronchodilator (LABA) therapy using fixed combinations (fluticasone propionate / salmeterol \[FP/SAL\] or budesonide / formoterol \[BUD/FOR\]) or separate pMDIs and BAIs.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started Jan 1991
Longer than P75 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 1991
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2007
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 1, 2010
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 28, 2012
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 2, 2012
CompletedOctober 4, 2012
October 1, 2012
16.4 years
September 28, 2012
October 3, 2012
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Proxy asthma control
* No recorded hospital attendance for asthma including admission, Accident \& Emergency (A\&E) attendance, out of hours attendance or Out-Patient Department (OPD) attendance, AND * No prescriptions for oral steroid, AND * No consultations, hospital admissions or A\&E attendance for lower respiratory tract infections (LRTI) requiring antibiotics
One-year outcome period
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Success of therapeutic regimen
One-year outcome period
Success of therapeutic regimen (sensitivity - independent of cost saving)
One-year outcome period
average SABA daily dose during outcome year
One-year outcome period
Hospitalisations
One-year outcome period
Study Arms (3)
Step-up as FDC ICS/LABA
ICS asthma patients who increased therapy as FDC ICS/LABA (no increase in daily ICS dose).
Step up as separate therapies
ICS asthma patients who increased therapy as ICS / LABA via separate pMDI and / or BAI inhalers (no increase in daily ICS dose).
Qvar step-up
ICS asthma patients who increased therpy as extra-fine hydrofluoroalkane-beclometasone dipropionate
Interventions
Increase in the baseline BDP-equivalent dose of inhaled corticosteroid as HFA-BDP via pMDI or BAI
A step-up from baseline ICS therapy via the addition of a separate long-acting beta-agonist with no change in baseline ICS drug or dose
Eligibility Criteria
Primary care asthma patients who were receiving ICS therapy (any of BDP, extrafine BDP-HFA, BUD or FP as pMDI or BAI) who, at an index prescription date, underwent either: (i) an increase in ICS as extrafine HFA-BDP (pMDI or BAI); (ii) a change to combination therapy with a separate LABA pMDI or BAI (no change in drug, device or daily BDP-equivalent dose) (iii) a change to combination therapy via a fixed-combination inhaler (with no increase in daily BDP-equivalent dose).
You may qualify if:
- Aged: 4-60 years:
- Paediatric cohort (aged 4-11 years), and
- Adult cohort (aged 12-60 years)
- Aged 61-80 years and never smoked for an additional elderly cohort;
- Evidence of asthma: i.e. a diagnostic code of asthma or at least 2 asthma prescriptions, including one ICS prescription, at different points in time during the year prior to IPD (the baseline year)
- Be on current asthma therapy: i.e. at least 1 asthma prescription in the year prior to IPD, and at least 1 other asthma prescription during the same period
- Have at least one year of up-to-standard (UTS) baseline data (prior to the IPD) and at least one year of UTS outcome data (following the IPD).
You may not qualify if:
- had a diagnostic read code for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) at any time
- had a diagnostic read code for chronic respiratory disease at any time (other than asthma)
- any patients receiving a combination inhaler in addition to their separate ICS inhaler in the baseline year
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
General Practice Research Database
London, London, United Kingdom
Related Publications (8)
Herland K, Akselsen JP, Skjonsberg OH, Bjermer L. How representative are clinical study patients with asthma or COPD for a larger "real life" population of patients with obstructive lung disease? Respir Med. 2005 Jan;99(1):11-9. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2004.03.026.
PMID: 15672843BACKGROUNDTravers J, Marsh S, Caldwell B, Williams M, Aldington S, Weatherall M, Shirtcliffe P, Beasley R. External validity of randomized controlled trials in COPD. Respir Med. 2007 Jun;101(6):1313-20. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2006.10.011. Epub 2006 Nov 17.
PMID: 17113277BACKGROUNDAppleton SL, Adams RJ, Wilson DH, Taylor AW, Ruffin RE; North West Adelaide Cohort Health Study Team. Spirometric criteria for asthma: adding further evidence to the debate. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2005 Nov;116(5):976-82. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2005.08.034.
PMID: 16275363BACKGROUNDExpert Panel Report 3: Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Asthma. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, 2007. (Accessed March 2008, at http://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/guidelines/asthma/asthgdln.pdf
BACKGROUNDAubier M, Wettenger R, Gans SJ. Efficacy of HFA-beclomethasone dipropionate extra-fine aerosol (800 microg day(-1)) versus HFA-fluticasone propionate (1000 microg day(-1)) in patients with asthma. Respir Med. 2001 Mar;95(3):212-20. doi: 10.1053/rmed.2000.1025.
PMID: 11266239BACKGROUNDFairfax A, Hall I, Spelman R. A randomized, double-blind comparison of beclomethasone dipropionate extrafine aerosol and fluticasone propionate. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2001 May;86(5):575-82. doi: 10.1016/S1081-1206(10)62907-9.
PMID: 11379810BACKGROUNDLasserson TJ, Cates CK, Jones AB, Steele EH, White J. Fluticasone versus HFA-beclomethasone dipropionate for chronic asthma in adults and children. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006 Apr 19;2006(2):CD005309. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005309.pub3.
PMID: 16625634BACKGROUNDGross G, Thompson PJ, Chervinsky P, Vanden Burgt J. Hydrofluoroalkane-134a beclomethasone dipropionate, 400 microg, is as effective as chlorofluorocarbon beclomethasone dipropionate, 800 microg, for the treatment of moderate asthma. Chest. 1999 Feb;115(2):343-51. doi: 10.1378/chest.115.2.343.
PMID: 10027430BACKGROUND
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
David Price, Prof. MD
Company Director
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Alison Chisholm, MSc
Research Project Director
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- RETROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- NETWORK
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor David Price
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 28, 2012
First Posted
October 2, 2012
Study Start
January 1, 1991
Primary Completion
June 1, 2007
Study Completion
February 1, 2010
Last Updated
October 4, 2012
Record last verified: 2012-10