Outpatient Control-to-Range: System and Monitoring Testing
Systems Approach to Closed-Loop Control of Type 1 Diabetes at Home
1 other identifier
interventional
5
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Automated closed-loop control (CLC) of blood glucose, known as "artificial pancreas" (AP) can have tremendous impact on the health and lives of people with type 1 diabetes (T1DM). The investigators inter-institutional and international research team has been on the forefront of CLC developments since the beginning of the JDRF Artificial Pancreas initiative in 2006. Thus far, the investigators have conducted three closed-loop control clinical trials (totaling 60 subjects with T1DM), which demonstrated significantly more time in an acceptable "target" blood glucose range during CLC, and significantly fewer hypoglycemic events during CLC compared to open loop. The investigators overall objective is to sequentially test, validate, obtain regulatory approval for, and deploy at home, a closed-loop Control-to-Range (CTR) system comprised of two algorithmic components: a Safety Supervision Module (SSM) and a Hypoglycemia Mitigation Module (HMM). The SSM will monitor the safety of the subject's continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion pump (CSII) to prevent hypoglycemia and will also monitor the integrity of continuous glucose monitor (CGM) data for signal sensor deviations or loss of sensitivity. The HMM will be responsible for the optimal regulation of postprandial hyperglycemic excursions through correction boluses. This study will test the ability of AP Platform to (1) run CTR in an outpatient setting, and (2) be remotely monitored. Specifically, this study involves studying adults with T1DM who are experienced insulin pump users. Subjects will spend two nights (-42 hours) in a local hotel, during which the AP Platform will be remotely monitored in an adjacent hotel room for validation that remote system monitoring can successfully occur. During the study, study subject will be responsible for. operating the CTR system with nursing and technicians available
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Apr 2012
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
April 1, 2012
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 19, 2012
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 2, 2012
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2015
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2015
CompletedApril 21, 2016
April 1, 2016
3.7 years
April 19, 2012
April 20, 2016
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Percent time of active CTR
The main endpoint will be the percent time with all expected data from CGM, pump and patient manual inputs that should be available on Artificial Pancreas platform and monitoring stations. To be considered as successful, this percent time will have to reach more than 80% of total time of investigation.
42 hours
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Frequency analysis of failed data caused by system components
42 hours
Frequency of inaccurate data caused by system components
42 hours
Frequency analysis of lost data caused by system components
42 hours
Study Arms (1)
Control to Range Testing
EXPERIMENTALSubjects will spend two nights in a non hospital setting while the DiAs Diabetes Assistant Wearable Artificial Pancreas Platform is remotely monitored from an adjacent room. DiAs Diabetes Assistant Wearable Artificial Pancreas Platform is composed of an Android-based cell phone platform operating with a DexCom sensor, OmniPod Insulin Management System and an Insulet iDex remote controller. Communication runs on a tablet. The Control to Range software will be capable of transmitting patient state data to a remote monitoring device. The subject will be trained on the open loop features of the cell phone platform user interface: DexCom displays, Insulin injection history display, bolus function. The subject may use the study pump per his/her usual home regimen and may make adjustments to his/her insulin based on symptoms or SMBG readings.
Interventions
Subjects will spend two nights in a non hospital setting while the Artificial Pancreas Device System is remotely monitored from an adjacent room. Artificial Pancreas Device System is composed of an Android-based cell phone platform operating with a DexCom sensor, OmniPod Insulin Management System and an Insulet iDex remote controller. Communication runs on a tablet. The Control to Range software will be capable of transmitting patient state data to a remote monitoring device. The subject will be trained on the open loop features of the cell phone platform user interface: DexCom displays, Insulin injection history display, bolus function. The subject may use the study pump per his/her usual home regimen and may make adjustments to his/her insulin based on symptoms or SMBG readings.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- ≥21 and \<65 years old
- Clinical diagnosis of type 1 diabetes mellitus:
- Criteria for documented hyperglycemia (at least 1 criterion must be met):
- Fasting glucose ≥126 mg/dL - confirmed
- Two-hour OGTT glucose ≥200 mg/dL - confirmed
- HbA1c ≥6.5% documented by history - confirmed
- Random glucose ≥200 mg/dL with symptoms
- No data at diagnosis is available but the participant has a convincing history of hyperglycemia consistent with diabetes
- Criteria for requiring insulin at diagnosis (at least 1 criterion must be met):
- Participant required insulin at diagnosis and continually thereafter
- Participant did not start insulin at diagnosis but upon investigator review likely needed insulin (significant hyperglycemia that did not respond to oral agents) and did require insulin eventually and used continually
- Participant did not start insulin at diagnosis but continued to be hyperglycemic, had positive islet cell antibodies - consistent with latent autoimmune diabetes in adults (LADA) and did require insulin eventually and used continually
- Use of an insulin pump to treat his/her diabetes for at least 1 year
- Actively using an insulin pump with bolus calculator feature including predefined parameters for carbohydrate ratio, insulin sensitivity factor, target BG and active insulin.
- HbA1c between 6.0% - 9.0% as measured with DCA2000 or equivalent device
- +4 more criteria
You may not qualify if:
- ≥21 and \<65 years old
- Clinical diagnosis of type 1 diabetes mellitus:
- Criteria for documented hyperglycemia (at least 1 criterion must be met):
- Fasting glucose ≥126 mg/dL - confirmed
- Two-hour OGTT glucose ≥200 mg/dL - confirmed
- HbA1c ≥6.5% documented by history - confirmed
- Random glucose ≥200 mg/dL with symptoms
- No data at diagnosis is available but the participant has a convincing history of hyperglycemia consistent with diabetes
- Criteria for requiring insulin at diagnosis (at least 1 criterion must be met):
- Participant required insulin at diagnosis and continually thereafter
- Participant did not start insulin at diagnosis but upon investigator review likely needed insulin (significant hyperglycemia that did not respond to oral agents) and did require insulin eventually and used continually
- Participant did not start insulin at diagnosis but continued to be hyperglycemic, had positive islet cell antibodies - consistent with latent autoimmune diabetes in adults (LADA) and did require insulin eventually and used continually
- Use of an insulin pump to treat his/her diabetes for at least 1 year
- Actively using an insulin pump with bolus calculator feature including predefined parameters for carbohydrate ratio, insulin sensitivity factor, target BG and active insulin.
- HbA1c between 6.0% - 9.0% as measured with DCA2000 or equivalent device
- +4 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Sansum Diabetes Research Institutelead
- University of California, Santa Barbaracollaborator
- University of Virginiacollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Sansum Diabetes Research Institute
Santa Barbara, California, 93105, United States
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Howard Zisser, MD
Sansum Diabetes Research Institute
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Director of Clinical Research and Diabetes Technology
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 19, 2012
First Posted
October 2, 2012
Study Start
April 1, 2012
Primary Completion
December 1, 2015
Study Completion
December 1, 2015
Last Updated
April 21, 2016
Record last verified: 2016-04