Safety and Efficacy of Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion Devices
Comparison of Safety and Efficacy of Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion Devices
1 other identifier
observational
169
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common cardiac rhythm disorder in clinical practice. In the last two decades the number of hospitalizations for AF has increased two- to three-fold. More than 6 million people worldwide suffer from atrial fibrillation (AF), a cardiac disorder that results in systemic emboli. Patients with AF are 5 times more likely to have a stroke compared with those without AF. This registry will collection information on two devices that are used to treat AF. The WATCHMAN and LARIAT. The differences in techniques and subsequent effects of the two devices on outcomes related to AF has not been studied. This study will look to compare the two devices to see how the outcomes may vary.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for all trials
Started May 2012
Longer than P75 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2012
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 5, 2012
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 28, 2012
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 1, 2018
CompletedMay 2, 2019
April 1, 2019
5.6 years
July 5, 2012
April 30, 2019
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Effect of LAA occlusion by LARIAT device
This registry will provide data on patient outcomes at different times during follow up. This includes: changes in the appendage size, shape and patients medical history.
Change from Day 0 to Day 90
Effect of LAA occlusion by LARIAT device
This registry will provide data on patient outcomes at different times during follow up.This includes: changes in the appendage size, shape and patients medical history.
Change from Day 0 to 356 post-procedure
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Compare effectiveness of LAA occlusion procedure by evaluating LAA jet velocities
Days 0, 90, 180, 365 post-procedure and annually thereafter
Study Arms (2)
WATCHMAN
Patients that had the WATCHMAN device implanted
LARIAT LAA Device
patients that had LARIAT LAA device implanted
Interventions
The LARIAT snare device is an over-the-wire device guided over the LAA to enable ligation of the LAA. The LARIAT can be opened and closed as desired for ideal positioning without risk of suture deployment.
The WATCHMAN is an expandable device deployed in the LAA via a trans-septal catheter. The implanted device has a self-expanding nitinol frame to secure it in the LAA. The fabric of the WATCHMAN device is permeable to blood.
Eligibility Criteria
Patients who have had a LARIAT LAA device occlusion.
You may qualify if:
- Patients who have had a LARIAT LAA device occlusion
You may not qualify if:
- Patients who have PFO/ASD/critical carotid artery (\>70% blockage) disease and hemorrhagic strokes
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University of Kansas Medical Center
Kansas City, Kansas, 66160, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Dhanunjaya Lakkireddy, MD
University of Kansas Medical Center
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- CASE CONTROL
- Time Perspective
- RETROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 5, 2012
First Posted
September 28, 2012
Study Start
May 1, 2012
Primary Completion
December 1, 2017
Study Completion
February 1, 2018
Last Updated
May 2, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-04