NCT01694511

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to determine whether High Resolution Magnification Endoscopy (HRME) and Computed Virtual Chromoendoscopy (CVC) with targeted biopsies is superior to conventional white light endoscopy (WLE) with 4 quadrant biopsies of the metaplastic epithelium every 1-2 cm (Seattle Protocol) for detection of pre-malignant lesions in patients with Barrett's Esophagus (BE).

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
111

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Nov 2009

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

November 1, 2009

Completed
2.9 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

September 17, 2012

Completed
10 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

September 27, 2012

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

November 1, 2012

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

January 1, 2013

Completed
Last Updated

February 10, 2014

Status Verified

February 1, 2014

Enrollment Period

3 years

First QC Date

September 17, 2012

Last Update Submit

February 7, 2014

Conditions

Keywords

Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Incidence of detected dysplasia by each endoscopic technique.

    Up to 36 months.

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • The yield of low- and/or high-grade dysplasia by each endoscopic technique.

    Up to 36 months.

  • The number of biopsies taken and the duration of the different endoscopic techniques.

    Up to 36 months.

Other Outcomes (1)

  • The endoscopic prediction capability of present dysplasia compared to histopathology for HRME.

    Up to 36 months.

Study Arms (2)

Introductory conventional endoscopy

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Conventional endoscopy followed by HRME+CVC after 30 days.

Procedure: HRME+CVC

Introductory HRME+CVC

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

HRME+CVC followed by conventional endoscopy after 30 days.

Procedure: conventional endoscopy

Interventions

HRME+CVCPROCEDURE

High resolution magnification endoscopy with computed virtual chromoendoscopy and directed biopsy

Introductory conventional endoscopy

Conventional white light endoscopy with four-quadrant biopsy

Introductory HRME+CVC

Eligibility Criteria

Age20 Years - 80 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Presence of specialized intestinal metaplasia in biopsies from the esophagus

You may not qualify if:

  • Dysplasia or cancer

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Sahlgrenska University Hospital

Gothenburg, S-41345, Sweden

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Bratlie SO, Johnsson E, Jonsson C, Fandriks L, Edebo A. Multiple-Band Imaging Provides Better Value Than White-light Endoscopy in Detection of Dysplasia in Patients With Barrett's Esophagus. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015 Jun;13(6):1068-74.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2014.12.007. Epub 2014 Dec 11.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Barrett Esophagus

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Precancerous ConditionsNeoplasmsEsophageal DiseasesGastrointestinal DiseasesDigestive System Diseases

Study Officials

  • Anders F Edebo, MD, PhD

    Dept. Gastrosurgical Research and Education, Inst. Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, Gothenburg, Sweden

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
INVESTIGATOR
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Intervention Model
CROSSOVER
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

September 17, 2012

First Posted

September 27, 2012

Study Start

November 1, 2009

Primary Completion

November 1, 2012

Study Completion

January 1, 2013

Last Updated

February 10, 2014

Record last verified: 2014-02

Locations