NCT01693952

Brief Summary

Treatment of cancer, and more particularly of haematological malignancies, partly relies on chemotherapy. Most therapeutic regimens display various toxicities, one of the most common being haematological toxicity, affecting the three lineages. While anaemia and thrombopenia can be overcome by haematological growth factors and transfusion, one of the most severe life-threatening toxicity is sepsis that develops during neutropenia. Neutropenia, despite the use of granulocyte colony-stimulating factors (G-CSF) and antibiotics, is still a major limitation in chemotherapy which is responsible for the majority of treatment-related morbidity and mortality and for prolonged hospitalisation. In neutropenic patients, sepsis is more frequent and more severe than in non-neutropenic patients. While the occurence of neutropenia and sepsis is often unpredictable and thus difficult to study in a prospective way, stem cell transplantation represents a quite convenient model to study such a question. Autologous stem cell transplantation indications in haematology are mainly multiple myeloma and relapsed lymphoma or Hodgkin disease. Briefly, after a mobilization procedure, a graft of patient's hematopoietic stem cells is collected by cytapheresis and frozen. When the patient has reached complete remission by conventional chemotherapy, he benefits from a very high dose myeloablative chemotherapy (called "conditioning regimen"). The "conditioning regimen" targeted to have high antitumoral activity leads to a "cytokine storm" resulting in a "programmed inflammation". 36 hours after the lasting of the conditioning regimen, the CD34+ cells are thawed and infused to the patient. Thus neutropenia usually begins at D4 post transplantation and lasts for 10 days, until graft becomes "functional". Thus, the timing and duration of neutropenia are very homogeneous. During neutropenia, fever and sepsis are very frequent (\>80% patients), thus, most patient will be informative regarding sepsis, and there is an easy possibility of biological sampling before" programmed inflammation" (due to conditioning regimen), after inflammation before sepsis, then during and after the sepsis. Since the patient is hospitalized, the kinetic monitoring is quite easy

Trial Health

43
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
24

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started May 2012

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

May 1, 2012

Completed
20 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

May 21, 2012

Completed
4 months until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

September 26, 2012

Completed
2.6 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

May 1, 2015

Completed
7 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 1, 2015

Completed
Last Updated

September 1, 2014

Status Verified

August 1, 2014

Enrollment Period

3 years

First QC Date

May 21, 2012

Last Update Submit

August 29, 2014

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • blood samples

    transcriptomic profile identification

    3 YEARS

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • blood samples

    3 YEARS

  • blood samples

    3 YEARS

Study Arms (1)

blood samples

EXPERIMENTAL
Biological: blood draw

Interventions

blood drawBIOLOGICAL
blood samples

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • the criteria required to be candidate in an ASCH in our service(department) (age 18 - 66 years, myélome in 1 ° in reply partial line or lymphoma or complete answer after one 2 ° line, absence of preliminary visceral failure).
  • Informed, willing patients and having given their agreement in writing.

You may not qualify if:

  • Refusal of the patient

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Assistance Publique Hopitaux de Marseille

Marseille, 13354, France

RECRUITING

MeSH Terms

Interventions

Blood Specimen Collection

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Specimen HandlingClinical Laboratory TechniquesDiagnostic Techniques and ProceduresDiagnosisPuncturesSurgical Procedures, OperativeInvestigative Techniques

Study Officials

  • BERNARD BELAIGUES

    Assistance Publique hôpitaux de Marseille

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Central Study Contacts

LAURE FARNAULT

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

May 21, 2012

First Posted

September 26, 2012

Study Start

May 1, 2012

Primary Completion

May 1, 2015

Study Completion

December 1, 2015

Last Updated

September 1, 2014

Record last verified: 2014-08

Locations