Sepsis in Neutropenic Patients: Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation as Model: a Transcriptomic Approach
2 other identifiers
interventional
24
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Treatment of cancer, and more particularly of haematological malignancies, partly relies on chemotherapy. Most therapeutic regimens display various toxicities, one of the most common being haematological toxicity, affecting the three lineages. While anaemia and thrombopenia can be overcome by haematological growth factors and transfusion, one of the most severe life-threatening toxicity is sepsis that develops during neutropenia. Neutropenia, despite the use of granulocyte colony-stimulating factors (G-CSF) and antibiotics, is still a major limitation in chemotherapy which is responsible for the majority of treatment-related morbidity and mortality and for prolonged hospitalisation. In neutropenic patients, sepsis is more frequent and more severe than in non-neutropenic patients. While the occurence of neutropenia and sepsis is often unpredictable and thus difficult to study in a prospective way, stem cell transplantation represents a quite convenient model to study such a question. Autologous stem cell transplantation indications in haematology are mainly multiple myeloma and relapsed lymphoma or Hodgkin disease. Briefly, after a mobilization procedure, a graft of patient's hematopoietic stem cells is collected by cytapheresis and frozen. When the patient has reached complete remission by conventional chemotherapy, he benefits from a very high dose myeloablative chemotherapy (called "conditioning regimen"). The "conditioning regimen" targeted to have high antitumoral activity leads to a "cytokine storm" resulting in a "programmed inflammation". 36 hours after the lasting of the conditioning regimen, the CD34+ cells are thawed and infused to the patient. Thus neutropenia usually begins at D4 post transplantation and lasts for 10 days, until graft becomes "functional". Thus, the timing and duration of neutropenia are very homogeneous. During neutropenia, fever and sepsis are very frequent (\>80% patients), thus, most patient will be informative regarding sepsis, and there is an easy possibility of biological sampling before" programmed inflammation" (due to conditioning regimen), after inflammation before sepsis, then during and after the sepsis. Since the patient is hospitalized, the kinetic monitoring is quite easy
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started May 2012
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2012
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 21, 2012
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 26, 2012
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 1, 2015
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2015
CompletedSeptember 1, 2014
August 1, 2014
3 years
May 21, 2012
August 29, 2014
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
blood samples
transcriptomic profile identification
3 YEARS
Secondary Outcomes (2)
blood samples
3 YEARS
blood samples
3 YEARS
Study Arms (1)
blood samples
EXPERIMENTALInterventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- the criteria required to be candidate in an ASCH in our service(department) (age 18 - 66 years, myélome in 1 ° in reply partial line or lymphoma or complete answer after one 2 ° line, absence of preliminary visceral failure).
- Informed, willing patients and having given their agreement in writing.
You may not qualify if:
- Refusal of the patient
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Assistance Publique Hopitaux de Marseille
Marseille, 13354, France
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
BERNARD BELAIGUES
Assistance Publique hôpitaux de Marseille
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 21, 2012
First Posted
September 26, 2012
Study Start
May 1, 2012
Primary Completion
May 1, 2015
Study Completion
December 1, 2015
Last Updated
September 1, 2014
Record last verified: 2014-08