Study Stopped
lack of sufficient population for recruitment
Wick vs. No Wick: Does Method of Closure Affect Rate of Wound Infection?
Prospective, Randomized Controlled Trial of Wound Management After Ostomy Closure
1 other identifier
interventional
N/A
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Countless children undergo surgery annually for management of what clinicians consider to be a "dirty wound". One frequently encountered example is the ostomy reversal. During this planned operation, the previously diverted small bowel or colon is reconnected with the distal intestine, restoring continuity. However, this procedure leaves an open wound on the anterior abdominal wall, creating a conundrum for the surgeon and raises the question: how should the wound be managed? In the investigators practice at CHOA, surgeons utilize both a wick and a non-wicked wound dressing. In this prospective randomized trial, we wish to evaluate these two dressings in children receiving an ostomy closure. The investigators hypothesis is that the incidence of wound infection after ostomy reversal is the same regardless of if a wick is placed or not.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
Started Jan 2012
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2012
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 20, 2012
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 24, 2012
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2014
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2014
CompletedDecember 17, 2014
December 1, 2014
2.4 years
September 20, 2012
December 16, 2014
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Wound infection
We will be evaluating wound infection rate, as determined by spreading redness, draining pus, fever, increased wound tenderness in the perioperative period.
14 days
Study Arms (2)
Wick
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients with wick placed in their wound at the time of ostomy reversal
No wick
SHAM COMPARATORpatients with non-wicked dressing placed on their wound
Interventions
Once the fascia of the ostomy site is closed, the subcutaneous space will be irrigated with normal saline. The skin will then be reapproximated using an absorbable suture, spaced every 1 cm across the wound (i.e. for a 2cm wound, a single suture will be placed in the middle). A moist, saline/betadine soaked gauze will then be gently packed into the wound spaces, on either side of the sutures. The gauze will be packed into the wound to the depth of ½ a cm, or ½ of the wound depth, whichever is greater. A single dry piece of gauze will then be secured over the top of the wound. Dressings and packing will be removed by the surgical team on post-operative day 2
Once the fascia of the ostomy site is closed, the subcutaneous space will be irrigated with normal saline. The skin will then be reapproximated using an absorbable suture, spaced every 1 cm across the wound (i.e. for a 2 cm wound, a single suture will be placed in the middle). A single piece of dry gauze will then be secured over the top of the wound. Dressings will be removed by the surgical team on post-operative day 2
Eligibility Criteria
You may not qualify if:
- Patients who do not give consent to participate will be excluded from this study. Additionally, if at the time of the operation, the surgeon feels that it is not in the patient's best interest to be randomized and included in the study, he/she may decide to exclude the patient.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Children's Healthcare of Atlanta at Egleston
Atlanta, Georgia, 30022, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Matthew Clifton, MD
Faculty Surgeon
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 20, 2012
First Posted
September 24, 2012
Study Start
January 1, 2012
Primary Completion
June 1, 2014
Study Completion
June 1, 2014
Last Updated
December 17, 2014
Record last verified: 2014-12