Protective Ventilatory Strategy in Severe Acute Brain Injury
PROLABI
1 other identifier
interventional
524
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) occurs in almost 20% of patients with severe acute brain injury and is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. A massive increase in sympathetic activity and an increased production of proinflammatory cytokines released into the systemic circulation are the most important recognized mechanisms. Altered blood brain barrier after injury causes spillover of inflammatory mediators from the brain into the systemic circulation leading to peripheral organs damage. The adrenergic surge induces an increase in vascular hydrostatic pressure and lung capillary permeability, causing an alteration of alveolar capillary barrier with fluid accumulation, resulting in ARDS. The main goal of mechanical ventilation after acute brain injury are the maintenance of optimal oxygenation, and a tight control of carbon dioxide tension, although ventilatory settings to be used to obtain these targets, while avoiding secondary insults to the brain, are not clearly identified. Protective ventilatory strategy has been positively evaluated first in patients with ARDS, and then in those undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass or lung resection surgery, or in brain death organ donors, but data on the effect of protective mechanical ventilation on patients with acute brain injury are still lacking even if this is a population with recognized risk factors for ARDS. Therefore, the primary aim of this multi-center, prospective, randomized, controlled trial is to investigate whether a protective ventilatory strategy, in the early phase after severe acute brain injury, is associated with a lower incidence of ARDS, avoiding any further damage to the brain. Secondary aim is to evaluate if a protective ventilatory strategy is associated with reduced duration of mechanical ventilation, incidence of organ failure, intensive care unit length of stay, and lower concentrations of plasma inflammatory cytokines, without adversely affect in neurological outcome.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Oct 2013
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 12, 2012
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 24, 2012
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
October 1, 2013
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2021
CompletedApril 26, 2021
April 1, 2021
5.2 years
September 12, 2012
April 22, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Proportion of event free survival
Combined end point of "event free survival" defined as survival without ventilator dependency or ARDS\* diagnosis \*ARDS will be defined according to Berlin definition criteria. If chest x-ray is not immediately available, ARDS diagnosis will be suspected and confirmed later on. Interpretation of bilateral infiltrates on chest x-ray and of heart failure vs. fluid overload was variable and in a large observational study (LUNGSAFE, JAMA. 2016 Feb 23;315:788-800) hypoxemic patients with new infiltrates were described as a well-defined group with outcome, risk factors, comorbidities and clinical management similar to ARDS. Therefore, in March 2016 the study protocol replaced "ARDS" with "acute hypoxemic respiratory failure" as one of the components of the composite primary endpoint. Acute hypoxemic respiratory failure was defined as PaO2/FiO2 ratio \< 300, with presence of infiltrates on chest x-ray, independently of lung opacities distribution and characteristics.
28 days
Secondary Outcomes (10)
Number of ventilator free days at 28 days
28 days
number of ICU free days at day 28 after randomization
participants will be followed for the duration of ICU stay, an expected average of 3 weeks
Incidence of ventilator associated pneumonia (VAP)
28 days
Cumulative SOFA free score from the randomization to day 28
28 days
Concentrations of plasma inflammatory cytokines
7 days
- +5 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Conventional Ventilatory Strategy
ACTIVE COMPARATORConventional Ventilatory Strategy
Protective Ventilatory Strategy
EXPERIMENTALProtective ventilatory strategy
Interventions
The conventional strategy will be the standard of care with a lower limit of tidal volume equal to 8 ml/Kg of predicted body weight and with a PEEP of 4 cmH2O
The protective strategy will consist of a tidal volume of 6 ml/Kg of predicted body weight, with a PEEP of 8 cmH2O
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients with severe acute brain injury (traumatic brain injury, subarachnoid haemorrhage, intra-cerebral haemorrhage, and ischemic stroke)
- Patients with not obey commands and do not open eyes on GCS (Glasgow Coma Scale)
- Less than 24 hours of mechanical ventilation (expected \>72 hours)
You may not qualify if:
- Age \< 18 years
- Diagnosis of ARDS before randomization.
- Patients unlikely to survive for the next 24 hours in the opinion of ICU consultant.
- Pregnancy
- Post-anoxic coma
- Metabolic or toxic encephalopathy
- Lack of Informed Consent.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University of Turin - Department of Anesthesia and Intensive care Medicine
Turin, 10126, Italy
Related Publications (1)
Mascia L, Fanelli V, Mistretta A, Filippini M, Zanin M, Berardino M, Mazzeo AT, Caricato A, Antonelli M, Della Corte F, Grossi F, Munari M, Caravello M, Alessandri F, Cavalli I, Mezzapesa M, Silvestri L, Casartelli Liviero M, Zanatta P, Pelosi P, Citerio G, Filippini C, Rucci P, Rasulo FA, Tonetti T. Lung-Protective Mechanical Ventilation in Patients with Severe Acute Brain Injury: A Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial (PROLABI). Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2024 Nov 1;210(9):1123-1131. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202402-0375OC.
PMID: 39288368DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Luciana Mascia, MD, PhD
University of Turin, Italy
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- MD, PhD
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 12, 2012
First Posted
September 24, 2012
Study Start
October 1, 2013
Primary Completion
December 1, 2018
Study Completion
December 1, 2021
Last Updated
April 26, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-04