Evaluation of the Allergenicity of AMPHADASE INJECTION (Hyaluronidase Injection USP)
H001-A2
A Randomized, Double-Blinded, Negative- and Positive-Controlled Study for Evaluation of the Allergenicity of Amphadase® in Healthy Volunteers Using Intradermal Skin Test
1 other identifier
interventional
253
1 country
5
Brief Summary
This study is designed to evaluate the allergenicity of Amphadase® in healthy volunteers using an intradermal skin test.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_2
Started Sep 2012
Shorter than P25 for phase_2
5 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2012
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 13, 2012
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 21, 2012
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 1, 2012
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2012
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
January 20, 2017
CompletedJanuary 20, 2017
January 1, 2017
2 months
September 13, 2012
July 25, 2016
January 18, 2017
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Positive Allergic Reaction to Amphadase® in the Per-Protocol Population (PPP)
Subjects received intradermal injections at 4 injection sites following a randomized configuration of study medications. Injection sites were monitored for any characteristic immediate reactions after the study drug injections. A positive reaction consisted of: a) reaction appearing within 30 minutes of drug placement; b) wheal (\>8 mm) with or without pseudopods; c) reaction accompanying erythema; and d) reaction accompanying localized itching.
Up to 30 minutes after the final study drug injection
Positive Allergic Reaction to Amphadase® in the Intent-to-Treat Population (ITT)
Subjects received intradermal injections at 4 injection sites following a randomized configuration of study medications. Injection sites were monitored for any characteristic immediate reactions after the study drug injections. A positive reaction consisted of: a) reaction appearing within 30 minutes of drug placement; b) wheal (\>8 mm) with or without pseudopods; c) reaction accompanying erythema; and d) reaction accompanying localized itching.
Up to 30 minutes after the final study drug injection
Secondary Outcomes (12)
Observed Wheal Size in the Per-Protocol Population (PPP)
Up to 30 minutes after the final study drug injection
Observed Erythema Size in the Per-Protocol Population (PPP)
Up to 30 minutes after the final study drug injection
Allergic Wheal Size in the Per-Protocol Population (PPP)
Up to 30 minutes after the final study drug injection
Allergic Erythema Size in the Per-Protocol Population (PPP)
Up to 30 minutes after the final study drug injection
Local Itchiness Rate in the Per-Protocol Population (PPP)
Up to 30 minutes after the final study drug injection
- +7 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (3)
Arm H
EXPERIMENTALIntradermal injection of Amphadase (hyaluronidase 150 USP units/mL)
Arm P
ACTIVE COMPARATORIntradermal injection of Histatrol (histamine base 0.1 mg/mL)
Arm N
PLACEBO COMPARATORIntradermal injection of saline (0.02 mL)
Interventions
Subjects received intradermal injections of 0.02 mL Amphadase® (hyaluronidase 150 USP units/mL) at two random sites on their forearms.
Subjects received one intradermal injection of 0.02 mL Histatrol® (histamine base 0.1 mg/mL) at one random sites on their forearms.
Subjects received one intradermal injection of 0.02 mL saline at one random site on their forearm.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- hypothyroidism,
- stable hypertension except those subjects on beta blockers including ocular preparations,
- seasonal/perennial allergic rhinitis if able to wash out of antihistamines,
- stable, mild intermittent asthma (subjects using beta agonists as a monotherapy on an as-needed basis, excluding daily usage),
- migraine if not taking excluded medications,
- mild anxiety/depression if not taking excluded medications, and
- mild arthritic conditions if not taking excluded medications.
- Willingness and ability to sign an informed consent document;
- years of age;
- Intact skin at the forearm ;
- Female participants are currently practicing effective birth control methods or abstinence.
You may not qualify if:
- Known allergy, hypersensitivity or contraindications to hyaluronidase, thimerosal, edetate disodium (EDTA);
- Use of medications within a duration considered to interfere with skin testing.
- Known dermographism which may interfere with skin testing.
- Pregnant or lactating women.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (5)
Amphastar Site 0022
Eugene, Oregon, 97401, United States
Amphastar Site 0023
Lake Oswego, Oregon, 97035, United States
Amphastar Site 0026
Portland, Oregon, 97202, United States
Amphastar Site 0038
Renton, Washington, 98057, United States
Amphastar Site 0034
Seattle, Washington, 98115, United States
Related Publications (13)
Barr J, Kirkpatrick N, Dick A, Leonard L, Hawksworth G, Noble DW. Effects of adrenaline and hyaluronidase on plasma concentrations of lignocaine and bupivacaine after peribulbar anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth. 1995 Dec;75(6):692-7. doi: 10.1093/bja/75.6.692.
PMID: 8672315BACKGROUNDBrydon CW, Basler M, Kerr WJ. An evaluation of two concentrations of hyaluronidase for supplementation of peribulbar anaesthesia. Anaesthesia. 1995 Nov;50(11):998-1000. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1995.tb05940.x.
PMID: 8678264BACKGROUNDAhluwalia HS, Lukaris A, Lane CM. Delayed allergic reaction to hyaluronidase: a rare sequel to cataract surgery. Eye (Lond). 2003 Mar;17(2):263-6. doi: 10.1038/sj.eye.6700243. No abstract available.
PMID: 12640426BACKGROUNDAgrawal A, McLure HA, Dabbs TR. Allergic reaction to hyaluronidase after a peribulbar injection. Anaesthesia. 2003 May;58(5):493-4. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2044.2003.03154_17.x. No abstract available.
PMID: 12694021BACKGROUNDKempeneers A, Dralands L, Ceuppens J. Hyaluronidase induced orbital pseudotumor as complication of retrobulbar anesthesia. Bull Soc Belge Ophtalmol. 1992;243:159-66.
PMID: 1302146BACKGROUNDMinning CA Jr. Hyaluronidase allergy simulating expulsive choroidal hemorrhage. Arch Ophthalmol. 1994 May;112(5):585-6. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1994.01090170029012. No abstract available.
PMID: 8185511BACKGROUNDSzepfalusi Z, Nentwich I, Dobner M, Pillwein K, Urbanek R. IgE-mediated allergic reaction to hyaluronidase in paediatric oncological patients. Eur J Pediatr. 1997 Mar;156(3):199-203. doi: 10.1007/s004310050582.
PMID: 9083759BACKGROUNDAllergy testing. American College of Physicians. Ann Intern Med. 1989 Feb 15;110(4):317-20. No abstract available.
PMID: 2578014BACKGROUNDPoulsen LK. In vivo and in vitro techniques to determine the biological activity of food allergens. J Chromatogr B Biomed Sci Appl. 2001 May 25;756(1-2):41-55. doi: 10.1016/s0378-4347(01)00070-6.
PMID: 11419727BACKGROUNDHoward A, Mercer P, Nataraj HC, Kang BC. Bevel-down superior to bevel-up in intradermal skin testing. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 1997 Jun;78(6):594-6. doi: 10.1016/s1081-1206(10)63222-x.
PMID: 9207725BACKGROUNDBarbaud A, Reichert-Penetrat S, Trechot P, Jacquin-Petit MA, Ehlinger A, Noirez V, Faure GC, Schmutz JL, Bene MC. The use of skin testing in the investigation of cutaneous adverse drug reactions. Br J Dermatol. 1998 Jul;139(1):49-58. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2133.1998.02313.x.
PMID: 9764148BACKGROUNDFisher MM, Bowey CJ. Intradermal compared with prick testing in the diagnosis of anaesthetic allergy. Br J Anaesth. 1997 Jul;79(1):59-63. doi: 10.1093/bja/79.1.59.
PMID: 9301390BACKGROUNDRuzicka T, Gerstmeier M, Przybilla B, Ring J. Allergy to local anesthetics: comparison of patch test with prick and intradermal test results. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1987 Jun;16(6):1202-8. doi: 10.1016/s0190-9622(87)70158-3.
PMID: 3597862BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Gisela Sharp
- Organization
- Amphastar Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Selina Su, MPH
A:mphastar Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- SCREENING
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 13, 2012
First Posted
September 21, 2012
Study Start
September 1, 2012
Primary Completion
November 1, 2012
Study Completion
December 1, 2012
Last Updated
January 20, 2017
Results First Posted
January 20, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-01
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share