Conventional Biopsies vs pCLE for Diagnosis of Superficial Gastric Neoplasia
pCLE
The Accuracy of Probe-based Confocal Endomicroscopy Versus Conventional Biopsies for the Diagnosis of Superficial Gastric Neoplasias
1 other identifier
observational
63
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Confocal endomicroscopy (CLE) allows real-time in-vivo high-resolution and high-magnification imaging of the gastrointestinal epithelium, which is comparable to histopathology. Previous studies have investigated the accuracy of pCLE for diagnosis and differentiated of colorectal polyps, Barrett's esophagus and pancreaticobiliary strictures. However, to date there are limited data exploring the application of pCLE to gastric lesions, and this is the first study comparing the diagnosis of conventional forceps biopsy with that of pCLE using the final specimens obtained from endoscopic resection as a reference standard. The aims of this study were (1) the accuracy of pCLE compared to conventional forceps biopsy using histopathology results following endoscopic resection as a reference, and (2) comparison of "real time" in-vivo pCLE diagnosis with that of blinded "off-line" pCLE diagnosis, and off-line interobserver agreement.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
February 1, 2012
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 1, 2012
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 6, 2012
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 20, 2012
CompletedSeptember 20, 2012
September 1, 2012
7 months
September 6, 2012
September 19, 2012
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
The accuracy of pCLE compared to conventional forceps biopsy
The accuracy of pCLE compared to conventional forceps biopsy was assessed using histopathology results following endoscopic resection as a reference
in-vivo pCLE accuracy compared to conventional forceps biopsy was assessed 1-2 weeks prior to endoscopic resection.
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Comparison of "real time" in-vivo pCLE diagnosis with that of blinded "off-line" pCLE diagnosis.
1-3 months after endoscopic resection and final histopathological analysis
Off-line pCLE interobserver agreement
1-3 months after endoscopic resection and final histopathological analysis
Study Arms (1)
Superficial gastric neoplasia
Patients with superficial gastric neoplasia on diagnostic endoscopy, recieved both conventional endoscopic forcpes biopsies and pCLE. All patients were subject to endoscopic resection of the lesion.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
Consecutive patients referred to a tertiary medical center for endoscopic resection of gastric superficial lesions.
You may qualify if:
- Patients with biospy proven superficial gastric neoplasia, suitable for endoscopic resection.
You may not qualify if:
- Patients with uncorrectable coagulopathy,
- liver cirrhosis,
- acute gastrointestinal bleeding,
- pregnancy,
- breast feeding,
- documented allergy to fluorescein,
- patients with lesions that were deemed unsuitable for endoscopic resection, and
- patients without documented conventional biopsy results.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Soonchunhyang University Seoul Hospital
Seoul, 140-743, South Korea
Related Publications (5)
Wallace M, Lauwers GY, Chen Y, Dekker E, Fockens P, Sharma P, Meining A. Miami classification for probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy. Endoscopy. 2011 Oct;43(10):882-91. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1256632. Epub 2011 Aug 4.
PMID: 21818734RESULTJeon SR, Cho WY, Jin SY, Cheon YK, Choi SR, Cho JY. Optical biopsies by confocal endomicroscopy prevent additive endoscopic biopsies before endoscopic submucosal dissection in gastric epithelial neoplasias: a prospective, comparative study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2011 Oct;74(4):772-80. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.05.005. Epub 2011 Jul 29.
PMID: 21802680RESULTShahid MW, Buchner AM, Raimondo M, Woodward TA, Krishna M, Wallace MB. Accuracy of real-time vs. blinded offline diagnosis of neoplastic colorectal polyps using probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy: a pilot study. Endoscopy. 2012 Apr;44(4):343-8. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1291589. Epub 2012 Mar 1.
PMID: 22382851RESULTWallace MB, Crook JE, Saunders M, Lovat L, Coron E, Waxman I, Sharma P, Hwang JH, Banks M, DePreville M, Galmiche JP, Konda V, Diehl NN, Wolfsen HC. Multicenter, randomized, controlled trial of confocal laser endomicroscopy assessment of residual metaplasia after mucosal ablation or resection of GI neoplasia in Barrett's esophagus. Gastrointest Endosc. 2012 Sep;76(3):539-47.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2012.05.004. Epub 2012 Jun 28.
PMID: 22749368RESULTKuiper T, Kiesslich R, Ponsioen C, Fockens P, Dekker E. The learning curve, accuracy, and interobserver agreement of endoscope-based confocal laser endomicroscopy for the differentiation of colorectal lesions. Gastrointest Endosc. 2012 Jun;75(6):1211-7. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2012.01.040. Epub 2012 Mar 28.
PMID: 22459661RESULT
Biospecimen
Endscopic resection specimens of gastric neoplasia. Speciments were obtained either by endoscopic mucosal resection or endoscopic submucosal dissection.
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- M.D.
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 6, 2012
First Posted
September 20, 2012
Study Start
February 1, 2012
Primary Completion
September 1, 2012
Last Updated
September 20, 2012
Record last verified: 2012-09