NCT01687881

Brief Summary

This study will highlight and validate chiropractic spinal manipulative therapy (CSMT) for cervicogenic headache (CEH). If the method proves to be effective, it will provide a new non-pharmacological treatment option for CEH. This is especially important since pharmacological management has minor effect in CEH, and alternative treatment options are warranted. The applied methodology of the study will aim towards the highest possible research standards. This international study is a collaboration between Akershus University Hospital, Innlandet Hospital and University of Oslo (UiO), Norway and Macquarie University, Australia. The multidisciplinary professional backgrounds are physiotherapy, chiropractic and medicine. By increasing the methodological quality of the investigators research to a very high level, the investigators see the method to work as a guide to increase the quality of chiropractic research in the future, as previous randomized clinical trials (RCTs) of CEH used methodology showing room for improvement. Study hypothesis: CSMT using the Gonstead method reduces days with CEH by at least 25% as compared to placebo (sham manipulation, i.e. broad non-specific contact, non-directional, low velocity and low amplitude) and no intervention (control group).

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
19

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Sep 2012

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

September 1, 2012

Completed
10 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

September 11, 2012

Completed
8 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

September 19, 2012

Completed
1.6 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

May 1, 2014

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

May 1, 2014

Completed
Last Updated

January 10, 2019

Status Verified

January 1, 2019

Enrollment Period

1.7 years

First QC Date

September 11, 2012

Last Update Submit

January 9, 2019

Conditions

Keywords

ChiropracticManipulative therapyCervicogenic headache

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Number of headache days

    1. 25% reduction in number of headache days between active treatment and sham. 2. 25% reduction in number of headache days between active treatment and control group.

    Change from baseline to post-treatment, 3, 6, 12 months follow-up

Secondary Outcomes (4)

  • Headache duration

    Change from baseline to post-treatment, 3, 6, 12 months follow-up

  • Self reported VAS

    Change from baseline to post-treatment, 3, 6, 12 months follow-up

  • Headache index

    Change from baseline to post-treatment, 3, 6, 12 months follow-up

  • Headache medication

    Change from baseline to post-treatment, 3, 6, 12 months follow-up

Other Outcomes (1)

  • Sub-analysis on x-ray findings

    Change formbaseline to post-treatment, 3, 6, 12 months follow-up

Study Arms (3)

Sham Chiropractic

SHAM COMPARATOR

Sham Chiropractic manipulative therapy.

Other: Sham Chiropractic

Control group

NO INTERVENTION

No intervention: Control group.

Chiropractic Spinal Manipulative Therapy

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Active intervention: Chiropractic Spinal Manipulative Therapy

Other: Chiropractic

Interventions

Chiropractic Spinal Manipulative Therapy

Chiropractic Spinal Manipulative Therapy

Sham manipulation

Sham Chiropractic

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 70 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • CEH according to at least three major criteria of the CHISG not including occipital nerve blockage
  • Age 18-70 years

You may not qualify if:

  • Contraindication to spinal manipulation
  • Chiropractic treatment within the last 12 months
  • Radiculopathy
  • Depression
  • Pregnancy
  • Participants whom become pregnant during the migraine trial will also be excluded from analysis from the time of pregnancy
  • Participants who change their prophylactic medical regime for headaches will be excluded in the analysis from the time of change

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Research Centre, Akershus University Hospital

Lørenskog, 1478, Norway

Location

Related Publications (3)

  • Chaibi A, Russell MB. Manual therapies for cervicogenic headache: a systematic review. J Headache Pain. 2012 Jul;13(5):351-9. doi: 10.1007/s10194-012-0436-7. Epub 2012 Mar 30.

    PMID: 22460941BACKGROUND
  • Chaibi A, Benth JS, Tuchin PJ, Russell MB. Chiropractic spinal manipulative therapy for cervicogenic headache: a study protocol of a single-blinded placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial. Springerplus. 2015 Dec 16;4:779. doi: 10.1186/s40064-015-1567-5. eCollection 2015.

    PMID: 26697289BACKGROUND
  • Chaibi A, Knackstedt H, Tuchin PJ, Russell MB. Chiropractic spinal manipulative therapy for cervicogenic headache: a single-blinded, placebo, randomized controlled trial. BMC Res Notes. 2017 Jul 24;10(1):310. doi: 10.1186/s13104-017-2651-4.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Post-Traumatic Headache

Interventions

Manipulation, Chiropractic

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Headache Disorders, SecondaryHeadache DisordersBrain DiseasesCentral Nervous System DiseasesNervous System Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Musculoskeletal ManipulationsComplementary TherapiesTherapeutics

Study Officials

  • Michael B Russell, Professor

    Head and Neck research Group, Research Centre, Akershus University Hospital

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
PhD student

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

September 11, 2012

First Posted

September 19, 2012

Study Start

September 1, 2012

Primary Completion

May 1, 2014

Study Completion

May 1, 2014

Last Updated

January 10, 2019

Record last verified: 2019-01

Locations