Is Chiropractic Spinal Manipulative Therapy an Efficient Treatment Option in Cervicogenic Headache
2 other identifiers
interventional
19
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study will highlight and validate chiropractic spinal manipulative therapy (CSMT) for cervicogenic headache (CEH). If the method proves to be effective, it will provide a new non-pharmacological treatment option for CEH. This is especially important since pharmacological management has minor effect in CEH, and alternative treatment options are warranted. The applied methodology of the study will aim towards the highest possible research standards. This international study is a collaboration between Akershus University Hospital, Innlandet Hospital and University of Oslo (UiO), Norway and Macquarie University, Australia. The multidisciplinary professional backgrounds are physiotherapy, chiropractic and medicine. By increasing the methodological quality of the investigators research to a very high level, the investigators see the method to work as a guide to increase the quality of chiropractic research in the future, as previous randomized clinical trials (RCTs) of CEH used methodology showing room for improvement. Study hypothesis: CSMT using the Gonstead method reduces days with CEH by at least 25% as compared to placebo (sham manipulation, i.e. broad non-specific contact, non-directional, low velocity and low amplitude) and no intervention (control group).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Sep 2012
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2012
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 11, 2012
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 19, 2012
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 1, 2014
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 1, 2014
CompletedJanuary 10, 2019
January 1, 2019
1.7 years
September 11, 2012
January 9, 2019
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Number of headache days
1. 25% reduction in number of headache days between active treatment and sham. 2. 25% reduction in number of headache days between active treatment and control group.
Change from baseline to post-treatment, 3, 6, 12 months follow-up
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Headache duration
Change from baseline to post-treatment, 3, 6, 12 months follow-up
Self reported VAS
Change from baseline to post-treatment, 3, 6, 12 months follow-up
Headache index
Change from baseline to post-treatment, 3, 6, 12 months follow-up
Headache medication
Change from baseline to post-treatment, 3, 6, 12 months follow-up
Other Outcomes (1)
Sub-analysis on x-ray findings
Change formbaseline to post-treatment, 3, 6, 12 months follow-up
Study Arms (3)
Sham Chiropractic
SHAM COMPARATORSham Chiropractic manipulative therapy.
Control group
NO INTERVENTIONNo intervention: Control group.
Chiropractic Spinal Manipulative Therapy
ACTIVE COMPARATORActive intervention: Chiropractic Spinal Manipulative Therapy
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- CEH according to at least three major criteria of the CHISG not including occipital nerve blockage
- Age 18-70 years
You may not qualify if:
- Contraindication to spinal manipulation
- Chiropractic treatment within the last 12 months
- Radiculopathy
- Depression
- Pregnancy
- Participants whom become pregnant during the migraine trial will also be excluded from analysis from the time of pregnancy
- Participants who change their prophylactic medical regime for headaches will be excluded in the analysis from the time of change
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Research Centre, Akershus University Hospital
Lørenskog, 1478, Norway
Related Publications (3)
Chaibi A, Russell MB. Manual therapies for cervicogenic headache: a systematic review. J Headache Pain. 2012 Jul;13(5):351-9. doi: 10.1007/s10194-012-0436-7. Epub 2012 Mar 30.
PMID: 22460941BACKGROUNDChaibi A, Benth JS, Tuchin PJ, Russell MB. Chiropractic spinal manipulative therapy for cervicogenic headache: a study protocol of a single-blinded placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial. Springerplus. 2015 Dec 16;4:779. doi: 10.1186/s40064-015-1567-5. eCollection 2015.
PMID: 26697289BACKGROUNDChaibi A, Knackstedt H, Tuchin PJ, Russell MB. Chiropractic spinal manipulative therapy for cervicogenic headache: a single-blinded, placebo, randomized controlled trial. BMC Res Notes. 2017 Jul 24;10(1):310. doi: 10.1186/s13104-017-2651-4.
PMID: 28738895RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Michael B Russell, Professor
Head and Neck research Group, Research Centre, Akershus University Hospital
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- PhD student
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 11, 2012
First Posted
September 19, 2012
Study Start
September 1, 2012
Primary Completion
May 1, 2014
Study Completion
May 1, 2014
Last Updated
January 10, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-01