Effects of Two Doses of a Common Cold Treatment on Alertness
1 other identifier
interventional
240
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study will investigate any improvement in alertness and performance based on cognitive function and mood assessment in subjects suffering the common cold, when taking a novel paracetamol and caffeine combination verses paracetamol alone.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_3
Started Nov 2011
Shorter than P25 for phase_3
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
November 1, 2011
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 13, 2012
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 18, 2012
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 1, 2012
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 1, 2012
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
July 14, 2014
CompletedDecember 8, 2014
July 1, 2014
1 year
September 13, 2012
August 29, 2013
November 20, 2014
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change From Baseline in Number of Accurate Responses to Rapid Visual Information Processing (RVIP) Cognitive Test
The RVIP assessed the performance of visual attention mechanisms in remaining vigilant to periodically occurring events. The number of accurate responses to RVIP task was determined from the cognitive function computerised output. Participants monitored a series of single numbers (0-9) appearing in the centre of the screen. During the RVIP task, participants responded to consecutive sequences of three odd or three even numbers by pressing the corresponding response button as quickly and accurately as possible. This was identified in the output file by a value of '1' in 'TARGET=1' column. Also, the response time (in seconds) was recorded in the 'RT' column. If the subject correctly responded to the target, this was identified by a value of '1' in the 'CORRECT=1' column. The number of accurate responses was calculated as the total number of records where 'CORRECT=1' had a value of '1'. The test lasted approximately 9 minutes and number of accurate responses to stimulus was calculated.
Baseline to 60 minutes post treatment administration
Secondary Outcomes (9)
Change From Baseline in Number of Accurate Responses to RVIP Cognitive Test
Baseline to 120 minutes post treatment administration
Change From Baseline in Mean Time of Accurate Responses to RVIP Cognitive Task
Baseline, 60 minutes and upto 120 minutes post treatment administration
Change From Baseline in Number of Inaccurate and Missed Responses to RVIP Cognitive Task
Baseline, 60 minutes and up to 120 minutes post treatment administration
Change From Baseline in Number of Accurate Responses to Sustained Attention Tasks (SAT) Cognitive Test
Baseline, 60 minutes and up to 120 minutes post treatment administration
Change From Baseline in Mean Time of Accurate Responses to SAT Cognitive Task
Baseline, 30 minutes and up to 60 minutes post treatment administration
- +4 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (4)
highest dose Paracetamol + caffeine
ACTIVE COMPARATORhighest dose of Paracetamol and caffeine
low-dose Paracetamol + caffeine
ACTIVE COMPARATORlowest dose of Paracetamol and caffeine
high dose paracetamol
ACTIVE COMPARATORhighest dose paracetamol
low dose paracetamol
ACTIVE COMPARATORlowest dose paracetamol
Interventions
paracetamol with caffeine
Eligibility Criteria
Contact the study team to discuss eligibility requirements. They can help determine if this study is right for you.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- GlaxoSmithKlinelead
Study Sites (1)
Common Cold Centre
Cardiff, Wales, United Kingdom
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- GSK Response Center
- Organization
- GlaxoSmithKline
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
GSK Clinical Trials
GlaxoSmithKline
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 13, 2012
First Posted
September 18, 2012
Study Start
November 1, 2011
Primary Completion
November 1, 2012
Study Completion
November 1, 2012
Last Updated
December 8, 2014
Results First Posted
July 14, 2014
Record last verified: 2014-07