Clinical and Cost Effectiveness of Positive Behaviour Support: a Trial
PBS
1 other identifier
interventional
246
1 country
3
Brief Summary
Many people with intellectual disability have challenging behaviour which often has serious consequences such as the prescription of long term medication, in-patient admissions and disruption of normal daily activities. Community intellectual disability services may have difficulties in helping people with challenging behavior. Available research suggests that Positive Behavior Support (PBS), a training system that teaches staff how to manage these situations, can benefit service users who may show improvements in challenging behavior and quality of life. The investigators do not know of any study so far that has examined the clinical and cost effectiveness of PBS that is provided by staff in routine clinical practice in community intellectual disability services. If PBS proved to be better than treatment as usual, it would have important implications for the management of a very vulnerable group of service users. In this trial, health staff will receive accredited training in PBS available in a manual written by PBS experts. It will give details of how to understand challenging behavior and develop a management plan and how to implement it and monitor whether it has achieved its goals. Twenty community intellectual disability services and 260 service users with mild to severe intellectual disability and challenging behavior will be invited to take part in the study. The sample size calculations are based on our pilot study and allow for non participation of 10% and inflation due to the number of community intellectual disability teams and staff that will take part. The teams will be randomly allocated into one of two conditions. Half will be in the PBS arm (but will also have treatment as usual) and half will be in the treatment as usual only group. The investigators will carry out assessments of challenging behavior, use of services, quality of life, mental health, aggression and family and paid carer burden at six and 12 months. The investigators will monitor treatment fidelity and the investigators will talk to a sample of paid and family carers, service users, staff and managers about what they think of the treatment and how best the investigators can deliver it in routine care. The main outcome is reduction in challenging behavior at one year after the randomization. The investigators will also carry out a health economic evaluation to examine the costs and consequences of staff training in PBS.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_3
Started Nov 2012
Typical duration for phase_3
3 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 28, 2012
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 7, 2012
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
November 1, 2012
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 1, 2015
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 1, 2016
CompletedMay 23, 2016
June 1, 2015
3 years
August 28, 2012
May 20, 2016
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Challenging Behaviour
Reduction in challenging behaviour as measured by the Aberrant Behaviour Checklist (ABC)and change from baseline and 6 months
12 months
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Quality of life
12 months
Mental health status
12 months
Family carer burden
12 months
Paid carer burden
12 months
Family Carer Psychiatric Morbidity
12 months
Other Outcomes (3)
Cost effectiveness
12 months
Community participation
6 months
Community participation
12 months
Study Arms (2)
PBS based staff training
EXPERIMENTALThe training, which will be supported by a treatment manual will comprise the following sections: 1. Functional Behavioural Assessment and formulation skills • Brief Behavioural Assessment Tool for brief functional analyses 2. Primary Prevention 3. Secondary Prevention and Reactive Strategies 4. Periodic Service Review and Problem Solving * Developing individualised periodic service reviews * Trouble shooting
Treatment as usual
OTHERMost community intellectual disability services provide a range of health interventions that include but are not limited to psychiatric assessment and management, nursing support, psychology, speech and language therapy, occupational therapy and counselling. There may be some variation in resources but service users with challenging behaviour are likely to receive a range of broadly defined behavioural management and pharmacological interventions. Staff is routinely supervised by their clinical managers weekly.
Interventions
Please see published study protocol for more information: http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-244X/14/219
http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-244X/14/219
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Service users: Eligible to receive care from intellectual disability services; mild to severe intellectual disability; aged 18 years and over; total ABC score of at least 15 (indicates a degree of challenging behaviour occurring at least weekly including verbal or physical aggression, hyperactivity, refusal to attend activities, non responsiveness that requires professional input).
- Service: Willing to participate; availability of at least two staff members willing to train; written agreement by the service manager to participate.
You may not qualify if:
- Service users: primary clinical diagnosis of personality disorder or substance misuse; relapse in pre-existing mental disorder; decision by clinical team that a referral to the study would be inappropriate, e.g. there is an open complaint investigation
- Service: there are no team members willing to train; the service has already received and implements accredited PBS for their service users.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (3)
Leicestershire Foundation Trust
Leicester, United Kingdom
Camden & Islington Foundation Trust
London, United Kingdom
South London and St George's Mental Health Trust
London, United Kingdom
Related Publications (5)
Hassiotis A, Strydom A, Crawford M, Hall I, Omar R, Vickerstaff V, Hunter R, Crabtree J, Cooper V, Biswas A, Howie W, King M. Clinical and cost effectiveness of staff training in Positive Behaviour Support (PBS) for treating challenging behaviour in adults with intellectual disability: a cluster randomised controlled trial. BMC Psychiatry. 2014 Aug 3;14:219. doi: 10.1186/s12888-014-0219-6.
PMID: 25927187BACKGROUNDStrydom A, Bosco A, Vickerstaff V, Hunter R; PBS study group; Hassiotis A. Clinical and cost effectiveness of staff training in the delivery of Positive Behaviour Support (PBS) for adults with intellectual disabilities, autism spectrum disorder and challenging behaviour - randomised trial. BMC Psychiatry. 2020 Apr 15;20(1):161. doi: 10.1186/s12888-020-02577-1.
PMID: 32293383DERIVEDHunter RM, Vickerstaff V, Poppe M, Strydom A, King M, Hall I, Crabtree J, Omar R, Cooper V, Biswas A, Hassiotis A. Staff training in positive behaviour support for behaviour that challenges in people with intellectual disability: cost-utility analysis of a cluster randomised controlled trial. BJPsych Open. 2020 Feb 5;6(2):e15. doi: 10.1192/bjo.2020.1.
PMID: 32019635DERIVEDHassiotis A, Poppe M, Strydom A, Vickerstaff V, Hall I, Crabtree J, Omar R, King M, Hunter R, Bosco A, Biswas A, Ratti V, Blickwedel J, Cooper V, Howie W, Crawford M. Positive behaviour support training for staff for treating challenging behaviour in people with intellectual disabilities: a cluster RCT. Health Technol Assess. 2018 Mar;22(15):1-110. doi: 10.3310/hta22150.
PMID: 29596045DERIVEDHassiotis A, Poppe M, Strydom A, Vickerstaff V, Hall IS, Crabtree J, Omar RZ, King M, Hunter R, Biswas A, Cooper V, Howie W, Crawford MJ. Clinical outcomes of staff training in positive behaviour support to reduce challenging behaviour in adults with intellectual disability: cluster randomised controlled trial. Br J Psychiatry. 2018 Mar;212(3):161-168. doi: 10.1192/bjp.2017.34. Epub 2018 Feb 12.
PMID: 29436314DERIVED
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Andre Strydom, MD PhD
UCL
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Ian Hall, MBBS MPhil
East London Foundation Trust
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Michael King, FRCGP PhD
UCL
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Rumana Omar
UCL Statistics
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Rachael Hunter
Health Economist
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Vivien Cooper
Challenging Behaviour Foundation
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 28, 2012
First Posted
September 7, 2012
Study Start
November 1, 2012
Primary Completion
November 1, 2015
Study Completion
November 1, 2016
Last Updated
May 23, 2016
Record last verified: 2015-06