Robot Walking Rehabilitation in Stroke Patients
RoboSTROKE
Effect of Robot Assisted Treatment on Gait Performace in Stroke Patients
1 other identifier
interventional
28
1 country
2
Brief Summary
Stroke are the main causes of motor disability among adults and are expected to impose an increasing social and economic burden for our Country. The impact of stroke on patients is enormous, with negative ramifications on the persons participation in social, vocational, and recreational activities. It is the primary cause of long-term disability in these countries. At the present stage, it is well known that control of balance during upright standing depends upon the central integration of afferent information from vestibular, somatosensory (proprioceptive, tactile), and visual systems, which constitute a multilink neural network for the control of neck, hip, and ankle joints. More recently, it has been studied at the level of cerebral cortex; vestibular inputs would reach face/neck representation of primary somatosensory cortex and would be then integrated with visual and somatosensory inputs in intraparietal, posterior end of the insula and medial superior temporal cortices. Remarkably, balance impairment and the associated risk of falling represent one of the most prominent and potentially disabling features in stroke subjects. The specific aims of this project are: to verify whether the robotics lower limb treatment with body weight support is more effective than the treadmill treatment in the reduction of motor impairment in Stroke patients, and to improve the quality of the gait and the endurance and to analyze possible improvements in terms of physiological biomechanical gait through analysis of spatio-temporal parameters.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable stroke
Started Sep 2012
Typical duration for not_applicable stroke
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 31, 2012
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2012
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 5, 2012
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 1, 2014
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 1, 2015
CompletedApril 10, 2024
April 1, 2024
1.9 years
August 31, 2012
April 9, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
6 minuts walking test.
The 6 minuts walking test as primary outcome assessments will be collected at baseline (inclusion)(T0) and endpoint (after 15 robot sesion) (T1) (no later than 1 day \> last training session) at the follow-up examination after 3/6 months from the treatments conclusion (T2).
Change from Baseline in gait speed at 6 months follow up.
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Fugl Meyer (lower limb section)
Change from Baseline in Fugl Meyer scrores at 6 months follow up months follow up.
Borg scale
Change from Baseline in Borg scale at 6 months follow up.
Gait Parameters with EMG
baseline, weekly during intervention, 6 months follow up
Functional Ambulation Classification
Change from Baseline in Fugl Meyer scrores at 6 months follow up months follow up.
Walk Handicap Scale (WHS)
Change from Baseline in Fugl Meyer scrores at 6 months follow up months follow up.
Study Arms (3)
Robot G-EO
EXPERIMENTALEach subject will be asked to perform 15 sessions (3 to 5 days a week for 4 up to 5 weeks) consisting of a treatment cycle using the GE-O system device, according to individually tailored exercise scheduling.
Treadmill Training
ACTIVE COMPARATOREach subject will be asked to perform 15 sessions (3 to 5 days a week for 4 up to 5 weeks) consisting of a treatment cycle using the treadmill system device, according to individually tailored exercise scheduling.
Ground treatment
ACTIVE COMPARATORGround Control Group (cCG): Each subject will be asked to perform 15 sessions (3 to 5 days a week for 4 up to 5 weeks) of traditional lower limb physiotherapy treatment.
Interventions
The practice will included an add-on robot-assisted walking therapy at variable speeds for 40 min with a partial body weight support (BWS). All participants will start with 30-40% BWS and an initial treadmill speed of 1.5 km/h speed will be increased to a range of 2.2 to 2.5 km/h and the BWS % will be decreased.
The practice will included an add-on treadmill walking therapy at variable speeds for 40 min with a partial body weight support (BWS). All participants will start with 30-40% BWS and an initial comfortable treadmill speed and the speed will be increased to a range of 1,0 to 2.5 km/h and the BWS % will be decreased.
The practice will included ground walking therapy s for 40 min with therapist support.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- between the ages of 18-95 years;
- able to walk 25 feet unassisted or with assistance
- truck control
- first acute event of cerebrovascular stroke
- unilateral paresis,
- ability to understand and follow simple instructions
- ability to walk without assistance prior to stroke
- endurance sufficient to stand at least 20 minutes unassisted per patient report.
You may not qualify if:
- unable to understand instructions required by the study (Informed Consent Test of Comprehension).
- medical or neurological comorbidities that might contribute to significant gait dysfunction.
- uncontrolled hypertension \> 190/110 mmHg.
- significant symptoms of orthostasis when standing up.
- circulatory problems, history of vascular claudication or significant (+3) pitting edema.
- lower extremity injuries or joint problems (hip or leg) that limit range of motion or function, or cause pain with movement
- bilateral impairment,
- severe sensory deficits in the paretic upper limb,
- cognitive impairment or behavioral dysfunction that would influence the ability to comprehend or participate in the study.
- Women who are pregnant and/or lactating.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (2)
San Raffaele Cassino
Cassino, Italy
IRCCS San Raffaele Roma
Rome, 00166, Italy
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Michela Goffredo, BME
IRCCS San Raffaele Rome Italy
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 31, 2012
First Posted
September 5, 2012
Study Start
September 1, 2012
Primary Completion
August 1, 2014
Study Completion
September 1, 2015
Last Updated
April 10, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-04