Evaluation of EUS-Guided 22 Gauge Core Biopsy Versus Fine-needle Aspiration for Suspected Pancreatic Neoplasms
Prospective Paired Evaluation of EUS-Guided 22 Gauge Core Biopsy Versus Fine-needle Aspiration for Suspected Pancreatic Neoplasms
1 other identifier
interventional
40
1 country
1
Brief Summary
We aim to compare the efficacy (diagnostic yield), ease of use, and technical success rates of EUS guided 22 gauge fine needle aspiration to core biopsy in the evaluation of pancreatic tumors. The experimental hypothesis is that FNA will have superior overall diagnostic yield than core biopsy.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_4
Started Sep 2011
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2011
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 22, 2012
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 27, 2012
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 9, 2013
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 9, 2013
CompletedFebruary 22, 2024
February 1, 2024
1.9 years
August 22, 2012
February 20, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Diagnostic Yield
One-week post procedure
Study Arms (1)
Fine Needle Aspiration and Core Biospsy
EXPERIMENTALPatients will undergo both FNA and core biopsy during EUS evaluation of a solid pancreatic tumor.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age greater than 18 and less than 90 years.
- Presence of a solid (greater than 60%) mass lesion within the pancreas on cross-sectional imaging, without a preceding tissue diagnosis.
- Absence of an uncorrectable coagulopathy as defined by abnormal prothrombin time (PT) or partial thromboplastin time (PTT) that does not correct with the administration of fresh frozen plasma.
- The patient must read and speak english and has signed informed consent document.
- The patient is scheduled for diagnostic endosonography by their referring provider or UVa gastroenterologist.
You may not qualify if:
- Age less than 18 or greater than 90 years.
- The patient is unable to read or understand the consent form.
- The patient is currently pregnant.
- The patient has an uncorrectable coagulopathy as defined by a prolonged prothrombin time (PT) or partial thromboplastin time (PTT) which does not improve with administration of fresh frozen plasma.
- The patient has a pancreatic mass lesion which is predominantly cystic (greater than 40%).
- No mass lesion is identified at the time of endosonography.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University of Virginia
Charlottesville, Virginia, 22908, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Vanessa Shami, MD
University of Virginia
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 22, 2012
First Posted
August 27, 2012
Study Start
September 1, 2011
Primary Completion
July 9, 2013
Study Completion
July 9, 2013
Last Updated
February 22, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-02