NCT01673048

Brief Summary

Elastic stable intramedullary nailing (ESIN) is the standard treatment for displaced diaphyseal femoral fractures in children. However, some literature report high complication rates (10-50%) in complex fractures. Data of our own patients with special emphasis on complications showed also mediocre results. Thus, a biomechanical study was conducted to search for modifications. In this study the stiffness with a 3rd nail implanted was compared to the classical 2 C-shaped configuration. For each of the 3 configurations of retrograde ESIN (titanium nails) eight composite femoral grafts (Sawbones®) with an identical spiral fracture were used: 2C configuration (2 C-shaped nails, 2x3.5 mm), 3CM configuration (3rd from antero-medial, + 1x2.5 mm) and 3CL configuration (3rd from antero-lateral, + 1x2.5 mm). Each group underwent biomechanical testing in 4-point bending, IRO/ERO and axial compression (0°/9°). Due to a significantly higher stiffness of 3CL in the anterior-posterior, internal rotation and 9° compression directions implantation of 3 nails became standard treatment for all dislocated femoral fractures at our department. All patients were followed prospectively. The following data was collected: Type of osteosynthesis, any kind of complication (additional procedures like cast or external fixateur, Re-Do operations, misalignment, pseudarthrosis, skin irritation, infection), time until full weight bearing and time until implant removal. At follow-up the legs were controlled for a possible length discrepancy and a possible deviation of axis. Patients' satisfaction was controlled by CSQ (clients satisfaction score, Larsen et al 2002). Further on the Harris Hip Score was used. X-ray controls were done as standard care protocol after 1 and 3-4 months (dependend on age). Level of Evidence IV Keywords: Elastic stable intramedullary nailing, biomechanical testing, fracture, femur, treatment, children, adolescents.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
18

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jan 2009

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 1, 2009

Completed
3.6 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

August 12, 2012

Completed
15 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

August 27, 2012

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

October 1, 2012

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 1, 2012

Completed
Last Updated

February 14, 2014

Status Verified

February 1, 2014

Enrollment Period

3.8 years

First QC Date

August 12, 2012

Last Update Submit

February 13, 2014

Conditions

Keywords

Elastic stable intramedullary nailingbiomechanical testingfracturefemurtreatmentchildrenadolescents

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Intraoperative and postoperative complications

    All complications will be recorded: Intraoperative and postoperative complications, Re-Do operations

    12 months

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • misalignment

    12 m

  • Pseudarthrosis

    12 m

Other Outcomes (1)

  • Limb discrepancy

    12 m

Study Arms (1)

Femoral fracture, ESIN

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Prospectively all patients treated with the 3-nail-configuration for dislocated femoral shaft fractures were enrolled; 25 patients are planned, 18 could be enrolled Comparison will be with own previous data of patients treated with the "classical" 2-C-shaped ESIN-osteosynthesis

Procedure: 3-Nail-ESIN in femoral shaft fractures

Interventions

Femoral fracture, ESIN

Eligibility Criteria

Age3 Years - 17 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17)

You may qualify if:

  • Dislocated femoral fracture
  • ESIN osteosynthesis

You may not qualify if:

  • No given informed consent
  • Other osteosynthesis than ESIN

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Department of Pediatric Surgery

Lübeck, 23538, Germany

Location

Related Publications (4)

  • Kaiser MM, Zachert G, Wendlandt R, Eggert R, Stratmann C, Gros N, Schulze-Hessing M, Rapp M. Increasing stability by pre-bending the nails in elastic stable intramedullary nailing: a biomechanical analysis of a synthetic femoral spiral fracture model. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2012 May;94(5):713-8. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.94B5.28247.

    PMID: 22529097BACKGROUND
  • Kaiser MM, Zachert G, Wendlandt R, Rapp M, Eggert R, Stratmann C, Wessel LM, Schulz AP, Kienast BJ. Biomechanical analysis of a synthetic femoral spiral fracture model: Do end caps improve retrograde flexible intramedullary nail fixation? J Orthop Surg Res. 2011 Sep 18;6:46. doi: 10.1186/1749-799X-6-46.

    PMID: 21923948BACKGROUND
  • Kaiser MM, Wessel LM, Zachert G, Stratmann C, Eggert R, Gros N, Schulze-Hessing M, Kienast B, Rapp M. Biomechanical analysis of a synthetic femur spiral fracture model: Influence of different materials on the stiffness in flexible intramedullary nailing. Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2011 Jul;26(6):592-7. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2011.01.012. Epub 2011 Feb 22.

    PMID: 21345557BACKGROUND
  • Kaiser MM, Stratmann C, Zachert G, Schulze-Hessing M, Gros N, Eggert R, Rapp M. Modification of elastic stable intramedullary nailing with a 3rd nail in a femoral spiral fracture model - results of biomechanical testing and a prospective clinical study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2014 Jan 8;15:3. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-15-3.

Related Links

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Femoral FracturesFractures, Bone

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Wounds and InjuriesLeg Injuries

Study Officials

  • Martin M Kaiser, PD Dr. med.

    University Luebeck

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Consultant

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

August 12, 2012

First Posted

August 27, 2012

Study Start

January 1, 2009

Primary Completion

October 1, 2012

Study Completion

December 1, 2012

Last Updated

February 14, 2014

Record last verified: 2014-02

Locations