Comparison of Wound Bed Establishment in Facial Burns
1 other identifier
interventional
10
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Forty percent of patients admitted to the contributing regional burn unit over a five month period received facial burns (n=14). The purpose of this study is to examine if the time until a granulation bed is well established can be decreased be using an enzymatic agent, when compared to a second standard ointment, for patients with partial-thickness facial burns. The current study will use a prospective, experimental study design in which each individual will be their own matched control. That is, each individual will receive both the experimental ointment (one-side of the face) and the standard ointment (other-side of the face). Outcomes measured will be the benefits (e.g., decreased in the time until granulation bed establishment) one ointment achieves in partial-thickness facial burns when compared to a second ointment. Exploratory analyses will examine the relationships among demographic variables, granulation bed establishment time, pain, anxiety, itching, and scarring. That is, testing whether the time until granulation establishment may be associated with an individual's demographic variables, treatment type, pain, anxiety, itching levels, and scarring. Significance for all analysis will be at the 0.05 level. The investigators hypothesize that promoting rapid granulation bed establishment will decrease hospital length of stays, costs, risk of infection, and possibly associated appearance changes. The results from the current study will provide preliminary findings for a future, more sophisticated study.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_4
Started Feb 2012
Typical duration for phase_4
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
February 1, 2012
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 8, 2012
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 17, 2012
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 1, 2013
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 1, 2014
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
August 28, 2017
CompletedAugust 28, 2017
July 1, 2017
1.8 years
August 8, 2012
April 5, 2017
July 27, 2017
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Time to Wound Epithelialization
Time it required the subjects treated with two standard ointments to establish a wound bed.
Two years
Study Arms (2)
Bacitracin on left, Enzymatic agent on right
EXPERIMENTALSubjects were randomized to receive enzymatic agent on right side of face and bacitracin on left.
Bacitractin on right, enzymatic agent on left
EXPERIMENTALSubjects were randomized to receive enzymatic agent on left side of face and bacitracin on right.
Interventions
Enzymatic agent
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- patients (over the age of 18 years) admitted to the burn unit with a minimum of 1% partial-thickness burns each side of the face.
You may not qualify if:
- patients with superficial or full-thickness facial burns;
- patients receiving facial grafts; patients with burns from chemical or contact sources;
- patients with wound infection;
- any patients starting treatment 24 hours after burn injury;
- patients with known sensitivity to either standard treatment; and
- any women by history who are pregnant or breast feeding.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University of Louisvillelead
- Healthpointcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
UofL Health Care
Louisville, Kentucky, 40202, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
Small sample size. The study did not differentiate between deep partial thickness and superficial partial thickness burns. another way to trial this study methodology would be to use animal subjects.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr. Carlee Lehna, Associate Professor
- Organization
- University of Louisville School of Nursing
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Carlee R. Lehna, PhD, APRN-BC
University of Louisville, School of Nursing
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Participants received both the test drug and the standard of care, one on each side of the face.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SEQUENTIAL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 8, 2012
First Posted
August 17, 2012
Study Start
February 1, 2012
Primary Completion
November 1, 2013
Study Completion
August 1, 2014
Last Updated
August 28, 2017
Results First Posted
August 28, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-07