Micro-laparoscopy and Single-port Hysterectomy
MLPS/LESS
Micro-laparoscopic Versus Single-port Total Hysterectomy: a Randomized Trial.
1 other identifier
interventional
71
1 country
1
Brief Summary
A total of 86 patients underwent total hysterectomy. Three of them refused randomization, 34 were randomly assigned to undergo to laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) and 34 to undergo micro-laparoscopy (M-LPS).Laparoscopic hysterectomy can be safely performed by M-LPS and LESS.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started May 2011
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2011
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 1, 2012
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 1, 2012
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 11, 2012
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 16, 2012
CompletedAugust 16, 2012
August 1, 2012
9 months
May 11, 2012
August 14, 2012
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Post-operative pain
within 8 hours after surgery
Study Arms (2)
micro-laparoscopy
ACTIVE COMPARATORM-LPS hysterectomy was performed through one optical trans-umbilical 5 mm trocar and three 3 mm sovra-pubic ancillary ports. A 5 mm 0° endoscope and 3 mm laparoscopic instruments were utilized, choosing among graspers, cold scissors, suction/irrigation and bipolar coagulator.
laparoendoscopic single site surgery
ACTIVE COMPARATORLESS hysterectomy was performed through a multi-channel single trocar inserted in the umbilicus using an open technique (1.5-2 cm cutaneous incision), as previously reported. Intra-abdominal visualization was obtained with a 0° 5-mm telescope with a flexible tip.Working straight 5-mm instruments were inserted into the remaining 2 ports, choosing among graspers, cold scissors, suction/irrigation bipolar coagulator and a multifunctional versatile laparoscopic device, which grasps, coagulates and transects simultaneously. In order to prevent clashing between instruments and surgeon's hands and to facilitate surgical manoeuvres, the combination of one 33 cm-long instrument with a 43 cm-long instrument was adopted. The umbilical fascia was closed with a figure-of-eight 0-Vicryl.
Interventions
M-LPS hysterectomy was performed through one optical trans-umbilical 5 mm trocar and three 3 mm sovra-pubic ancillary ports. A 5 mm 0° endoscope and 3 mm laparoscopic instruments were utilized, choosing among graspers, cold scissors, suction/irrigation and bipolar coagulator.
LESS hysterectomy was performed through a multi-channel single trocar inserted in the umbilicus using an open technique (1.5-2 cm cutaneous incision), as previously reported. Intra-abdominal visualization was obtained with a 0° 5-mm telescope with a flexible tip. Working straight 5-mm instruments were inserted into the remaining 2 ports, choosing among graspers, cold scissors, suction/irrigation bipolar coagulator and a multifunctional versatile laparoscopic device, which grasps, coagulates and transects simultaneously. In order to prevent clashing between instruments and surgeon's hands and to facilitate surgical manoeuvres, the combination of one 33 cm-long instrument with a 43 cm-long instrument was adopted. The umbilical fascia was closed with a figure-of-eight 0-Vicryl.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- appropriate medical status for laparoscopic surgery;
- uterine size \< 12 weeks of pregnancy;
- no previous longitudinal major abdominal surgery.
You may not qualify if:
- pelvic organ prolapse greater than grade I
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Francesco Fanfani
Rome, Rome, 00168, Italy
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Francesco Fanfani, MD
Catholic University of the Sacred Heart
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Anna Fagotti, PhD
Catholic University of the Sacred Heart
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Maria L Gagliardi, MD
Catholic University of the Sacred Heart
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Giorgia Monterossi, MD
Catholic University of the Sacred Heart
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Cristiano Rossitto, MD
Catholic University of the Sacred Heart
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Barbara Costantini, MD
Catholic University of the Sacred Heart
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Salvatore Gueli Alletti, MD
Catholic University of the Sacred Heart
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Giovanni Scambia, MD
Catholic University of the Sacred Heart
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Clinical Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 11, 2012
First Posted
August 16, 2012
Study Start
May 1, 2011
Primary Completion
February 1, 2012
Study Completion
May 1, 2012
Last Updated
August 16, 2012
Record last verified: 2012-08