To Determine Optimal Time for Delivering Electrical Shocks to Cardiac Arrest Patients
A Multicenter Randomised Controlled Trial Comparing Shock Success With Synchronized Defibrillation (Compression Upstroke Versus Precompression) During Ongoing Mechanical Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation In The Emergency Department
1 other identifier
interventional
180
1 country
1
Brief Summary
In this study, we are comparing the difference in outcomes between patients who were given shocks to the heart, during the upstroke of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and before CPR is started. The study population will be all cardiac arrest patients attended by the staff of the Emergency Department who fulfil the eligibility criteria. Patients will be managed according to currently approved cardiac arrest protocols. Patients confirmed in cardiac arrest have manual chest compressions started while mechanical CPR (whereby chest compressions are delivered by an automated device) is prepared. Mechanical CPR should be started as soon as possible (\<1 minute). If patients are eligible to be shocked, they will receive shocks either during upstroke of CPR or before CPR is started. Thus the purpose of this study is to answer the question whether are there improvement in survival between when shocks are given during upstroke and before CPR is started.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Jan 2016
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 6, 2012
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 15, 2012
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 1, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 3, 2019
CompletedSeptember 20, 2019
September 1, 2019
2.2 years
August 6, 2012
September 18, 2019
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
successful electrical conversion (shock success)
Termination of Ventricular Fibrillation (VF) or pulseless Ventricular Tachycardia (VT) and the establishment of organized rhythm within 60 seconds. An organized rhythm requires at least 2 QRS complexes separated by no more than 5 seconds.
establishment of organized rhythm within 60 seconds
Secondary Outcomes (6)
termination of VF regardless of the resulting rhythm
at least 5 seconds after the shock
Return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC)
at least 20 minutes
Survival to hospital admission
at least 1 day
Survival to hospital discharge
at least 1 day
Functional survival outcomes assessed by the Glasgow Outcomes Score (CPC/OPC)
at least 1 day
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Precompression
EXPERIMENTALControl arm
Upstroke Compression
ACTIVE COMPARATORIntervention arm
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Cardiac Arrest patients who received eith CPR and/or defibrillation
- Ventricular Fibrillation or Pulseless Ventricular Tachycardia
You may not qualify if:
- Patients pronounced dead without attempting CPR according to standard operating procedure and ILCOR guidelines
- Cardiac arrest obviously caused by major trauma
- Children below age 21
- Patients who are pregnant
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Singapore General Hospitallead
- Zoll Medical Corporationcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Singapore General Hospital
Singapore, 169608, Singapore
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Marcus Eng Hock Ong, MBBS, FRCS
Singapore General Hospital
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 6, 2012
First Posted
August 15, 2012
Study Start
January 1, 2016
Primary Completion
March 1, 2018
Study Completion
April 3, 2019
Last Updated
September 20, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-09