Pain Control for Intrauterine Device Placement: A Trial of Ketorolac Prior to Intrauterine Device Placement
1 other identifier
interventional
67
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Intrauterine device (IUD) placement can be painful for patients during and after the procedure. Fear of pain from IUD insertion can be a barrier to obtaining this highly effective long acting reversible contraception. Currently there are no proven effective methods for reduction of pain during and after placement of modern IUDs (Mirena IUD and Paragard IUD). Ketorolac has not been studied in regards to decreasing pain during and after IUD insertion although it is used by some providers for this purpose. It is a strong NSAID that is indicated for the treatment of moderate acute pain. In the intramuscular form it has an analgesia onset of action at 30min, thus may be a plausible option for pain management in the office setting compared to oral NSAIDs, which have a longer time to onset of analgesia and have not been proven to be effective in reducing pain associated with IUD placement. The primary aim of this study is to determine whether ketorolac (Toradol) decreases pain associated with intrauterine device placement compared to placebo. We hypothesize that administration of ketorolac 30mg intramuscularly at least 30 minutes prior to IUD insertion will decrease pain scores by at least 20mm on a visual analog scale at various time points during IUD insertion when compared to placebo of normal saline injection.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jul 2012
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 28, 2012
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
July 1, 2012
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 14, 2012
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 1, 2014
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 1, 2014
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
December 23, 2015
CompletedDecember 23, 2015
November 1, 2015
1.7 years
June 28, 2012
July 22, 2015
November 18, 2015
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
VAS (Visual Analogue Scale) Measurement of Pain
The patient marked their pain on a 0 to 10cm visual analogue scale, where 0 cm is no pain and 10 cm is the worst pain ever.
Pain with IUD placement, measured immediately after placement
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Pain Scores at Other Time Points During and After IUD Placement
immediately after each step (see description)
Nulliparous Patients - Subgroup Analysis
immediately after each step (see description)
Post-insertion Patient Questionnaire
assessed at 15 minutes after IUD insertion
Post-insertion Provider Questionnaire
Immediately after IUD placement, on average within 1 hour
Study Arms (2)
Placebo with 1cc normal saline IM
PLACEBO COMPARATORIf the patient is randomized to the placebo arm, they will receive 1cc of normal saline via the intramuscular route.
Toradol, 30mg in 1cc IM
EXPERIMENTALIf the patient is randomized to the toradol (ketorolac) arm, they will receive 30mg of toradol in a 1cc volume via the intramuscular route.
Interventions
Ketorolac 30mg intramuscular injection, 1cc volume
Placebo arm, 1cc of normal saline, 0.9%, intramuscular injection
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Nulliparous and multiparous women ages 18-50, who are English or Spanish speaking, who present for intrauterine device placement for contraception or menorrhagia (in the case of Mirena IUD insertion).
You may not qualify if:
- Pregnancy
- Any diagnosed chronic pain issues (i.e. fibromyalgia, endometriosis, dysmenorrhea, irritable bowel syndrome, interstitial cystitis)
- If the patient has taken any pain medications within 6 hours of enrollment, including aspirin or other NSAIDs
- Misoprostol administration within 24 hours of enrollment
- History of prior IUD insertion
- Known allergy to NSAIDs including diagnosis of aspirin or NSAID induced asthma or urticaria
- Known contraindications to NSAIDs, such as the following medications that are risk category D (consider therapy modification) or X (avoid combination) including
- bile acid sequestrants (D - may decrease absorption of NSAIDs)
- cyclosporine (D - NSAIDs may enhance the nephrotoxic effects)
- drotrecogin alfa (D - NSAIDs may enhance the adverse/toxic effects, cause bleeding)
- floctafenine (X - may enhance adverse/toxic effect of NSAIDs)
- lithium (D - NSAIDs may decrease serum concentration)
- methotrexate (D - NSAIDs may decrease excretion)
- pentoxifylline (X - Ketorolac may enhance adverse/toxic effects)
- probenecid (X - may increase serum concentration of Ketorolac)
- +7 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Lynn Ngolead
Study Sites (1)
University of California San Diego
San Diego, California, 92103, United States
Related Publications (4)
Allen RH, Bartz D, Grimes DA, Hubacher D, O'Brien P. Interventions for pain with intrauterine device insertion. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Jul 8;(3):CD007373. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007373.pub2.
PMID: 19588429BACKGROUNDRoche NE, Li D, James D, Fechner A, Tilak V. The effect of perioperative ketorolac on pain control in pregnancy termination. Contraception. 2012 Mar;85(3):299-303. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2011.10.001. Epub 2011 Nov 30.
PMID: 22133656BACKGROUNDEdelman AB, Schaefer E, Olson A, Van Houten L, Bednarek P, Leclair C, Jensen JT. Effects of prophylactic misoprostol administration prior to intrauterine device insertion in nulliparous women. Contraception. 2011 Sep;84(3):234-9. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2011.01.016. Epub 2011 Mar 3.
PMID: 21843686BACKGROUNDNgo LL, Ward KK, Mody SK. Ketorolac for Pain Control With Intrauterine Device Placement: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Jul;126(1):29-36. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000912.
PMID: 26241253DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr. Lynn Ngo, Lead Study Coordinator/investigator
- Organization
- BWH
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Lynn L Ngo, MD
University of California, San Diego
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Sheila Mody, MD MPH
University of California, San Diego
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Resident Physician
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 28, 2012
First Posted
August 14, 2012
Study Start
July 1, 2012
Primary Completion
March 1, 2014
Study Completion
March 1, 2014
Last Updated
December 23, 2015
Results First Posted
December 23, 2015
Record last verified: 2015-11