Oleogel-S10 Versus Standard of Care in Healing of Grade 2a Burn Wounds
Open, Blindly Evaluated, Prospective, Controlled, Randomized, Multicenter Phase III Clinical Trial to Compare Intra-individually the Efficacy and Tolerance of Oleogel-S10 Versus Standard of Care in Accelerating the Healing of Grade 2a Partial-Thickness Burn Wounds
2 other identifiers
interventional
61
4 countries
9
Brief Summary
The main goal of this phase III clinical trial is to show safety and efficacy of Oleogel-S10 in the acceleration of wound healing of grade 2a burn wounds.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_3
Started Aug 2012
9 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 29, 2012
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
August 1, 2012
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 6, 2012
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 1, 2013
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 1, 2014
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
September 28, 2015
CompletedSeptember 28, 2015
August 1, 2015
11 months
July 29, 2012
July 31, 2015
August 28, 2015
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Percentage of Patients With Earlier Healing of the Wound Half Treated With Oleogel-S10 Compared to the Wound Half Receiving Standard of Care
Photo-based evaluation by independent experts blinded to the treatment regime.
2 to 3 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (10)
Intra-individual Difference in Time to Wound Closure Between Wound Halves, Either Treated With Oleogel-S10 or Treated With Standard of Care
2 to 3 weeks
Time From Study Start After Burn Accident Until Wound Closure is Achieved Separately for Wound Halves Treated With Oleogel-S10 vs. Standard of Care
2 to 3 weeks
Percentage of Patients With Wound Closure at Different Time Points
2 to 3 weeks
Percentage of Wound Epithelialization at Different Time Points as Assessed by the Investigator
2 to 3 weeks
Likert Scale Rating of Efficacy (Evaluated by Both the Investigators and Patients)
2 to 3 weeks
- +5 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Oleogel-S10 ointment
EXPERIMENTALIntra-individual comparison. Oleogel-S10 ointment is administered to one randomly assigned wound half.
Octenilin® wound gel
OTHERIntraindividual comparison: The other wound half receives disinfectant Octenilin® wound gel.
Interventions
Intraindividual comparison: One randomly assigned wound half is treated with Oleogel-S10 ointment and fatty gauze wound dressing
Intraindividual comparison: The other wound half is treated with Octenilin® wound gel and fatty gauze wound dressing
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients at least 18 years old who have provided written informed consent.
- Presenting with acute grade 2a burn wounds (as graded by an expert surgeon assisted by LDI or a multispectral imaging system) within 48 hours after injury.
- Burn wound caused by fire burn, heat burn or scalding.
- Burn patients with grade 2a burn wounds between 80 cm2 and less than 25% of their TBSA (alternatively, 2 comparable wounds with size more than 40 cm2 each and less than 12.5% of the TBSA each are allowed).
- Patient is able to understand the Informed Consent Form provided and is prepared to comply with all study requirements, including the following: Visiting the trial site for wound dressing changes at least every second day (if patient is not hospitalized) and photo documentation until full wound closure or until the Investigator decides to change medication and/or treatment after day 21 after start of treatment
- Willing to perform all necessary wound dressing changes at the trial site. Also the patient needs to agree to return to site for 3 and 12 months follow-up visits.
- Women of childbearing potential must apply highly effective method of birth control (failure rate less than 1% per year when used consistently and correctly (e.g., implants, injectables, combined oral contraceptives, some intrauterine contraceptive devices (IUDs), sexual abstinence, or a vasectomized partner))
You may not qualify if:
- Suffering from chemical burns, or electrical burns or sunburns
- Having already received treatment for their burn with silver sulfadiazine (obscures photographic wound evaluation).
- Positive blood culture after the burn.
- Diseases or conditions that could, in the opinion of the Investigator, interfere with the assessment of safety, tolerance or efficacy.
- A skin disorder that is chronic or currently active and which the Investigator considers will adversely affect the healing of the acute wounds or involves the areas to be examined in this trial.
- A history of clinically significant hypersensitivity to any of the drugs or surgical dressings to be used in this trial.
- Known multiple allergic disorders.
- Taking, or have taken, any investigational drugs within 3 months prior to the screening visit.
- Pregnant or breast feeding women are not allowed to participate in the study.
- Inappropriate to participate in the study, for any reason, in the opinion of the Investigator.
- Mental incapacity or language barriers precluding adequate understanding or co-operation or willingness to follow study procedures.
- Previous participation in this study.
- Employee at the investigational site, relative or spouse of the Investigator
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Birken AGlead
Study Sites (9)
Unfallkrankenhaus Berlin
Berlin, Germany
Berufsgenossenschaftliches Universitätsklinikum Bergmannsheil
Bochum, Germany
Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein
Lübeck, Germany
Linköping University Hospital
Linköping, Sweden
University Hospital
Uppsala, Sweden
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois
Lausanne, Switzerland
University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust
Birmingham, United Kingdom
Broomfield Hospital
Chelmsford, United Kingdom
Queen Victoria Hospital
East Grinstead, United Kingdom
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Head of pharmaceutical development
- Organization
- Birken AG
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Bernd Hartmann, Dr.
Trauma Hospital Berlin, Warener Str. 7, 12683 Berlin, Germany
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 29, 2012
First Posted
August 6, 2012
Study Start
August 1, 2012
Primary Completion
July 1, 2013
Study Completion
July 1, 2014
Last Updated
September 28, 2015
Results First Posted
September 28, 2015
Record last verified: 2015-08