Efficacy and Safety of PRO-155 Versus Nevanac in Post Phacoemulsification
Phase 2 Randomized, Double-blind Clinical Trial to Evaluate Efficacy and Safety of the Ophthalmic Solution PRO-155 Versus Nevanac 0.1% Ophthalmic Solution in Post Phacoemulsification Patients
1 other identifier
interventional
160
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate efficacy and safety of the ophthalmic solution PRO-155 in patients post phacoemulsification.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_2
Started Dec 2013
Shorter than P25 for phase_2
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 19, 2012
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 6, 2012
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
December 1, 2013
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 1, 2015
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 1, 2015
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
October 30, 2018
CompletedOctober 30, 2018
February 1, 2018
1.2 years
July 19, 2012
June 14, 2016
February 8, 2018
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Percentage of Cellularity in Anterior Chamber
Change from Percentage of Cellularity in anterior chamber after 30 days of treatment.
day 30
Flare in Anterior Chamber
Percentage of Participants with flare in anterior chamber after 30 days of treatment
day 30
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Percentage of Patients Without Ocular Pain
day 30
Mean Aqueous Concentration of Intervention Drug
before surgery
Other Outcomes (4)
Epithelial Defects Detected With Fluorescein
measurements will be made at days 1, 5, 7 and 30
Epithelial Defects Detected With Green Lissamine
measurements will be made at days 1, 5, 7 and 30
Intraocular Pressure
day 30
- +1 more other outcomes
Study Arms (2)
PRO-155
EXPERIMENTALBromfenac 0.09% (0.9mg/mL) Ophthalmic solution Pre-medication: 1 drop each 15 minutes during 1 hour before surgery in the affected eye Maintenance therapy: 1 drop 3 times a day for 30 days
Nevanac
ACTIVE COMPARATORNepafenac 0.1% (1mg/mL) Ophthalmic Suspension Pre-medication: 1 drop each 15 minutes during 1 hour before surgery in the affected eye Maintenance therapy: 1 drop 3 times a day for 30 days
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients older than 18 years who require cataract surgery
- Both genders
- Provide informed consent
- Normal Laboratory results
You may not qualify if:
- Patients with visual acuity of 20/40 or less in the contralateral eye of the surgery
- Patients with any trans-surgical complication
- Patients with a cataract \>NC4, C4 or P4 classified with the system LOCS
- Patients with any active corneal pathology
- Patients under any steroidal treatment (topic, systemic or inhaled)14 days prior surgery or NSAIDs 7 days before the surgery (except low-dose aspirin)
- Patients with IOP \<5 or \>21 mmHg
- Patients that have ocular pain, cellularity or flare at the moment of selection
- Patients with ocular exfoliation, trauma or any inflammatory disease
- Patients with diabetic retinopathy that need treatment or uncontrolled diabetes mellitus
- Patients who are planning cataract surgery of the contralateral eye 14 days after surgery of the study eye
- Patients with history of hypersensitivity or contraindication for any drug used in the study
- Patients under anticoagulant treatment
- Contact lens users
- Pregnant patients, at risk of pregnancy or breastfeeding
- Patients without birth control treatment
- +4 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Hospital Civil de Guadalajara Fray Antonio Alcalde
Guadalajara, Jalisco, 44280, Mexico
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
The study was performed according to the clinical protocol.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Leopoldo M Baiza-Duran MD, Clinical trials Director
- Organization
- Laboratorios Sophia S.A. de C.V.
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Leopoldo M. Baiza-DurĂ¡n, MD
Laboratorios Sophia S.A de C.V.
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 19, 2012
First Posted
August 6, 2012
Study Start
December 1, 2013
Primary Completion
March 1, 2015
Study Completion
April 1, 2015
Last Updated
October 30, 2018
Results First Posted
October 30, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
The personal data were collected and analyzed according to confidentiality policy.