The Effects of Mirror Therapy on Upper Extremity in Stroke Patients
1 other identifier
interventional
60
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to compare treatment efficacy of mirror therapy (MT), mirror therapy combining mesh glove (MG+MT) stimulation, and controlled treatment (CT) in people with stroke.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Sep 2010
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2010
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 27, 2012
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 3, 2012
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 1, 2014
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 1, 2014
CompletedNovember 5, 2015
November 1, 2012
3.7 years
July 27, 2012
November 3, 2015
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA)
The upper-extremity subscale of the FMA contains 33 items to assess motor impairment. Each item is scored on a 3-point ordinal scale (0-cannot perform, 1-performs partially, 2-performs fully and correctly). The sub-score of a proximal shoulder/elbow (0-42) and a distal hand/wrist (0-24) will be also calculated to investigate the treatment effects on separate upper extremity elements.
Baseline, change from baseline in FMA at 4 weeks, change from baseline in FMA at 16 weeks, change from baseline in FMA at 28 weeks
Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT)
* The WMFT composed of 3 parts: Time, Functional ability, and Strength * Includes 15 function-based tasks and 2 strength based tasks * Performance time is referred to as WMFT-TIME * Functional ability is referred to as WMFT-FAS * Items 1-6 involve timed functional tasks, items 7-14 are measures of strength, and the remaining 9 items consist of analyzing movement quality when completing various tasks. * Examiner should test the less affected upper extremity followed by the most affected side. * Uses a 6-point ordinal scale * "0" = "does not attempt with the involved arm" to * "5" = "arm does participate; movement appears to be normal." * Maximum score is 75 * Lower scores are indicative of lower functioning levels * WMFT-TIME allows 120 seconds per task
Baseline, change from baseline in WMFT at 4 weeks, change from baseline in WMFT at 16 weeks, change from baseline in WMFT at 28 weeks
Accelerometers
The accelerometers are used to provide a direct and objective measure of the amount of the impaired arm movement outside the laboratory. Acceleration is sampled at 10 Hz and summed over a user- specified epoch. The recording epoch in this study is 2 seconds; recording capacity is approximately 72 hours. A "threshold-filter" will be applied to the raw recordings to obtain an accurate measure of the duration of arm movement.
Baseline, change from baseline in accelerometers at 4 weeks, change from baseline in accelerometers at 16 weeks, change from baseline in accelerometers at 28 weeks
revised Nottingham Sensory Assessment (rNSA)
The rNSA examines the sensory function of the affected arm and includes tactile sensation (0=Absent, 1=Impaired, 2=Normal), proprioception (0=Absent, 1=Appreciation of movement sense, 2=Direction of movement sense, 3=Joint position sense), and stereognosis (0=Absent, 1=Impaired, 2=Normal) subtests.
Baseline, change from baseline in rNSA at 4 weeks, change from baseline in rNSA at 16 weeks, change from baseline in rNSA at 28 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (6)
Kinematic analyses
Baseline, change from baseline in kinematic parameters at 4 weeks
Motor Activity Log (MAL)
Baseline, change from baseline in MAL at 4 weeks, change from baseline in MAL at 16 weeks, change from baseline in MAL at 28 weeks
Semmes-Weinstein monofilaments
Baseline, change from baseline in Semmes-Weistein monofilaments at 4 weeks, change from baseline in Semmes-Weistein monofilaments at 16 weeks, change from baseline in Semmes-Weistein monofilaments at 28 weeks
Functional Independence Measure (FIM)
Baseline, change from baseline in FIM at 4 weeks, change from baseline in FIM at 16 weeks, change from baseline in FIM at 28 weeks
Stroke Impact Scale version 3.0 (SIS 3.0)
Baseline, change from baseline in SIS at 4 weeks, change from baseline in SIS at 16 weeks, change from baseline in SIS at 28 weeks
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (3)
Mirror therapy
EXPERIMENTALmirror box training with or without sham mesh glove stimulation
Mirror therapy + Mesh glove stimulation
EXPERIMENTALMirror therapy combined with mesh glove stimulation
Controlled intervention
ACTIVE COMPARATORconventional interventions
Interventions
This protocol includes 1 hour mirror therapy and 0.5 hour functional training in a session. The treatment intensity is 1.5 hours/day, 5 days/week, for 4 weeks. MT focuses on symmetrical bimanual movements and simultaneously observing the visual feedback of the unaffected upper extremity reflected by the mirror.
The MG is a two-channel electrical stimulator providing synchronous or reciprocal sensory stimulation with variant amplitudes.
Participants in this group receive a structured protocol based on occupational therapy such as neuro-developmental techniques and task-oriented approach
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- The onset duration more than 3 months
- Demonstration of Brunnstrom stage equal to or above stage III of the affected upper extremity
- No serious cognitive deficits (a score of more than 24 on the Mini Mental State Exam)
- No serious visual and visual-perception impairments
- No concurrent participation in other drug or rehabilitation research
- No serious attention deficits
You may not qualify if:
- Exhibit physician determined major medical problems or poor physical conditions that would interfere with participation
- Excessive pain in any joint that might limit participation
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Shuang-Ho Hospital, Taipei Medical University
New Taipei City, 23561, Taiwan
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Tsan-hon Liou, PhD
Shuang-Ho Hospital, Taipei Medical University
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Ching-yi Wu, ScD
Department of Occupational Therapy, College of Medicine, Chang Gung University
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Keh-chung Lin, ScD
School of Occupational Therapy, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- FACTORIAL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 27, 2012
First Posted
August 3, 2012
Study Start
September 1, 2010
Primary Completion
May 1, 2014
Study Completion
May 1, 2014
Last Updated
November 5, 2015
Record last verified: 2012-11