Absolute Quantification of Coronary Flow Reserve by Stress Perfusion MRI
2 other identifiers
interventional
20
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Coronary artery disease (CAD, coronary heart disease) is the leading cause of death in the U.S., causing 1 in 5 deaths in 2005. The current method for diagnosing coronary artery disease that is considered most accurate is coronary angiography however it involves risk and radiation. Alternatively nuclear imaging test and MRI stress test only permits the semi qualitative analysis of the myocardial perfusion images. In this proposal the investigators will develop a means to calculate Coronary Flow Reserve (CFR) using the MRI. the investigators approach has the potential to reduce mortality from myocardial infarction by effecting a change in the patient management paradigm. Absolute quantification of myocardial perfusion will detect coronary stenosis and CAD in patients with more accuracy than the semi-quantitative or qualitative analysis of perfusion images. Measurement of Coronary Flow Reserve is important for the following reasons: decrease of coronary flow reserve has been identified as a first effect of CAD; it provides an objective measure of treatment efficacy. The purpose of this study is to compare images from nuclear stress test and/or coronary angiography with Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) that will evaluate subjects with coronary artery disease calculating myocardial blood flow using a novel MRI technique combined to an extracellular Gadolinium-based contrast agent and stressor agent
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_2
Started Sep 2012
Shorter than P25 for phase_2
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 30, 2012
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 1, 2012
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2012
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 1, 2014
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 1, 2014
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
March 27, 2015
CompletedAugust 28, 2019
August 1, 2019
1.4 years
July 30, 2012
February 10, 2015
August 16, 2019
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Quantification of Myocardial Blood Volume
The investigators anticipated that a novel MRI imaging protocol using a high relaxivity blood-pool contrast agent (gadofosveset trisodium) would be capable of quantifying coronary flow reserve based on quantification of myocardial blood volume and would be correlated with myocardial flow reserve as measured in low spatial resolution nuclear SPECT scans. Pre- and post- gadofosveset trisodium images were to be used to calculate the myocardial blood volume. Myocardial blood volume is derived from an equation of the relaxation times of hydrogen atoms in the blood and myocardium. If the agent administered did not behave as a true intravascular agent in the myocardium, quantification of myocardial intravascular blood volume (and hence a calculated coronary flow reserve) could not be calculated using the specified approach. In this case, relaxation times would be reported. Relaxation (R) times are measured in inverse seconds.
outcome measured following single MRI scan
Study Arms (1)
coronary artery disease patients
EXPERIMENTALPatients with suspected coronary artery disease prospectively recruited for myocardial perfusion MRI. All subjects to receive 5 ml IV gadofoveset trisodium contrast (Ablavar, Lantheus) at both stress and rest. Stress to be induced using 5 ml intravenous (IV) regadenoson (Lexiscan, Astellas US LLC), and the effects of regadenoson were reversed with 50 mg IV aminophylline following the completion of stress imaging.
Interventions
Regadenoson will be infused intravenously 0.4 mg/5 mL (0.08 mg/mL) as a single bolus.
All subjects to receive 5 ml IV gadofoveset trisodium contrast (Ablavar) at both stress and rest.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Under an Institutional Committee on Human Research board approved protocol, 20 patients with a suspected myocardial ischemic disease with positive stress nuclear medicine test laboratory will be recruited in this prospective study. All subjects will be screened for GFR within 24 hours before the exam. All patients must have a GFR \> 30 mL/min/1.73m2 to be included in the study.
- All subjects will be selected following the Nephrogenic Systemic Fibrosis (NSF) guidelines. All dialysis patients or end-stage renal disease patients with a creatinine clearance of \< 30mL/min will not be selected for the study to avoid NSF.
You may not qualify if:
- Age 18 to 89 years;
- Known contraindication to MR imaging (such as pacemaker placement, magnetic implants, etc);
- Claustrophobia;
- Inability to perform an adequate breath-hold for imaging,
- Inability to provide informed consent;
- all subjects will be will be screened for GFR within 24 hours before the exam and subjects presenting with GFR \< 60 ml/min will be excluded;
- Pregnant and lactating women;
- Patients with hypersensitivity to gadolinium contrast agents, metoprolol, adenosine, or nitroglycerin;
- \) Contra indication for Regadenoson
- nd- or 3rd-degree AV block (except in patients with a functioning artificial pacemaker)
- Sinus node disease (except in patients with a functioning artificial pacemaker)
- Unstable angina
- Acute myocardial infarction
- Known or suspected bronchoconstrictive or bronchospastic lung disease (e.g., asthma)
- Hypersensitivity to adenosine
- +2 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Northwestern Universitylead
- Astellas Pharma Global Development, Inc.collaborator
Study Sites (1)
Northwestern University
Chicago, Illinois, 60611, United States
Related Publications (3)
Rosamond W, Flegal K, Friday G, Furie K, Go A, Greenlund K, Haase N, Ho M, Howard V, Kissela B, Kittner S, Lloyd-Jones D, McDermott M, Meigs J, Moy C, Nichol G, O'Donnell CJ, Roger V, Rumsfeld J, Sorlie P, Steinberger J, Thom T, Wasserthiel-Smoller S, Hong Y; American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. Heart disease and stroke statistics--2007 update: a report from the American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. Circulation. 2007 Feb 6;115(5):e69-171. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.179918. Epub 2006 Dec 28. No abstract available.
PMID: 17194875RESULTElkington AG, Gatehouse PD, Ablitt NA, Yang GZ, Firmin DN, Pennell DJ. Interstudy reproducibility of quantitative perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2005;7(5):815-22. doi: 10.1080/10976640500287877.
PMID: 16353442RESULTWu KC, Zerhouni EA, Judd RM, Lugo-Olivieri CH, Barouch LA, Schulman SP, Blumenthal RS, Lima JA. Prognostic significance of microvascular obstruction by magnetic resonance imaging in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Circulation. 1998 Mar 3;97(8):765-72. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.97.8.765.
PMID: 9498540RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
The small number of subjects results in reduced statistical power; The cohort was selected from patients at a single medical center, potentially reducing generalizability
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr. James Carr
- Organization
- Northwestern University
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
James C Carr, MD
Northwestern University
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- director of cardiovascular imaging
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 30, 2012
First Posted
August 1, 2012
Study Start
September 1, 2012
Primary Completion
February 1, 2014
Study Completion
February 1, 2014
Last Updated
August 28, 2019
Results First Posted
March 27, 2015
Record last verified: 2019-08