Study Stopped
Sponsor decision to terminate study
Safety, Tolerability, and Efficacy of IA Verapamil in the Treatment of Joint Pain in Subjects With Osteoarthritis of the Knee
CS-201: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability, and Efficacy of Intra-Articular Verapamil in the Treatment of JoinT Pain in Subjects With Osteoarthritis of the Knee
1 other identifier
interventional
81
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
This is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multi-center study to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of Intra-Articular (IA) verapamil in the treatment of joint pain in patients with knee osteoarthritis (OA). Subjects will discontinue all analgesic medications for the entire duration of the study, except for acetaminophen (taken on an as needed basis at no more than 2 g/day). At visit 2, subjects who meet all entry criteria will be randomized to receive a single injection of IA verapamil or IA placebo at a ratio of 1:1. Treatments will be given with fluoroscopy or ultrasound to confirm needle placement. Subjects will be monitored for blood pressure and heart rate (sitting and standing) for at least 1 hour post-injection. Subjects will be evaluated at weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, and 12 after treatment.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_1
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
April 1, 2012
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 17, 2012
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 20, 2012
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 1, 2013
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
September 5, 2014
CompletedSeptember 5, 2014
August 1, 2014
10 months
July 17, 2012
August 26, 2014
August 26, 2014
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Compare Efficacy of Verapmil vs Placebo at Week 4
To compare the efficacy of IA verapamil versus IA placebo for pain relief using the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) at week 4.
4 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (8)
Compare Efficacy of Verapamil to Placebo Compared to Baseline
13 weeks
Compare Efficacy of Verapamil to Placebo Compared to Baseline
13 weeks
Compare Efficacy of Verapamil to Placebo Compared to Baseline
13 weeks
Compare Efficacy of Verapamil to Placebo Compared to Baseline
13 weeks
Compare Efficacy of Verapamil to Placebo Compared to Baseline
13 weeks
- +3 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Verapamil
EXPERIMENTALSubjects will be randomized to receive a single injection of IA Verapamil or IA Placebo at a ratio of 1:1.
Placebo
PLACEBO COMPARATORSubjects will be randomized to receive a single injection of IA Verapamil or IA Placebo at a ratio of 1:1.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Be 35-75 years of age and in good general medical and psychological health.
- Be able to speak, read, write, and understand English, understand the consent form, complete study-related procedures, and communicate with the study staff.
- Have OA of at least 1 knee (target knee) for at least 6 months and meet all the following criteria:
- OA documented by standing X-rays anterior-posterior patella-femoral view taken within 1 month of screening visit indicating Kellgren-Lawrence Grade 2 to early-stage Grade 4 radiographic stage of the knee;
- Have pain associated with OA of the target knee for at least 25 of the last 30 days; c. Meet the American College of Rheumatology clinical classification criteria, defined as having pain in the target knee and at least 3 of the following 6 items:
- Age \> 50;
- Morning stiffness \<30 minutes;
- Crepitus on active motion;
- Bony tenderness;
- Bony enlargement;
- No palpable warmth of synovium.
- Target knee does not have any type of orthopedic and/or prosthetic device.
- Based on standard physical examination of the target knee, does not have any neurovascular deficits, any skin abnormalities, any meniscal abnormalities, or any ligament instability.
- At treatment visit 2 prior to randomization, have a score of at least 20 on the WOMAC pain subscale (questions 1-5) for the target knee and an in-clinic average pain intensity score of at least 4/10 on the 0-10 NRS for the 24-hour recall.
- Be willing to maintain any present stable treatment modalities (e.g., acupuncture or physical therapy) and be willing to refrain from initiating any new treatment modalities.
- +3 more criteria
You may not qualify if:
- Subjects who meet any of the following criteria will not be eligible to participate:
- Have a Kellgren-Lawrence Grade 1 radiographic stage of the knee or have Kellgren-Lawrence Grade 4 radiographic end stage of the knee with bone on bone, ie, less than 2 mm joint space.
- Be a candidate for knee replacement within next 6 months.
- Have a body mass index \> 35 kg/m2.
- Have a Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale score \>12 on either subscale or have an established history of major depressive disorder not controlled with medication.
- Have, in the Investigator's opinion, clinically significant abnormalities in clinical laboratory tests (hematology, clinical labs, urinalysis).
- Have a positive urine drug test for illegal drug substances at screening.
- Have, in the Investigator's opinion, clinically significant abnormalities in electrocardiogram readings
- If a female of childbearing potential, have a positive pregnancy test at screening.
- Have significant pain outside the target knee, including significant hip or back pain (bilateral knee OA will be allowed as long as target knee pain can be distinguished from contralateral knee pain and contralateral knee does not require treatment).
- Have pain affecting the target knee that is due to any etiology other than OA.
- Have documented history of inflammatory arthritis, including rheumatoid arthritis.
- Have a meniscal tear in the target knee.
- Have had viscosupplementation with hyaluronic acid products within 6 months prior to screening.
- Have failed to respond to prior treatment with viscosupplementation with hyaluronic acid products.
- +5 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Calosyn Pharma, Inc.lead
- Premier Researchcollaborator
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Stephen Snowdy, PhD
- Organization
- CaloSyn Pharma Inc.
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 1
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 17, 2012
First Posted
July 20, 2012
Study Start
April 1, 2012
Primary Completion
February 1, 2013
Last Updated
September 5, 2014
Results First Posted
September 5, 2014
Record last verified: 2014-08