NCT01644695

Brief Summary

Abdominal wall incisional hernia is a common finding in patients who have undergone previous intra-abdominal surgeries. Common methods of abdominal fascial closure include primary closure, mesh inlay versus onlay, with or without component separation. All these methods have been shown to have recurrence rates for hernia between 3%-60% in the literature. The study describes the investigators innovative and preferred method for reconstruction of the abdominal wall as BARS (bony anchoring reinforcement system). This method manages the abdominal fascial integrity to reduce the recurrence of incisional hernia while providing an aesthetically superior abdominal wall contour.

Trial Health

43
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
85

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Oct 2011

Longer than P75 for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

October 1, 2011

Completed
10 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

July 17, 2012

Completed
2 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

July 19, 2012

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

October 15, 2012

Completed
7.2 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

January 1, 2020

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

January 1, 2020

Completed
Last Updated

October 15, 2012

Status Verified

September 1, 2012

Enrollment Period

8.3 years

First QC Date

July 17, 2012

Results QC Date

September 11, 2012

Last Update Submit

September 11, 2012

Conditions

Keywords

BARSBony Anchoring Reinforcement SystemHerniaIncisionalRecurrentabdominal wall reconstructionabdominal wall defectmeshcomponent separation

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Recurrence Rate

    Evidence of complex incisional hernia recurrence after treatment with BARS procedure.

    ongoing, average 2.4 years

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Intra and Post-Operative Complications

    ongoing, average 2.4 years

Study Arms (1)

Candidate for BARS procedure.

The subjects selected for this trial were over 18 years of age with an appropriate complex, incisional hernia. These patients were consented and treated with the BARS(bony anchoring reinforcement system)procedure.

Procedure: Bony Anchoring Reinforcement System

Interventions

Abdominal exposure was obtained via a lower horizontal incision, a vertical incision, or through a combination horizontal/vertical (ie fleur-di-lis) pattern. Exploratory laparotomy, lysis of intra-abdominal adhesions with hernia sac excision was performed prior to fascial closure. Primary closure of the abdominal fascia was performed with a combination of components separation and placement of biologic mesh over the fascial incision line in onlay fashion. Typically three bone anchors were used to secure the synthetic mesh at the pubic symphysis and two bone anchors to the ASIS bilaterally. The superior aspect of the marlex mesh was sutured to fascia avoiding any incorporation of the costal perichondrium. Quilting sutures were used to secure the mesh to the rest of the abdominal fascia.

Also known as: Mytec, Fasten, Marlex, Allomax, Alloderm, Strattice, Permacol
Candidate for BARS procedure.

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 65 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

Over 18 with Hernia. Included men and women, minorities, and non-english speakers.

You may qualify if:

  • Patients with recurrent abdominal wall incisional hernias
  • Age \> 18
  • No medical contraindications to immunosuppressive therapy (in cases utilizing allograft)
  • Ability and motivation to follow up appropriately
  • Ability and motivation to adhere to rehabilitation regimen
  • Stable sequelae of initial CNS insult

You may not qualify if:

  • Pregnancy
  • Major medical or psychiatric illness, which in the investigator's opinion would prevent completion of treatment and interfere with follow-up.
  • Patient unable to tolerate surgery, rehabilitation, or immunosuppressive therapy.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Institute For Advanced Reconstruction

Shrewsbury, New Jersey, 07702, United States

Location

Related Publications (6)

  • Tong WM, Hope W, Overby DW, Hultman CS. Comparison of outcome after mesh-only repair, laparoscopic component separation, and open component separation. Ann Plast Surg. 2011 May;66(5):551-6. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0b013e31820b3c91.

    PMID: 21346524BACKGROUND
  • Ramirez OM, Ruas E, Dellon AL. "Components separation" method for closure of abdominal-wall defects: an anatomic and clinical study. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1990 Sep;86(3):519-26. doi: 10.1097/00006534-199009000-00023.

    PMID: 2143588BACKGROUND
  • Hawn MT, Snyder CW, Graham LA, Gray SH, Finan KR, Vick CC. Long-term follow-up of technical outcomes for incisional hernia repair. J Am Coll Surg. 2010 May;210(5):648-55, 655-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2009.12.038.

    PMID: 20421023BACKGROUND
  • Bisgaard T, Kehlet H, Bay-Nielsen MB, Iversen MG, Wara P, Rosenberg J, Friis-Andersen HF, Jorgensen LN. Nationwide study of early outcomes after incisional hernia repair. Br J Surg. 2009 Dec;96(12):1452-7. doi: 10.1002/bjs.6728.

    PMID: 19918863BACKGROUND
  • Sisco M, Dumanian GA. A simple technique to anchor prosthetic mesh to bone. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005 Dec;116(7):2059-60. doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000192622.53848.3a. No abstract available.

    PMID: 16327650BACKGROUND
  • Francis KR, Hoffman LA, Cornell C, Cortese A. The use of Mitek anchors to secure mesh in abdominal wall reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1994 Feb;93(2):419-21. doi: 10.1097/00006534-199402000-00034.

    PMID: 8310039BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

HerniaSurgical WoundRecurrence

Interventions

PolypropylenesAlloMaxAllodermstratticePermacol

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Pathological Conditions, AnatomicalPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsWounds and InjuriesDisease AttributesPathologic Processes

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

PolyenesAlkenesHydrocarbons, AcyclicHydrocarbonsOrganic ChemicalsPlasticsPolymersMacromolecular SubstancesBiomedical and Dental MaterialsManufactured MaterialsTechnology, Industry, and Agriculture

Results Point of Contact

Title
Dr. Andrew Elkwood, MD
Organization
Institute For Advanced Reconstruction

Study Officials

  • Andrew I Elkwood, MD

    Institute For Advanced Reconstruction

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
Yes
Restrictive Agreement
No

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
CASE ONLY
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

July 17, 2012

First Posted

July 19, 2012

Study Start

October 1, 2011

Primary Completion

January 1, 2020

Study Completion

January 1, 2020

Last Updated

October 15, 2012

Results First Posted

October 15, 2012

Record last verified: 2012-09

Locations