Study Stopped
the study has never started. The sponsor has decided to not move forward
Evaluation of Luminal Expansion Following Stenting of Femoro-popliteal Occlusive Disease
C-arm CT Evaluation of Luminal Expansion in Stenting Severe Femoro-popliteal Atherosclerotic Disease: Supera Versus LifeStent
1 other identifier
interventional
N/A
1 country
2
Brief Summary
The primary goal of this trial is to compare prospectively stent opening of Supera (IDEV Technologies) versus a reference stent (LifeStent, Bard Medical) using C-arm CT. A secondary goal is to correlate stent opening with stent patency as documented by Doppler ultrasound at one year post implantation.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
Started Dec 2017
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 16, 2012
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 18, 2012
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
December 1, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2017
CompletedJuly 20, 2018
July 1, 2018
Same day
July 16, 2012
July 19, 2018
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Stent expansion
Difference in minimal lumen diameter (MLD), minimal lumen area (MLA) and incomplete stent expansion as defined by C-arm CT between both groups
At the completion of the intervention
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Stent patency
1 year
Study Arms (2)
Supera stent
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe Supera stent is a novel interwoven nitinol stent design with high flexibility and radial strength. The radial force of the Supera stent is 4 times higher than comparable nitinol stent.
LifeStent
ACTIVE COMPARATORLifeStent is likely the best reference nitinol stent for comparison because a low restenosis rate has been reported at 1 year with low target revascularization.
Interventions
Angioplasty and stenting will performed according to the guidelines of the Society of Interventional Radiology and the instruction for use for each stent. Patients will be allocated to Supera stent versus LifeStent based on block randomization (block size 4 patients).
Angioplasty and stenting will performed according to the guidelines of the Society of Interventional Radiology and the instruction for use for each stent. Patients will be allocated to Supera stent versus LifeStent based on block randomization (block size 4 patients).
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age ≥ 18 years
- Patient (or legally authorized representative) must give a written informed consent.
- Symptomatic peripheral-artery disease with moderate or severe intermittent claudication and failure of medical treatment (Rutherford stage 2,3) or chronic critical limb ischemia with pain while the patient is at rest (Rutherford stage 4) or chronic critical limb ischemia with ischemic ulcers (Rutherford stage 5, 6) and stenosis of more than 70 percent or occlusion of the ipsilateral superficial femoral artery and/or proximal popliteal artery with a target-lesion length of ≥ 8 and ≤ 20 cm and at least one patent (less than 50 percent stenosed) tibioperoneal runoff vessel (TASC A,B,C lesions)25. Proximal popliteal artery is defined as the popliteal artery above the joint line. The distal portion of the lesion should be located at least 4 cm above the joint line and the distal end of the stent 2 cm above the joint line.
- ABI ≤ 0.9 at rest. Toe-Brachial Index (TBI) may be used if ABI is inadequate.
- Lesion with a calcification percentage of at least 25% based on CTA evaluation (within 6 months of patient enrolment)
You may not qualify if:
- Acute critical limb ischemia
- Untreated inflow disease of the ipsilateral pelvic arteries (more than 50 percent stenosis or occlusion).
- Renal failure, creatinine clearance \< 50 µmol /l
- Severe allergy to iodine contrast
- Patients with uncorrected bleeding disorders or patients who cannot receive anticoagulation or antiplatelet aggregation therapy
- Lesions \< 8 and \> 20 cm in length
- Calcification volume of less than 25%
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (2)
Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Centre
Halifax, Nova Scotia, B3H 2Y9, Canada
Centre hospitalier de l'université de Montréal
Montreal, Quebec, H2L 4M1, Canada
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Gilles Soulez, MD, MSc
Centre hospitalier de l'université de Montreal
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 16, 2012
First Posted
July 18, 2012
Study Start
December 1, 2017
Primary Completion
December 1, 2017
Study Completion
December 1, 2017
Last Updated
July 20, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-07