NCT01643746

Brief Summary

The primary goal of this trial is to compare prospectively stent opening of Supera (IDEV Technologies) versus a reference stent (LifeStent, Bard Medical) using C-arm CT. A secondary goal is to correlate stent opening with stent patency as documented by Doppler ultrasound at one year post implantation.

Trial Health

30
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Timeline
Completed

Started Dec 2017

Geographic Reach
1 country

2 active sites

Status
withdrawn

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

July 16, 2012

Completed
2 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

July 18, 2012

Completed
5.4 years until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

December 1, 2017

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 1, 2017

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 1, 2017

Completed
Last Updated

July 20, 2018

Status Verified

July 1, 2018

Enrollment Period

Same day

First QC Date

July 16, 2012

Last Update Submit

July 19, 2018

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Stent expansion

    Difference in minimal lumen diameter (MLD), minimal lumen area (MLA) and incomplete stent expansion as defined by C-arm CT between both groups

    At the completion of the intervention

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Stent patency

    1 year

Study Arms (2)

Supera stent

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

The Supera stent is a novel interwoven nitinol stent design with high flexibility and radial strength. The radial force of the Supera stent is 4 times higher than comparable nitinol stent.

Device: Supera Stent

LifeStent

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

LifeStent is likely the best reference nitinol stent for comparison because a low restenosis rate has been reported at 1 year with low target revascularization.

Device: Life Stent

Interventions

Angioplasty and stenting will performed according to the guidelines of the Society of Interventional Radiology and the instruction for use for each stent. Patients will be allocated to Supera stent versus LifeStent based on block randomization (block size 4 patients).

Supera stent

Angioplasty and stenting will performed according to the guidelines of the Society of Interventional Radiology and the instruction for use for each stent. Patients will be allocated to Supera stent versus LifeStent based on block randomization (block size 4 patients).

LifeStent

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Age ≥ 18 years
  • Patient (or legally authorized representative) must give a written informed consent.
  • Symptomatic peripheral-artery disease with moderate or severe intermittent claudication and failure of medical treatment (Rutherford stage 2,3) or chronic critical limb ischemia with pain while the patient is at rest (Rutherford stage 4) or chronic critical limb ischemia with ischemic ulcers (Rutherford stage 5, 6) and stenosis of more than 70 percent or occlusion of the ipsilateral superficial femoral artery and/or proximal popliteal artery with a target-lesion length of ≥ 8 and ≤ 20 cm and at least one patent (less than 50 percent stenosed) tibioperoneal runoff vessel (TASC A,B,C lesions)25. Proximal popliteal artery is defined as the popliteal artery above the joint line. The distal portion of the lesion should be located at least 4 cm above the joint line and the distal end of the stent 2 cm above the joint line.
  • ABI ≤ 0.9 at rest. Toe-Brachial Index (TBI) may be used if ABI is inadequate.
  • Lesion with a calcification percentage of at least 25% based on CTA evaluation (within 6 months of patient enrolment)

You may not qualify if:

  • Acute critical limb ischemia
  • Untreated inflow disease of the ipsilateral pelvic arteries (more than 50 percent stenosis or occlusion).
  • Renal failure, creatinine clearance \< 50 µmol /l
  • Severe allergy to iodine contrast
  • Patients with uncorrected bleeding disorders or patients who cannot receive anticoagulation or antiplatelet aggregation therapy
  • Lesions \< 8 and \> 20 cm in length
  • Calcification volume of less than 25%

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (2)

Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Centre

Halifax, Nova Scotia, B3H 2Y9, Canada

Location

Centre hospitalier de l'université de Montréal

Montreal, Quebec, H2L 4M1, Canada

Location

Study Officials

  • Gilles Soulez, MD, MSc

    Centre hospitalier de l'université de Montreal

    STUDY DIRECTOR
0

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

July 16, 2012

First Posted

July 18, 2012

Study Start

December 1, 2017

Primary Completion

December 1, 2017

Study Completion

December 1, 2017

Last Updated

July 20, 2018

Record last verified: 2018-07

Locations