A Multi-Site Trial of the Impact of Assistive Technology With Assistance Users and Their Caregivers
CATS
1 other identifier
interventional
240
1 country
3
Brief Summary
Many individuals with mobility limitations, especially those who are older and have more severe impairments, use a combination of assistive devices and personal assistance to meet their needs. Assistive technology (AT), which includes devices such as wheelchairs, walkers, bathroom grab bars, and dressing aids, helps facilitate day-to-day activities and social participation (basic and instrumental activities of daily living) among these individuals and may decrease their dependence on human assistance. Although some research has reported beneficial outcomes of AT use, few studies have used controlled experimental designs. Furthermore, the results are often difficult to interpret because the AT interventions are only vaguely described. Another concern is that many individuals receive help from others, but scant attention has been paid to the impact of AT on caregivers. This neglect produces an incomplete portrayal of the effect of AT interventions. The proposed study addresses these deficiencies by evaluating the effects of a formalized dyadic AT intervention on individuals with mobility limitations and on their caregivers. The Assistive Technology Provision, Updating and Training (ATPUT)intervention involves a detailed in-home assessment of participants' current AT; the negotiation and implementation of a personal AT plan with the participants and their caregivers; and the provision of AT devices, non-structural home modifications, and device training. Objectives:
- 1.To determine the efficacy of the Assistive Technology Provision, Updating and Training intervention for assistance users and for their caregivers.
- 2.To explore how the intervention is experienced by these individuals and to help explain the study findings.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_2
Started Dec 2011
Longer than P75 for phase_2
3 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 21, 2011
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
December 1, 2011
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 13, 2012
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 1, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 1, 2017
CompletedApril 11, 2016
April 1, 2016
4.4 years
November 21, 2011
April 8, 2016
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Caregiver Assistive Technology Outcome Measure
The caregiver assistive technology outcome measure captures physical and psychological associated with informal care provision.
58 Weeks
Functional Autonomy Measure (Système de mesure de l'autonomie fonctionnelle (SMAF))
A composite from two sub-scales of the SMAF will be used the primary outcome measure for users (self-care and mobility)
58 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (7)
Sub-scale scores from the Functional Autonomy Measure (Système de mesure de l'autonomie fonctionnelle (SMAF))
baseline (Time 0), week 6 (Time 1), week 22 (Time 2) and at week 58 (Time 3)
Sub-scale scores from the Caregiver Assistive Technology Outcome Measure
baseline (Time 0), week 6 (Time 1), week 22 (Time 2) and at week 58 (Time 3).
Euro-QOL 5
baseline (Time 0), week 6 (Time 1), week 22 (Time 2) and at week 58 (Time 3).
Caregiver Burden Inventory
baseline (Time 0), week 6 (Time 1), week 22 (Time 2) and at week 58 (Time 3).
Reintegration to Normal Living Index (RNLI)
baseline (Time 0), week 6 (Time 1), week 22 (Time 2) and at week 58 (Time 3).
- +2 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Assistive technology
EXPERIMENTALThe home based AT Provision, Updating and Tune-Up (ATPUT) Intervention will include recommendations for assistive technology, possibly entailing financial assistance to repair or to acquire new AT, and training. New equipment will likely include devices such as bathroom grab bars, raised toilet seats, walkers, and bath chairs.
Customary care
ACTIVE COMPARATORParticipants in this arm will receive customary care.
Interventions
The home based AT Provision, Updating and Tune-Up (ATPUT) Intervention will consist of 5 components: 1) identification and prioritization of problematic activities by the assistance user and his/her principal, cohabitating caregiver; 2) in-residence assessment of the daily activities and social participation and preferences of the assistance user; 3) detailed review of the AT and human assistance that are currently being used; 4) recommendations by an occupational therapist for possible changes in the personal assistance strategy; 5) negotiation of an ATPUT Personal Plan with the assistance user and her/his principal caregiver. The intervention occurs over a six week period and involves 3 to 6 visits from an occupational therapist.
Participants in the customary care group receive normal occupational therapy services.Occupational Therapy
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- daily activity and/or mobility disability
- referred to homecare
- have an unpaid informal caregiver who is above the age of consent and willing to participate in the study
- can communicate in English or French.
You may not qualify if:
- cognitive impairments that are likely to prevent them from reliably completing the study questionnaires.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Centre de Recherche de l'Institut Universitaire de Geriatrie de Montreallead
- Simon Fraser Universitycollaborator
- Duke Universitycollaborator
- University of Ottawacollaborator
Study Sites (3)
Simon Fraser University- Gerontolgy Research Centre
Vancouver, British Columbia, V6B 5K3, Canada
Élisabeth Bruyère Research Centre
Ottawa, Ontario, K1N 5C8, Canada
University of Montreal
Montreal, Quebec, H3W 1W5, Canada
Related Publications (2)
Ben Mortenson W, Demers L, Fuhrer MJ, Jutai JW, Bilkey J, Plante M, DeRuyter F. Effects of a caregiver-inclusive assistive technology intervention: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Geriatr. 2018 Apr 18;18(1):97. doi: 10.1186/s12877-018-0783-6.
PMID: 29669536DERIVEDDemers L, Mortenson WB, Fuhrer MJ, Jutai JW, Plante M, Mah J, DeRuyter F. Effect of a tailored assistive technology intervention on older adults and their family caregiver: a pragmatic study protocol. BMC Geriatr. 2016 May 13;16:103. doi: 10.1186/s12877-016-0269-3.
PMID: 27177609DERIVED
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Louise Demers, PhD
Université de Montréal
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Directrice, Département de l'ergothérapie
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 21, 2011
First Posted
July 13, 2012
Study Start
December 1, 2011
Primary Completion
May 1, 2016
Study Completion
March 1, 2017
Last Updated
April 11, 2016
Record last verified: 2016-04