NCT01639443

Brief Summary

In this research study, investigators use colonoscopy as a case example to evaluate a predictive overbooking model derived using patient-level predictors of absenteeism. The no-show overbooking intervention employs a logistic regression model that uses patient data to predict the odds of no-showing with 80% accuracy. These projected no-show appointments will be overbooked by clerks for patients who agree to join a "fast track" short-call line. By rapidly processing endoscopy patients and moving them out of traditional slots, investigators predict more scheduling slots would become available for patients awaiting colonoscopy.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
180

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jul 2013

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

July 9, 2012

Completed
3 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

July 12, 2012

Completed
12 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

July 8, 2013

Completed
2 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

July 6, 2015

Completed
12 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

June 30, 2016

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

October 31, 2016

Completed
Last Updated

April 12, 2018

Status Verified

March 1, 2018

Enrollment Period

2 years

First QC Date

July 9, 2012

Results QC Date

June 30, 2016

Last Update Submit

March 13, 2018

Conditions

Keywords

quality improvementOrganization and AdministrationCosts and cost analysisPatient satisfactionHealth plan implementation

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Percentage of GI Clinic Capacity Filled

    Investigators' primary objective will be to evaluate the impact of no-show predictive overbooking on percentage of the GI endoscopy clinic that are filled on a given day. Days where at least one Fast-tracked patient attended an appointment were compared to days where only Control patients attended appointments. Percentage of GI Clinic Capacity is calculated as the number of appointments completed divided by number of appointment spots available on a given day. This percentage was compared between Fast-tracked days and Control days, using data from 1672 patients.

    After 12 months of running study in clinic

Secondary Outcomes (5)

  • Scheduling-to-procedure Lag Time

    After 12 months of running study in clinic

  • Daily Service Denials ("Bumps")

    After 12 months of running study in clinic

  • Advanced Adenoma Detection/Cecal Intubation Rates

    After 20 months of running study in clinic

  • Length of Workday

    After 12 months of running study in clinic

  • Cost Comparisons

    After 12 months of running study in clinic

Study Arms (2)

Fast-tracked

EXPERIMENTAL

'Predictive no-show overbooking' intervention. Patients who volunteer to enroll in "fast-track" line, which gives them an opportunity to overbook their appointment for endoscopy earlier in a predictive no-show slots.

Other: Predictive no-show overbooking

Control

NO INTERVENTION

Patients who are scheduled routinely

Interventions

During intervention period, every Veteran scheduled for an endoscopy will be offered "fast-track" offer, which gives them a chance to get their endoscopy procedure done earlier than usual scheduling by overbooking their appointment in a predictive no-show slot.

Fast-tracked

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Patients who are scheduled for upper endoscopy and agree to the terms of "fast track" offer.

You may not qualify if:

  • If a patient expresses concern about service denial, confusion about the bargain, or refuses to participate, the investigators will schedule these patients routinely.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, West Los Angeles, CA

West Los Angeles, California, 90073, United States

Location

Related Publications (3)

  • Reid MW, Cohen S, Wang H, Kaung A, Patel A, Tashjian V, Williams DL Jr, Martinez B, Spiegel BM. Preventing patient absenteeism: validation of a predictive overbooking model. Am J Manag Care. 2015 Dec;21(12):902-10.

  • Reid MW, May FP, Martinez B, Cohen S, Wang H, Williams DL Jr, Spiegel BM. Preventing Endoscopy Clinic No-Shows: Prospective Validation of a Predictive Overbooking Model. Am J Gastroenterol. 2016 Sep;111(9):1267-73. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2016.269. Epub 2016 Jul 5.

  • May FP, Reid MW, Cohen S, Dailey F, Spiegel BM. Predictive overbooking and active recruitment increases uptake of endoscopy appointments among African American patients. Gastrointest Endosc. 2017 Apr;85(4):700-705. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2016.09.001. Epub 2016 Sep 10.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Colonic NeoplasmsPatient Satisfaction

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Colorectal NeoplasmsIntestinal NeoplasmsGastrointestinal NeoplasmsDigestive System NeoplasmsNeoplasms by SiteNeoplasmsDigestive System DiseasesGastrointestinal DiseasesColonic DiseasesIntestinal DiseasesTreatment Adherence and ComplianceHealth BehaviorBehavior

Limitations and Caveats

This study was impeded by our ability to schedule Veterans into Fast-Tracked appointments. Although the method is very promising, integration of predictive scheduling is vital for this program to benefit Veterans on a large scale.

Results Point of Contact

Title
Jennifer Talley Soares
Organization
West Los Angeles VA / Cedars-Sinai Medical Center

Study Officials

  • Paul G. Shekelle, MD PhD MPH

    VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, West Los Angeles, CA

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
FED
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

July 9, 2012

First Posted

July 12, 2012

Study Start

July 8, 2013

Primary Completion

July 6, 2015

Study Completion

June 30, 2016

Last Updated

April 12, 2018

Results First Posted

October 31, 2016

Record last verified: 2018-03

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations