NCT01636765

Brief Summary

This is a study to evaluate inter- and intra-rater reliability of the Clinician Erythema Assessment Scale. There is no treatment (intervention) associated with this study.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
104

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started May 2012

Shorter than P25 for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

May 1, 2012

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

July 1, 2012

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

July 1, 2012

Completed
8 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

July 9, 2012

Completed
1 day until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

July 10, 2012

Completed
1.4 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

November 15, 2013

Completed
Last Updated

November 18, 2019

Status Verified

November 1, 2019

Enrollment Period

2 months

First QC Date

July 9, 2012

Results QC Date

September 12, 2013

Last Update Submit

November 15, 2019

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Inter-rater Reliability of the Clinician Erythema Assessment (CEA) Scale

    Inter-rater agreement (among raters) of the CEA scores (0=clear skin with no signs of erythema; 1=almost clear of erythema, slight redness; 2=mild erythema, definite redness; 3=moderate erythema, marked redness; 4=severe erythema, fiery redness) evaluated using Kendall's coefficient of concordance (Kendall's W). Each of 7 raters scored 104 participant's severity of erythema due to rosacea using the CEA Scale at 2 different time points at day 1. The overall inter-rater agreement for Kendall's W for all raters combined was estimated based on the average of the scores from those 2 different time points. The degree of agreement of the point estimates of Kendall's W was interpreted according to the reference range scale that was pre-defined as: ≤ 0=poor, 0.00-0.20=slight, 0.21-0.40=fair, 0.41-0.60=moderate, 0.61-0.80=substantial and 0.81-1.00=almost perfect. The 95% confidence interval for Kendall's W was provided.

    Day 1

  • Intra-rater Reliability of the CEA Scale

    Intra-rater (within raters) agreement of the CEA scores (0=clear skin with no signs of erythema; 1=almost clear of erythema, slight redness; 2=mild erythema, definite redness; 3=moderate erythema, marked redness; 4=severe erythema, fiery redness) was evaluated by weighted Kappa statistics (WKS). WKS were calculated for each of 7 raters who evaluated 104 participant's severity of erythema of rosacea using the CEA scale, assessing agreement between 2 different time points at day 1. The overall intra-rater agreement for WKS for all raters combined was estimated by pooling WKS for each rater using a chi-square statistic. The degree of agreement of the point estimates of WKS was interpreted according to the reference range scale that was predefined as: ≤ 0=poor, 0.00-0.20=slight, 0.21-0.40=fair, 0.41-0.60=moderate, 0.61-0.80=substantial and 0.81-1.00=almost perfect. The 95% confidence interval for Kappa statistics was provided.

    Day 1

Study Arms (1)

All participants

Patients with facial erythema associated with rosacea. There was no intervention in this study.

Drug: No Intervention

Interventions

No intervention.

All participants

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

Patients with facial erythema related to rosacea

You may qualify if:

  • Rosacea

You may not qualify if:

  • Unwilling to remove all facial make-up

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Unknown Facility

Austin, Texas, United States

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

ErythemaRosacea

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Skin DiseasesSkin and Connective Tissue DiseasesSkin ManifestationsSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Results Point of Contact

Title
Therapeutic Area Head,
Organization
Allergan, Inc

Study Officials

  • Medical Director

    Allergan

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restriction Type
OTHER
Restrictive Agreement
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
CASE ONLY
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

July 9, 2012

First Posted

July 10, 2012

Study Start

May 1, 2012

Primary Completion

July 1, 2012

Study Completion

July 1, 2012

Last Updated

November 18, 2019

Results First Posted

November 15, 2013

Record last verified: 2019-11

Locations