Study of Inter- and Intra-rater Reliability of the Clinician Erythema Assessment Scale
1 other identifier
observational
104
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This is a study to evaluate inter- and intra-rater reliability of the Clinician Erythema Assessment Scale. There is no treatment (intervention) associated with this study.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for all trials
Started May 2012
Shorter than P25 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2012
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 1, 2012
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 1, 2012
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 9, 2012
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 10, 2012
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
November 15, 2013
CompletedNovember 18, 2019
November 1, 2019
2 months
July 9, 2012
September 12, 2013
November 15, 2019
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Inter-rater Reliability of the Clinician Erythema Assessment (CEA) Scale
Inter-rater agreement (among raters) of the CEA scores (0=clear skin with no signs of erythema; 1=almost clear of erythema, slight redness; 2=mild erythema, definite redness; 3=moderate erythema, marked redness; 4=severe erythema, fiery redness) evaluated using Kendall's coefficient of concordance (Kendall's W). Each of 7 raters scored 104 participant's severity of erythema due to rosacea using the CEA Scale at 2 different time points at day 1. The overall inter-rater agreement for Kendall's W for all raters combined was estimated based on the average of the scores from those 2 different time points. The degree of agreement of the point estimates of Kendall's W was interpreted according to the reference range scale that was pre-defined as: ≤ 0=poor, 0.00-0.20=slight, 0.21-0.40=fair, 0.41-0.60=moderate, 0.61-0.80=substantial and 0.81-1.00=almost perfect. The 95% confidence interval for Kendall's W was provided.
Day 1
Intra-rater Reliability of the CEA Scale
Intra-rater (within raters) agreement of the CEA scores (0=clear skin with no signs of erythema; 1=almost clear of erythema, slight redness; 2=mild erythema, definite redness; 3=moderate erythema, marked redness; 4=severe erythema, fiery redness) was evaluated by weighted Kappa statistics (WKS). WKS were calculated for each of 7 raters who evaluated 104 participant's severity of erythema of rosacea using the CEA scale, assessing agreement between 2 different time points at day 1. The overall intra-rater agreement for WKS for all raters combined was estimated by pooling WKS for each rater using a chi-square statistic. The degree of agreement of the point estimates of WKS was interpreted according to the reference range scale that was predefined as: ≤ 0=poor, 0.00-0.20=slight, 0.21-0.40=fair, 0.41-0.60=moderate, 0.61-0.80=substantial and 0.81-1.00=almost perfect. The 95% confidence interval for Kappa statistics was provided.
Day 1
Study Arms (1)
All participants
Patients with facial erythema associated with rosacea. There was no intervention in this study.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
Patients with facial erythema related to rosacea
You may qualify if:
- Rosacea
You may not qualify if:
- Unwilling to remove all facial make-up
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Allerganlead
Study Sites (1)
Unknown Facility
Austin, Texas, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Therapeutic Area Head,
- Organization
- Allergan, Inc
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Medical Director
Allergan
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- CASE ONLY
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 9, 2012
First Posted
July 10, 2012
Study Start
May 1, 2012
Primary Completion
July 1, 2012
Study Completion
July 1, 2012
Last Updated
November 18, 2019
Results First Posted
November 15, 2013
Record last verified: 2019-11