NCT01634698

Brief Summary

The relative-dose-response test (RDR) is considered to be the most accurate method for evaluating vitamin A nutritional status (VANS) in patients suffering from liver disease, as it infers the reserves of the vitamin in the liver. However, for the RDR test to reflect VANS in patients suffering from chronic liver disease, factors inherent to the disease need to be considered, such as possible malabsorption, advanced age, a drop in synthesis and/or the release of retinol binding protein (RBP), which would result in an inadequate response to the RDR test. Thus, the objective of present study is to assess the adequacy of two different protocol for using the RDR test in patients with cirrhosis and cirrhosis-related hepatocellular carcinoma. Methods: The sample group was comprised of 178 patients at Federal University of Rio de Janeiro University Hospital (111 men) with several etiologies of liver cirrhosis at different stages in the progression of the disease. They were sorted into two groups, according to the retinyl palmitate dosage (1500 IU or 2500 IU) received at T0 (blood sample taken following a 12-hour fast). Following supplementation, the investigators took further blood samples five and seven hours later (T5 and T7). The investigators assessed VANS via concentrations of serum retinol and RBP, as well as by way of the RDR test. The cutoff points the investigators used for denoting inadequacy in the indicators retinol and RDR were, respectively, \< 1.05 µmol/L and ≥ 20%. To classify the degrees of severity of the disease the investigators used the criteria established by Child \& Pugh (1973).

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
178

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Oct 2007

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

October 1, 2007

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 1, 2007

Completed
1 year until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 1, 2008

Completed
3.6 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

June 25, 2012

Completed
11 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

July 6, 2012

Completed
Last Updated

July 6, 2012

Status Verified

May 1, 2012

Enrollment Period

2 months

First QC Date

June 25, 2012

Last Update Submit

July 2, 2012

Conditions

Keywords

chronic liver diseasecirrhosisvitamin ARDR testretinol-binding protein

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Change from Baseline in retinol status (RDR test) at 5 and/or 7 hour after supplementation

    Therapeutic response is evaluated by means of circulating serum retinol, 5 and 7 hours after the administration of vitamin A. The RDR was calculated by the following formula, using the values of serum retinol in the three times of blood collection (Loerch et al., 1979), expressed in percentages: RDR (%) = \[(A0-Ax) / Ax\] x100 where A0 is the serum retinol at time 0 (fasting) and Ax is the serum retinol 5 or 7 h after administration of vitamin A. It was used as the RDR cutoff ≥ 20%, indicating indirect hepatic reserve inadequate

    RDR will be calculated for the two intervention groups (1500 or 2500 IU vitamin A), for the two moments of blood sampling, 5 and 7 hours after supplementation.

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • serum retinol-binding protein (RBP)

    RBP were analyzed at baseline, 5 and 7 hours after supplementation as a variable that explain the appropriate response or failure to respond to the RDR test.

Study Arms (2)

RDR test (1500 UI vitamin A)

EXPERIMENTAL

81 patients with several etiologies of liver cirrhosis at different stages in the progression of the disease received 1500 UI retinyl palmitate dosage at T0 (blood sample taken following a 12-hour fast). Following supplementation, we took further blood samples five and seven hours later (T5 and T7).

Dietary Supplement: retinyl palmitate (UNICEF, Melbourne, Australia)

RDR test (2500 IU vitamin A)

EXPERIMENTAL

81 patients with several etiologies of liver cirrhosis at different stages in the progression of the disease received 2500 UI retinyl palmitate dosage at T0 (blood sample taken following a 12-hour fast). Following supplementation, we took further blood samples five and seven hours later (T5 and T7).

Dietary Supplement: retinyl palmitate (UNICEF, Melbourne, Australia)

Interventions

the patients received an oral dose of 1500 IU or 2500 IU, once.

Also known as: vitamin A
RDR test (1500 UI vitamin A)RDR test (2500 IU vitamin A)

Eligibility Criteria

Age20 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • diagnosis of liver cirrhosis of viral etiology, alcoholic or metabolic action

You may not qualify if:

  • malabsorption syndromes
  • moderate or severe infection
  • diabetes mellitus using insulin renal, cardiac or respiratory
  • therapeutic doses of vitamin A in the 6 months prior to data collection

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Gabriela Villaça Chaves

Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, 22010050, Brazil

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Peres WA, Chaves GV, Goncalves JC, Ramalho A, Coelho HS. Vitamin A deficiency in patients with hepatitis C virus-related chronic liver disease. Br J Nutr. 2011 Dec;106(11):1724-31. doi: 10.1017/S0007114511002145. Epub 2011 Jun 8.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Fibrosis

Interventions

retinol palmitateUnited NationsVitamin A

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Pathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

International AgenciesOrganizationsHealth Care Economics and OrganizationsRetinoidsCarotenoidsPolyenesAlkenesHydrocarbons, AcyclicHydrocarbonsOrganic ChemicalsCyclohexenesCyclohexanesCycloparaffinsHydrocarbons, AlicyclicHydrocarbons, CyclicTerpenesDiterpenesPigments, BiologicalBiological Factors

Study Officials

  • Gabriela V Chaves, PhD

    Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Intervention Model
CROSSOVER
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
PhD

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

June 25, 2012

First Posted

July 6, 2012

Study Start

October 1, 2007

Primary Completion

December 1, 2007

Study Completion

December 1, 2008

Last Updated

July 6, 2012

Record last verified: 2012-05

Locations