Relative-dose-response Test (RDR) Adaptation for Chronic Liver Disease
Responsiveness of RDR Test to Assess Hepatic Vitamin A Stores in Chronic Liver Disease
1 other identifier
interventional
178
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The relative-dose-response test (RDR) is considered to be the most accurate method for evaluating vitamin A nutritional status (VANS) in patients suffering from liver disease, as it infers the reserves of the vitamin in the liver. However, for the RDR test to reflect VANS in patients suffering from chronic liver disease, factors inherent to the disease need to be considered, such as possible malabsorption, advanced age, a drop in synthesis and/or the release of retinol binding protein (RBP), which would result in an inadequate response to the RDR test. Thus, the objective of present study is to assess the adequacy of two different protocol for using the RDR test in patients with cirrhosis and cirrhosis-related hepatocellular carcinoma. Methods: The sample group was comprised of 178 patients at Federal University of Rio de Janeiro University Hospital (111 men) with several etiologies of liver cirrhosis at different stages in the progression of the disease. They were sorted into two groups, according to the retinyl palmitate dosage (1500 IU or 2500 IU) received at T0 (blood sample taken following a 12-hour fast). Following supplementation, the investigators took further blood samples five and seven hours later (T5 and T7). The investigators assessed VANS via concentrations of serum retinol and RBP, as well as by way of the RDR test. The cutoff points the investigators used for denoting inadequacy in the indicators retinol and RDR were, respectively, \< 1.05 µmol/L and ≥ 20%. To classify the degrees of severity of the disease the investigators used the criteria established by Child \& Pugh (1973).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Oct 2007
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
October 1, 2007
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2007
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2008
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 25, 2012
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 6, 2012
CompletedJuly 6, 2012
May 1, 2012
2 months
June 25, 2012
July 2, 2012
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change from Baseline in retinol status (RDR test) at 5 and/or 7 hour after supplementation
Therapeutic response is evaluated by means of circulating serum retinol, 5 and 7 hours after the administration of vitamin A. The RDR was calculated by the following formula, using the values of serum retinol in the three times of blood collection (Loerch et al., 1979), expressed in percentages: RDR (%) = \[(A0-Ax) / Ax\] x100 where A0 is the serum retinol at time 0 (fasting) and Ax is the serum retinol 5 or 7 h after administration of vitamin A. It was used as the RDR cutoff ≥ 20%, indicating indirect hepatic reserve inadequate
RDR will be calculated for the two intervention groups (1500 or 2500 IU vitamin A), for the two moments of blood sampling, 5 and 7 hours after supplementation.
Secondary Outcomes (1)
serum retinol-binding protein (RBP)
RBP were analyzed at baseline, 5 and 7 hours after supplementation as a variable that explain the appropriate response or failure to respond to the RDR test.
Study Arms (2)
RDR test (1500 UI vitamin A)
EXPERIMENTAL81 patients with several etiologies of liver cirrhosis at different stages in the progression of the disease received 1500 UI retinyl palmitate dosage at T0 (blood sample taken following a 12-hour fast). Following supplementation, we took further blood samples five and seven hours later (T5 and T7).
RDR test (2500 IU vitamin A)
EXPERIMENTAL81 patients with several etiologies of liver cirrhosis at different stages in the progression of the disease received 2500 UI retinyl palmitate dosage at T0 (blood sample taken following a 12-hour fast). Following supplementation, we took further blood samples five and seven hours later (T5 and T7).
Interventions
the patients received an oral dose of 1500 IU or 2500 IU, once.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- diagnosis of liver cirrhosis of viral etiology, alcoholic or metabolic action
You may not qualify if:
- malabsorption syndromes
- moderate or severe infection
- diabetes mellitus using insulin renal, cardiac or respiratory
- therapeutic doses of vitamin A in the 6 months prior to data collection
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Gabriela Villaça Chaves
Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, 22010050, Brazil
Related Publications (1)
Peres WA, Chaves GV, Goncalves JC, Ramalho A, Coelho HS. Vitamin A deficiency in patients with hepatitis C virus-related chronic liver disease. Br J Nutr. 2011 Dec;106(11):1724-31. doi: 10.1017/S0007114511002145. Epub 2011 Jun 8.
PMID: 21736776RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Gabriela V Chaves, PhD
Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- PhD
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 25, 2012
First Posted
July 6, 2012
Study Start
October 1, 2007
Primary Completion
December 1, 2007
Study Completion
December 1, 2008
Last Updated
July 6, 2012
Record last verified: 2012-05