Efficacy of Sacral Nerve Modulation in Severe Refractory Constipation
CONSTIMOD
1 other identifier
interventional
20
1 country
11
Brief Summary
Subjects with refractory chronic constipation are offered two conventional therapeutic strategies: either medical treatment, either surgery (in the case of medication failure). Nevertheless, a procedure less invasive than surgery could be an alternative strategy: the sacral nerve modulation. This procedure consists in stimulating the nerves which control the contractions of the colon and so the defecation phenomenon. Several open trials have suggested that sacral nerve modulation may be effective in reducing constipation and related symptoms. The aim of this randomized clinical trial is to assess the efficacy of the sacral nerve stimulation in patients with constipation.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_2
Started Jun 2012
11 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2012
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 11, 2012
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 27, 2012
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 1, 2013
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 1, 2015
CompletedJuly 23, 2015
July 1, 2015
1.4 years
June 11, 2012
July 22, 2015
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Percentage of patients showing a positive response to sacral nerve stimulation at 2 months
Percentage of patients showing a positive response to sacral nerve stimulation during the period " ON " compared with the period " OFF " based on an objective assessment of the number of feces and their characteristics
2 months of the stimualtion period
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Clinical characteristics, manometry data, Wexner score of responders to stimulation during the temporary stimulation test (period before the permanent implantation)
3 weeks between temporary and permanent implantations
Clinical characteristics, manometry data, Wexner score of responders to short-term stimulation
2 months after permanent implantation
Efficacy of neuromodulation
1 year after permanent implantation
Manometry data, Wexner, QoL and EVA scores, time of colonic transit of responders to prolonged stimulation
1 year after permanent implantation
To evaluate the investigator opinion about the neuromodulation response, using the patient diary.
1 year after permanent implantation
Study Arms (2)
Arm on-off
EXPERIMENTALAfter the definitive implantation, stimulators are placed in position OFF during 8 weeks. Then all the stimulators are switched OFF for 15 days. Finally stimulators are switched ON for the second arm during 8 weeks
Arm off-on
EXPERIMENTALAfter the definitive implantation, stimulators are placed in position ON during 8 weeks. Then all the stimulators are switched OFF for 15 days. Finally stimulators are maintained in position OFF during 8 weeks
Interventions
After the definitive implantation, stimulators are placed in position ON (arm on-off) or OFF (arm off-on) for the first arm and in position OFF for the second arm during 8 weeks. Then all the stimulators are switched OFF (both first and second arms) for 15 days. Finally stimulators are maintained in position OFF for the first arm and switched ON for the second arm during 8 weeks
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age ≥ 18 years old
- Constipation defined by at least two of the following criteria :
- Frequency of 2 stools or less per week
- Severe outlet constipation, i.e. need to use digital extraction or enemas more than 25% of time
- Sensation of incomplete evacuation more than 25% of time
- Refractory constipation since at least 1 year to medical treatment (drug treatment and/or biofeedback) conducted in the centre (failure or intolerance to laxative osmotic treatments, stimulants, and prucalopride) for which surgery is discussed
- Patients having social security system
- Patients having read and signed informed consent form
You may not qualify if:
- Constipation secondary to ano-rectal malformation, surgical sequel, colorectal or anal organic lesions, or pelvi-perineal static disorder indicated for surgical treatment
- Constipation secondary to neurological pathology and/or concomitant treatments intake (opiates, anticholinergic agents)
- Partial colectomy history
- Patients in whom implantation of stimulating electrode is impossible due to anatomical reasons (e.g. sacral agenesis)
- Pregnant female patients or with childbearing potential without adequate contraceptive barrier (oestrogen-progesterone contraceptives or intra-uterine device)
- Skin disease associated with a risk of infection - in the opinion of the investigator
- Patient with pacemaker or defibrillator
- Patient exposed to resonance magnetic imaging
- Psychiatric disease incompatible with use of the treatment - in the opinion of the investigator
- Patient misunderstanding oral and written French language
- Patient participating to another study
- Patients who don't complete the first diary without missing data (concerning items used to define the primary endpoint)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (11)
Service d'hépato-gastroentérologie et oncologie digestive
Bordeaux, Bordeaux, 33075, France
Service d' Hépato-gastro-entérologie
CHU de Limoges, Limoges, 87000, France
Service d'exploration fonctionnelle digestive -Hospices Civils de Lyon
Lyon, Lyon, 69000, France
: Clinique de chirurgie digestive et endocrinienne. Institut des Maladies de l'Appareil Digestif (IMAD
Nantes, Nantes, 44000, France
Service d'hépato-gastroentérologie - CHU estaing
Clermont-Ferrand, 63000, France
Service de gastroentérologie - AP HP
Colombes, 92000, France
Service de Chirurgie générale - CHU de Grenoble
Grenoble, 38000, France
Service de gastroentérologie - hopital nord -AP-HM
Marseille, 13000, France
SMAD CHU Pontchaillou -Rennes
Rennes, 35000, France
Service de physiologie digestive, urinaire, respiratoire et sportive - CHU de rouen
Rouen, 76000, France
Service d'hépato-gastroentérologie et explorations fonctionnelles digestives - CHU de Tours
Tours, 37000, France
Related Publications (1)
Zerbib F, Siproudhis L, Lehur PA, Germain C, Mion F, Leroi AM, Coffin B, Le Sidaner A, Vitton V, Bouyssou-Cellier C, Chene G; CONSTIMOD study investigators. Randomized clinical trial of sacral nerve stimulation for refractory constipation. Br J Surg. 2017 Feb;104(3):205-213. doi: 10.1002/bjs.10326. Epub 2016 Oct 25.
PMID: 27779312DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Frank ZERBIB, Professor
University Hospital, Bordeaux
- STUDY CHAIR
Genevieve CHENE, Professor
University Hospital, Bordeaux
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 11, 2012
First Posted
June 27, 2012
Study Start
June 1, 2012
Primary Completion
November 1, 2013
Study Completion
January 1, 2015
Last Updated
July 23, 2015
Record last verified: 2015-07