NCT01628627

Brief Summary

Aim of this study is to evaluate safety and efficacy of transcutaneous frequency modulated electromagnetic neural stimulation (FREMS) to treat symptomatic peripheral neuropathy in patients with diabetes mellitus.

Trial Health

90
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
164

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for phase_4

Timeline
Completed

Started May 2006

Longer than P75 for phase_4

Geographic Reach
3 countries

6 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

May 1, 2006

Completed
3.9 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

April 1, 2010

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

April 1, 2010

Completed
2.2 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

June 23, 2012

Completed
4 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

June 27, 2012

Completed
Last Updated

June 27, 2012

Status Verified

June 1, 2012

Enrollment Period

3.9 years

First QC Date

June 23, 2012

Last Update Submit

June 26, 2012

Conditions

Keywords

Diabetic Neuropathy, Painful

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Change in Nerve Conduction Velocity of the Deep Peroneal, Tibial, or Sural Nerve

    Change in Nerve Conduction Velocity of the Deep Peroneal , Tibial, or Sural Nerve at 51 weeks (i.e., after three cycles of FREMS treatment) versus baseline

    baseline and 51 weeks

Secondary Outcomes (12)

  • Change in Vibration Perception Threshold

    baseline and 51 weeks

  • Change in Cold Sensory Threshold

    baseline and 51 weeks

  • Change in Warm Sensory Threshold

    baseline and 51 weeks

  • Change in Day Pain Intensity (Visual Analogue Scale)

    baseline and week 3

  • Change in Day Pain Intensity (Visual Analogue Scale)

    week 17 and week 20

  • +7 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

FREMS

EXPERIMENTAL

Frequency Modulated Neural Stimulation (FREMS)

Device: Frequency Modulated Neural Stimulation (FREMS) (Aptiva)

Control

SHAM COMPARATOR
Device: sham treatment (Aptiva)

Interventions

FREMS consisted of sequences of biphasic (negative and positive), asymmetric and electrically balanced pulses, composed of: 1) an active phase of high negative voltage spike (variable, max -300 V) and extra short duration (variable, 10-100 μsec, mostly \~40 μsec); followed by: 2) a recharging phase of low voltage and long duration (0.9 - 999 msec); pulse frequency was variable, ranging 1 to 1,000 Hz, mainly in the low range 1-50 Hz. Three cycles of 10 consecutive (one a day for 5 days/week) applications to both lower limbs were delivered.

Also known as: Aptiva device (Lorenz Biotech, Medolla, Italy)
FREMS

The sham treatment consisted of no electrical pulses delivered by the same device used to deliver the FREMS treatment and with the same treatment procedure and schedule.

Also known as: Aptiva device (Lorenz Biotech, Medolla, Italy)
Control

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 75 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Type 1 or Type 2 diabetes
  • Diabetes duration of \> 1 year
  • Age: 18 to 75 years
  • Symptomatic neuropathy
  • Abnormal amplitude, latency or conduction velocity in at least one motor nerve (Tibial or Peroneal) or in the Sural Nerve
  • A measurable Sural Nerve conduction velocity
  • Stable glycemic control in the last 3 months, HbA1C \< 11%
  • MDNS score \> 7
  • Stable dose of analgesic medications, if any, in the month prior enrollment

You may not qualify if:

  • Previous treatment with TENS or other electrotherapy
  • Motor or Sensitive nerve conduction velocity \< 30 non recordable/evocable
  • Unstable glycemic control during last 3 months
  • Pregnancy
  • Implanted pacemaker or defibrillator or neurostimulator
  • Cancer diagnosed in the last 5 years
  • Psychological or psychiatric disorders that in the Investigator's opinion may interfere with patient's compliance to study procedures
  • Active foot ulcer and/or major lower limb amputation
  • Diabetic mononeuropathy
  • Severe peripheral artery disease (Leriche Fontaine scale grade 3 and 4)
  • Ankle-brachial index (ABI) \< 0.7
  • Uremic neuropathy or end-stage renal disease
  • Toxic neuropathies
  • Severe hepatic disease
  • Alcohol consumption ≥ 40 g/day or 30 units/week

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (6)

Paris-Nord University

Bondy, Ile Del France, France

Location

Heinrich Heine University

Düsseldorf, 40225, Germany

Location

San Raffaele Hospital & Scientific Institute

Milan, MI, 20132, Italy

Location

University of Padua

Padua, PD, 35143, Italy

Location

University of Perugia

Perugia, PG, 06100, Italy

Location

Tor Vergata University

Rome, RM, 00133, Italy

Location

Related Publications (3)

  • Conti M, Peretti E, Cazzetta G, Galimberti G, Vermigli C, Pola R, Scionti L, Bosi E. Frequency-modulated electromagnetic neural stimulation enhances cutaneous microvascular flow in patients with diabetic neuropathy. J Diabetes Complications. 2009 Jan-Feb;23(1):46-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2008.02.004. Epub 2008 Apr 10.

    PMID: 18403219BACKGROUND
  • Bosi E, Conti M, Vermigli C, Cazzetta G, Peretti E, Cordoni MC, Galimberti G, Scionti L. Effectiveness of frequency-modulated electromagnetic neural stimulation in the treatment of painful diabetic neuropathy. Diabetologia. 2005 May;48(5):817-23. doi: 10.1007/s00125-005-1734-2. Epub 2005 Apr 15.

    PMID: 15834546BACKGROUND
  • Bosi E, Bax G, Scionti L, Spallone V, Tesfaye S, Valensi P, Ziegler D; FREMS European Trial Study Group. Frequency-modulated electromagnetic neural stimulation (FREMS) as a treatment for symptomatic diabetic neuropathy: results from a double-blind, randomised, multicentre, long-term, placebo-controlled clinical trial. Diabetologia. 2013 Mar;56(3):467-75. doi: 10.1007/s00125-012-2795-7. Epub 2012 Dec 13.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Diabetic Neuropathies

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Peripheral Nervous System DiseasesNeuromuscular DiseasesNervous System DiseasesDiabetes ComplicationsDiabetes MellitusEndocrine System Diseases

Study Officials

  • Emanuele Bosi, MD

    San Raffaele Hospital & Scientific Institute

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 4
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

June 23, 2012

First Posted

June 27, 2012

Study Start

May 1, 2006

Primary Completion

April 1, 2010

Study Completion

April 1, 2010

Last Updated

June 27, 2012

Record last verified: 2012-06

Locations