Tobacco Approach Avoidance Training for Adolescent Smokers-1
AAT-1
1 other identifier
interventional
40
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This is a two part study. Study 1 will compare Approach Avoidance Training (AAT) responses in smokers and nonsmokers in order to confirm that adolescent smokers experience cognitive bias towards tobacco-related stimuli.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_2
Started Sep 2011
Shorter than P25 for phase_2
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2011
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 1, 2012
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 1, 2012
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 19, 2012
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 21, 2012
CompletedAugust 21, 2013
August 1, 2013
6 months
June 19, 2012
August 19, 2013
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (5)
automatic approach tendencies towards smoking-related stimuli
For all AAT comparisons, the investigators will compare median scores (to minimize influence of outliers) for cigarette approach and cigarette avoid RTs. The difference between these values gives the smoking AAT-scores, which the investigators expect to not differ from zero in the non-smokers (or to show mild avoidance), while it is expect that smokers will be faster to approach than to avoid cigarettes. ANOVA models will be used to compare scores in smokers vs. nonsmokers. Regression analyses will be used to explore the relationships between impulsivity-related measures and AAT responses.
at end of AAT at Day 1
automatic approach tendencies towards smoking-related stimuli
For all AAT comparisons, the investigators will compare median scores (to minimize influence of outliers) for cigarette approach and cigarette avoid RTs. The difference between these values gives the smoking AAT-scores, which the investigators expect to not differ from zero in the non-smokers (or to show mild avoidance), while it is expected that smokers will be faster to approach than to avoid cigarettes. ANOVA models will be used to compare scores in smokers vs. nonsmokers. Regression analyses will be used to explore the relationships between impulsivity-related measures and AAT responses.
at end of AAT at Day 8
automatic approach tendencies towards smoking-related stimuli
For all AAT comparisons, the investigators will compare median scores (to minimize influence of outliers) for cigarette approach and cigarette avoid RTs. The difference between these values gives the smoking AAT-scores, which the investigators expect to not differ from zero in the non-smokers (or to show mild avoidance), while it is expected that smokers will be faster to approach than to avoid cigarettes. ANOVA models will be used to compare scores in smokers vs. nonsmokers. Regression analyses will be used to explore the relationships between impulsivity-related measures and AAT responses.
at end of AAT at Day 15
automatic approach tendencies towards smoking-related stimuli
For all AAT comparisons, the investigators will compare median scores (to minimize influence of outliers) for cigarette approach and cigarette avoid RTs. The difference between these values gives the smoking AAT-scores, which the investigators expect to not differ from zero in the non-smokers (or to show mild avoidance), while it is expected that smokers will be faster to approach than to avoid cigarettes. ANOVA models will be used to compare scores in smokers vs. nonsmokers. Regression analyses will be used to explore the relationships between impulsivity-related measures and AAT responses.
at end of AAT at Day 22
automatic approach tendencies towards smoking-related stimuli
For all AAT comparisons, the investigators will compare median scores (to minimize influence of outliers) for cigarette approach and cigarette avoid RTs. The difference between these values gives the smoking AAT-scores, which the investigators expect to not differ from zero in the non-smokers (or to show mild avoidance), while it is expected that smokers will be faster to approach than to avoid cigarettes. ANOVA models will be used to compare scores in smokers vs. nonsmokers. Regression analyses will be used to explore the relationships between impulsivity-related measures and AAT responses.
at end of AAT at Day 29
Study Arms (1)
Approach Avoidance Task experiment
EXPERIMENTALApproach Avoidance Task experiment
Interventions
Smokers and nonsmokers complete AAT experiment
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Between ages 13-18 years
- Able to read and write in English.
- Smokers: Smoking 5 or more cigarettes daily for at least 6 months; Baseline urine cotinine levels \> 500 ng/ml
- Nonsmokers: Never smokers; Baseline urine cotinine levels \< 50 ng/ml
You may not qualify if:
- Current criteria for dependence on another psychoactive substance
- Current diagnosis of psychosis, major depression or panic disorder
- Regular use of any psychoactive drugs including anxiolytics and antidepressants unless the medication has been taken consistently for 2 months, is currently being monitored by a physician, and the condition for which the medication is taken is considered to be stable
- Pregnant or lactating girls, based on self report.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Yale Universitylead
- VU University of Amsterdamcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Yale University, School of Medicine, Dpeartment of Psychiatry
New Haven, Connecticut, 06519, United States
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Suchitra Krishnan-Sarin, Ph.D.
Yale University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- CARE PROVIDER
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Associate Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 19, 2012
First Posted
June 21, 2012
Study Start
September 1, 2011
Primary Completion
March 1, 2012
Study Completion
March 1, 2012
Last Updated
August 21, 2013
Record last verified: 2013-08