NCT01625767

Brief Summary

This is a two part study. Study 1 will compare Approach Avoidance Training (AAT) responses in smokers and nonsmokers in order to confirm that adolescent smokers experience cognitive bias towards tobacco-related stimuli.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
40

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for phase_2

Timeline
Completed

Started Sep 2011

Shorter than P25 for phase_2

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

September 1, 2011

Completed
6 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

March 1, 2012

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

March 1, 2012

Completed
4 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

June 19, 2012

Completed
2 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

June 21, 2012

Completed
Last Updated

August 21, 2013

Status Verified

August 1, 2013

Enrollment Period

6 months

First QC Date

June 19, 2012

Last Update Submit

August 19, 2013

Conditions

Keywords

NicotineSmokingAdolescentTobacco

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (5)

  • automatic approach tendencies towards smoking-related stimuli

    For all AAT comparisons, the investigators will compare median scores (to minimize influence of outliers) for cigarette approach and cigarette avoid RTs. The difference between these values gives the smoking AAT-scores, which the investigators expect to not differ from zero in the non-smokers (or to show mild avoidance), while it is expect that smokers will be faster to approach than to avoid cigarettes. ANOVA models will be used to compare scores in smokers vs. nonsmokers. Regression analyses will be used to explore the relationships between impulsivity-related measures and AAT responses.

    at end of AAT at Day 1

  • automatic approach tendencies towards smoking-related stimuli

    For all AAT comparisons, the investigators will compare median scores (to minimize influence of outliers) for cigarette approach and cigarette avoid RTs. The difference between these values gives the smoking AAT-scores, which the investigators expect to not differ from zero in the non-smokers (or to show mild avoidance), while it is expected that smokers will be faster to approach than to avoid cigarettes. ANOVA models will be used to compare scores in smokers vs. nonsmokers. Regression analyses will be used to explore the relationships between impulsivity-related measures and AAT responses.

    at end of AAT at Day 8

  • automatic approach tendencies towards smoking-related stimuli

    For all AAT comparisons, the investigators will compare median scores (to minimize influence of outliers) for cigarette approach and cigarette avoid RTs. The difference between these values gives the smoking AAT-scores, which the investigators expect to not differ from zero in the non-smokers (or to show mild avoidance), while it is expected that smokers will be faster to approach than to avoid cigarettes. ANOVA models will be used to compare scores in smokers vs. nonsmokers. Regression analyses will be used to explore the relationships between impulsivity-related measures and AAT responses.

    at end of AAT at Day 15

  • automatic approach tendencies towards smoking-related stimuli

    For all AAT comparisons, the investigators will compare median scores (to minimize influence of outliers) for cigarette approach and cigarette avoid RTs. The difference between these values gives the smoking AAT-scores, which the investigators expect to not differ from zero in the non-smokers (or to show mild avoidance), while it is expected that smokers will be faster to approach than to avoid cigarettes. ANOVA models will be used to compare scores in smokers vs. nonsmokers. Regression analyses will be used to explore the relationships between impulsivity-related measures and AAT responses.

    at end of AAT at Day 22

  • automatic approach tendencies towards smoking-related stimuli

    For all AAT comparisons, the investigators will compare median scores (to minimize influence of outliers) for cigarette approach and cigarette avoid RTs. The difference between these values gives the smoking AAT-scores, which the investigators expect to not differ from zero in the non-smokers (or to show mild avoidance), while it is expected that smokers will be faster to approach than to avoid cigarettes. ANOVA models will be used to compare scores in smokers vs. nonsmokers. Regression analyses will be used to explore the relationships between impulsivity-related measures and AAT responses.

    at end of AAT at Day 29

Study Arms (1)

Approach Avoidance Task experiment

EXPERIMENTAL

Approach Avoidance Task experiment

Behavioral: AAT experiment

Interventions

AAT experimentBEHAVIORAL

Smokers and nonsmokers complete AAT experiment

Approach Avoidance Task experiment

Eligibility Criteria

Age13 Years - 18 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Between ages 13-18 years
  • Able to read and write in English.
  • Smokers: Smoking 5 or more cigarettes daily for at least 6 months; Baseline urine cotinine levels \> 500 ng/ml
  • Nonsmokers: Never smokers; Baseline urine cotinine levels \< 50 ng/ml

You may not qualify if:

  • Current criteria for dependence on another psychoactive substance
  • Current diagnosis of psychosis, major depression or panic disorder
  • Regular use of any psychoactive drugs including anxiolytics and antidepressants unless the medication has been taken consistently for 2 months, is currently being monitored by a physician, and the condition for which the medication is taken is considered to be stable
  • Pregnant or lactating girls, based on self report.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Yale University, School of Medicine, Dpeartment of Psychiatry

New Haven, Connecticut, 06519, United States

Location

Related Links

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Tobacco Use DisorderSmoking

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Substance-Related DisordersChemically-Induced DisordersMental DisordersBehavior

Study Officials

  • Suchitra Krishnan-Sarin, Ph.D.

    Yale University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 2
Allocation
NA
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
CARE PROVIDER
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Associate Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

June 19, 2012

First Posted

June 21, 2012

Study Start

September 1, 2011

Primary Completion

March 1, 2012

Study Completion

March 1, 2012

Last Updated

August 21, 2013

Record last verified: 2013-08

Locations