Study Stopped
No participants enrolled
Supraclavicular Versus Combined Block for Ulnar and Median Distribution Hand Surgery
Standard Supraclavicular Block Versus Low-Volume Supraclavicular Block Plus Ulnar or Median Nerve Block for Hand Surgery in the Ulnar or Median Nerve Distribution
1 other identifier
interventional
N/A
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study will examine how successfully nerves are blocked or frozen for hand surgery. Traditionally, the nerves are frozen at the base of the neck, just above the clavicle or collarbone (the supraclavicular block). This is mostly successful by itself, and provides anesthesia of the entire arm. Occasionally, an additional nerve block is required further down the arm, as the supraclavicular block may have missed a segment, or it is taking too long to come on. In this study the investigators will compare the traditional technique, with a similar but lower volume supraclavicular block plus an immediate low volume block of one nerve further down the arm (the ulnar or median nerve block, depending on which digits are being operated on). The investigators will compare success rates, speed of onset, procedural comfort and length of time of weakness and numbness, plus any adverse events.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
Started Mar 2012
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2012
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 19, 2012
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 21, 2012
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 1, 2013
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2013
CompletedMarch 25, 2020
April 1, 2015
11 months
June 19, 2012
March 23, 2020
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Successful anesthesia, defined as no additional local anesthetic or heavy sedation required.
Successful anesthesia will be determined by assessing the nerve block(s) following injection of local anesthetic, and deeming the block sufficient enough for surgery to proceed without any need for additional local anesthetic or heavy sedation. The period between the initial injection and successful anesthesia is approximately 20 minutes, depending on the patient.
From injection of local anesthetic to suitable nerve blockade for surgery; approximately 20 minutes
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Time to successful anesthetic block from withdrawal of final needle
Approximately 20 minutes
Time for procedure, from placement of probe on skin to withdrawal of needle
Approximately 30 minutes
Duration of analgesia
Approximately 6 hours
Duration of motor blockade
Approximately one hour
Patient satisfaction
24-48 hours
Study Arms (2)
Combined nerve block
EXPERIMENTALParticipants in this group will receive a supraclavicular brachial plexus block plus a median or ulnar nerve block.
Single nerve block
ACTIVE COMPARATORParticipants in this group will receive a supraclavicular brachial plexus block only.
Interventions
Combined supraclavicular brachial plexus block plus ulnar or median nerve block (depending on the location of surgery)
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Over 18 years of age
- Surgery on distal upper extremity amenable to a regional anesthetic involving the ulnar (ring, pinky fingers) or median (thumb, index, middle fingers) distribution.
You may not qualify if:
- Patient refusal
- Allergy to amide local anesthetics
- Severe coagulopathy
- Bilateral upper limb surgery
- Surgery involving bone graft from the iliac crest
- Request for general anesthetic from surgical or research team (for example, nerve stimulation studies)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University of Alberta Hospital
Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
Related Publications (7)
McCartney CJ, Brull R, Chan VW, Katz J, Abbas S, Graham B, Nova H, Rawson R, Anastakis DJ, von Schroeder H. Early but no long-term benefit of regional compared with general anesthesia for ambulatory hand surgery. Anesthesiology. 2004 Aug;101(2):461-7. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200408000-00028.
PMID: 15277930BACKGROUNDPerlas A, Lobo G, Lo N, Brull R, Chan VW, Karkhanis R. Ultrasound-guided supraclavicular block: outcome of 510 consecutive cases. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2009 Mar-Apr;34(2):171-6. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0b013e31819a3f81.
PMID: 19282715BACKGROUNDKapral S, Krafft P, Eibenberger K, Fitzgerald R, Gosch M, Weinstabl C. Ultrasound-guided supraclavicular approach for regional anesthesia of the brachial plexus. Anesth Analg. 1994 Mar;78(3):507-13. doi: 10.1213/00000539-199403000-00016.
PMID: 8109769BACKGROUNDDuggan E, El Beheiry H, Perlas A, Lupu M, Nuica A, Chan VW, Brull R. Minimum effective volume of local anesthetic for ultrasound-guided supraclavicular brachial plexus block. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2009 May-Jun;34(3):215-8. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0b013e31819a9542.
PMID: 19587618BACKGROUNDFredrickson MJ, Ting FS, Chinchanwala S, Boland MR. Concomitant infraclavicular plus distal median, radial, and ulnar nerve blockade accelerates upper extremity anaesthesia and improves block consistency compared with infraclavicular block alone. Br J Anaesth. 2011 Aug;107(2):236-42. doi: 10.1093/bja/aer101. Epub 2011 May 15.
PMID: 21576095BACKGROUNDHadzic A, Dilberovic F, Shah S, Kulenovic A, Kapur E, Zaciragic A, Cosovic E, Vuckovic I, Divanovic KA, Mornjakovic Z, Thys DM, Santos AC. Combination of intraneural injection and high injection pressure leads to fascicular injury and neurologic deficits in dogs. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2004 Sep-Oct;29(5):417-23. doi: 10.1016/j.rapm.2004.06.002.
PMID: 15372385BACKGROUNDFredrickson MJ, Patel A, Young S, Chinchanwala S. Speed of onset of 'corner pocket supraclavicular' and infraclavicular ultrasound guided brachial plexus block: a randomised observer-blinded comparison. Anaesthesia. 2009 Jul;64(7):738-44. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2009.05918.x.
PMID: 19624628BACKGROUND
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
James Cameron, MD
University of Alberta
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 19, 2012
First Posted
June 21, 2012
Study Start
March 1, 2012
Primary Completion
February 1, 2013
Study Completion
December 1, 2013
Last Updated
March 25, 2020
Record last verified: 2015-04