A Study Comparing Chemotherapy Dosing Based on Either Standard Body Surface Area or Lean Body Mass in Patients With Advanced Lung Cancer
A Phase II Double Blind Randomized Trial Comparing Standard Dosing Based on Body Surface Area Versus Dosing Based on Personalized Lean Body Mass in Patients With Stage IIIB or IV Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Receiving First Line Cisplatin Based Chemotherapy
1 other identifier
interventional
144
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Cancer patients are highly variable in their body composition, specifically in the proportion of fat and muscle. Some patients tend to gain fat and lose muscle (or lean body mass) at the same time. These patients can develop severe muscle wasting, termed sarcopenia. Patients with sarcopenia have more severe treatment related toxicity requiring delays, dose reductions and stopping of treatment, and have reduced survival. One potential explanation for this is that patients with sarcopenia have a reduced volume of lean body mass into which chemotherapy drugs are distributed, resulting in a higher concentration and greater toxicity. This study will randomize lung cancer patients to either the standard dosing strategy based on body surface area or experimental, personalized dosing based on lean body mass. Based on retrospective findings in this patient population, the investigators expect to find that severe toxicity will be reduced for sarcopenic patients on the personalized dosing arm based on lean body mass.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_2 lung-cancer
Started Jul 2014
Shorter than P25 for phase_2 lung-cancer
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 26, 2012
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 20, 2012
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
July 1, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 1, 2015
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 1, 2015
CompletedSeptember 30, 2014
September 1, 2014
1.2 years
April 26, 2012
September 26, 2014
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Dose limiting toxicity rates
Assessed weekly until patients come off study (an expected average of 9 weeks)
Number of Cycles completed
Assessed weekly until patients come off study (an expected average of 9 weeks)
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Survival
Assessed every 60 days from the date of removal from the trial (an expected average of 9 months)
Study Arms (2)
Body Surface Area Dosing
ACTIVE COMPARATORStandard dosing arm based on body surface area
Lean Body Mass Dosing
EXPERIMENTALExperimental dosing arm based on individual lean body mass
Interventions
Cisplatin dosing calculated at the rate of 75 mg/m2
Cisplatin dosing calculated at the rate of 3.10 mg/kg lean body mass
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Recommendation from treating oncologist to receive a cisplatin based chemotherapy regimen, specifically either cisplatin/vinorelbine or cisplatin/gemcitabine
- \> or = 18 years of age
- Histologically proven diagnosis of non-small cell lung cancer, Stage IIIB or IV
- Adequate renal function: creatinine \< 1.5 mg/dL or \< 132 µmol/L and creatinine clearance of \> 45 mL/min using the Cockcroft-Gault formula
- Adequate hepatic function: bilirubin \< 1.5 mg/dL or \< 25 µmol/L and AST and ALT \< 2 times upper limit of normal, unless there is evidence of liver metastases, in which case \< 5 times upper limit of normal
- Adequate hematological function: absolute neutrophil count (ANC) \> 1.5 x 109/L and platelets \> 100 x 109/L and hemoglobin \> 100 g/L
- Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0 - 2
- Negative serum pregnancy test for women of childbearing potential. Women and men of child bearing potential must use effective contraception defined as the simultaneous use of two reliable methods unless abstinence is the chosen method.
- Life expectancy of \> 4 months in the opinion of the treating oncologist
- Prior radiotherapy is allowed (unless \> 25% of bone marrow stores) if this radiation was \> 4 weeks before study entry and patient has fully recovered from toxicity of this treatment
- Willingness to comply with the study protocol
- Ability to give written informed consent with the understanding that it may be withdrawn at any time without prejudice
You may not qualify if:
- Pregnant or lactating women
- Brain metastases (a CT or MRI is not required to rule out brain metastases unless there is clinical suspicion)
- Previous or concurrent malignancies, excluding curatively treated in situ carcinoma of the cervix, in situ ductal breast cancer, non-melanoma skin cancer or low grade bladder cancer
- Patients who have had major surgery within three weeks of enrollment without a full recovery
- Prior treatment with any anticancer therapy
- Patients who have tested positive for HIV
- Any significant medical or psychiatric condition that, in the opinion of the investigator, will exclude the patient from the study for compliance or safety reasons
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Cross Cancer Institute
Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 1Z2, Canada
Related Publications (5)
Prado CM, Lieffers JR, McCargar LJ, Reiman T, Sawyer MB, Martin L, Baracos VE. Prevalence and clinical implications of sarcopenic obesity in patients with solid tumours of the respiratory and gastrointestinal tracts: a population-based study. Lancet Oncol. 2008 Jul;9(7):629-35. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(08)70153-0. Epub 2008 Jun 6.
PMID: 18539529BACKGROUNDTan BH, Birdsell LA, Martin L, Baracos VE, Fearon KC. Sarcopenia in an overweight or obese patient is an adverse prognostic factor in pancreatic cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2009 Nov 15;15(22):6973-9. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-09-1525. Epub 2009 Nov 3.
PMID: 19887488BACKGROUNDPrado CM, Baracos VE, McCargar LJ, Mourtzakis M, Mulder KE, Reiman T, Butts CA, Scarfe AG, Sawyer MB. Body composition as an independent determinant of 5-fluorouracil-based chemotherapy toxicity. Clin Cancer Res. 2007 Jun 1;13(11):3264-8. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-06-3067.
PMID: 17545532BACKGROUNDPrado CM, Baracos VE, McCargar LJ, Reiman T, Mourtzakis M, Tonkin K, Mackey JR, Koski S, Pituskin E, Sawyer MB. Sarcopenia as a determinant of chemotherapy toxicity and time to tumor progression in metastatic breast cancer patients receiving capecitabine treatment. Clin Cancer Res. 2009 Apr 15;15(8):2920-6. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-08-2242. Epub 2009 Apr 7.
PMID: 19351764BACKGROUNDAntoun S, Birdsell L, Sawyer MB, Venner P, Escudier B, Baracos VE. Association of skeletal muscle wasting with treatment with sorafenib in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma: results from a placebo-controlled study. J Clin Oncol. 2010 Feb 20;28(6):1054-60. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.24.9730. Epub 2010 Jan 19.
PMID: 20085939BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Michael B Sawyer, MD
Medical Oncologist, Cross Cancer Institute
- STUDY CHAIR
Vickie Baracos, PhD
Grant Holder, Department of Oncology, University of Alberta
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 26, 2012
First Posted
June 20, 2012
Study Start
July 1, 2014
Primary Completion
September 1, 2015
Study Completion
September 1, 2015
Last Updated
September 30, 2014
Record last verified: 2014-09